Plutarco Elias Calle: The Russian Revolution

Better Essays
For a ruler to maintain in power, the most important action he should take is to let the counter-elite circulate and get some power for them not to rebel against his government. When this does not happen, the counter-elite is not happy and this can lead them to organize the non-elite and start a revolution. A revolution is a radical change lead by violence.
The Mexican Revolution ended with a the 30 year dictatorship of Porfirio Díaz and since then there has not been a dictator. The 1917 Constitution was created; it defined the 3 powers of the nation and many things are still in our actual constitution.
Zapata and Villa made it possible for giving power to the people, made a fair government giving the lower classes a voice and establishing their ideas in plans.
Plutarco Elias
…show more content…
After it ended, Lenin wanted to expand the communist/socialist ideas throughout Europe but Stalin, after taking power, industrialized the country.
The government that he established after the revolution was great for economics and politics and leads to a powerful and economically strong country, with just leaders. But it also lead to the Cold War and many other internal conflicts.
Both, the Mexican and the Russian Revolution had many evident differences. I believe that both revolutions had many similarities in its process and development but the way they ended was different.
These two nations, were similar in the part that the lower class lived awfully, and had terrible working conditions, they were tired of the government and wanted a change, which lead them to rebel. The people were the ones who really made this possible, as Alan Wood mentioned in his book The Origins of the Russian Revolution: “Russian intellectuals constantly wrote and talked about it; activists organized for it; the government legislated against it (...) But it was the masses, the Russian people, who eventually made

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Conservatism was still the most common ideology in Europe and it made harder to build new governments. The failures towards these ideologies were the revolutions which led by some aristocrats and mostly middle class. They allied with urban labors. They wanted peaceful reform but for urban labors that was not enough. Working class wanted real economic change and they were willing to use violence.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the year 1917, multiple revolutions took place including the october revolution and the february revolution. The cause for these revolutions is to end imperial rule from other interfering countries. The reason why the russian revolution started was because people were unhappy with their king, Nicholas 2 who believed in government corruption. Once the Russian Revolution started people started to gain more support and more benefits from the government. One reason why the russian revolution of 1917 have the support of the people because the revolution mostly benefited the working class.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Contradicting Stalin’s words, and the fundamental message of communism, the common people and workers ended up with much of the burdens and sacrifices. While this document proved that Stalin was fully committed to transforming Russia into a vital economic and industrial country, he did so at the expense of his people. The proletariat were the ones to suffer underneath these policies; if they were unskilled, if they could not keep up with the quotas or demands, and they paid the price for such a rapid movement. Terror ended up being a key motive to push these practices along, which was very prevalent once Stalin became more paranoid over the years. Villages were accused of hiding the grain and other items of production.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although Mao and Stalin lived during different times and in different countries, they share similarities in their leadership and policies, they had their differences in how they handled power, and between the two, Mao is by far the worst to date. In China and in the USSR, Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin used similar tactics to bring about drastic change in their country. Both men wanted their country to be heavily industrialized.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His thesis can be proven through focusing on some of the leaders he spoke about throughout his book. Gladdis first supported his thesis when he spoke of Roosevelt, Truman, and Stalin. Stalin wanted communism and the domination of Europe. Stalin had strongly suggested that wartime expenditures in blood and treasure should determine who got what, this would give the Soviet Union a boost to control Europe. Gladdis used an interesting map to show that the Soviet Union already owned a large portion of land, but they wanted more.Roosevelt, on the other hand, wanted capitalism.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    America’s second industrial revolution had a big impact on everybody in the late 1900s. However, the biggest impact was shown on to the American industrial worker, the working class. New technological advancements cause companies to impose new injustices, labor unions form to fight back; unfortunately, the government does not act on these injustices towards the working class. The government at the time was not only corrupt, but also not ready or prepared for the problems they were about to be facing. The industrial boom starts in the 1870s when the advancement of iron and steel become apparent.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Russian Revolution of 1917, there was a class of people known as the bourgeoisie. “The English word 'bourgeoisie' is derived from the French word 'bourgeoisie' meaning "... the trading middle class"(MARXISM).” The Russian bourgeoisie in 1917 were basically a class of capitalist, landowning, and wealthy people. They wanted things to change just like everyone else but they expected things to still stay wonderful for them. However, ... The Russian bourgeoisie’s involvement was a contributing cause to the proletariats revolting in 1917.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Based on the quote Louis persecuted the Huguenots (Protestants) until they eventually left the country and took their “talents” with them adding religious toleration to the list of reasons that sparked the French Revolution. These are the steps used by Louis XIV to solidify his power and the negative consequences it had on his citizens and country. Joseph Stalin controlled the information passed around Russia, controlled the way the Soviet economy developed, and had an impact with the policy he set on the Soviet Union. By controlling the social and economic aspects, Stalin just like Louis made the life of his people a complete misfortune. For example in Document 4a it states “Although its name means “truth,” Pravda reported only what the Communist Party wanted the people to know, and facts were often ignored or distorted.” Based on this it shows that Stalin used propaganda, part of his totalitarian setup, to influence people leading to his popularity increasing which sets them up for his 5 yrs.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the midst of the period, social movements were spurred in order to counteract businesses. Big corporations such as Standard Oil and the Carnegie Steel Company devoured smaller competitions and built themselves into a monopoly through trusts, horizontal and vertical integration. The working and laboring class often suffered under these monopolies as they faced wage cuts, detrimental environment conditions and job displacements. Situations only became worse as managerial tactics invented by Henry Ford’s Fordism, and Frederick Winslow Taylor’s Taylorism which both claimed to maximize productivity. These “scientific management”, monopolies and trusts brought a lot of distressed to laborers.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is true to suggest that the depiction of the working class changes from the sympathetic to the threatening during the Victorian period? The differences between plebeians and bourgeois during the Victorian period progressed from condole the working class to threatened by them. Regardless of the sentimental portrayal to a sympathetic representation of the working class, that Charles Dickens has presented in his novels, the Victorians shared an anxiety of revolution in the middle and upper class affecting the plebeians and causing total chaos in the society. However one author, Elizabeth Gaskell, touches both issues in North and South, portraying empathy for the workers but also enabling a threat against the factory owner. There is a wide…

    • 2321 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays