Cicero's Political Speeches Analysis

Improved Essays
In Cicero’s selected political speeches, there is many things that are discussed about Rome. There is a total of nine speeches that are mentioned in this book and they are very detailed and help explain what happened in that time period of Ancient Rome through the speeches and point of view of Cicero. A little background informations on Cicero is that he was born to a wealthy family and he held important political positions in Rome so he was very influential. He also seemed to be someone who really cared about doing what was right. One of the very first series of speeches given by Cicero in this book are his speeches against Verres. These were supposed to actually be a total of seven speeches, but unfortunately Cicero was not able to give all of them because Verres actually was so ashamed and embarrassed that he went into exile before he could finish. He gave his speeches in 70 B.C., when …show more content…
He served as the prosecutor in this trial against Verres who was there for his corruption during his time as governor of Sicily. Cicero had a lot of evidence against Verres in his speeches because his main goal was to get the courts to convict him for his corruption and wrong doing. He knew that the courts and judicial system already had a bad reputation that also had to do with corruption and if they convicted Verres, it would work in their favor to put some of those rumors to rest. Cicero has to try his hardest and even has to attack Hortensius, Verres’ lawyer, and shame him for defending him. He has evidence of embezzlement and many other crimes against Verres. Its stated that Verres, although known as corrupt had a very important background as a military general and that could have saved him at trial. Cicero wants to put that to rest to and show the courts that in reality Verres was not a good general. He was known for protecting a pirate captain, setting them pirate captain free and even refusing to execute him. He made it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The blank verse (iambic pentameter) in which Antony delivers his speech creates a soothing rhythm for the crowd which develops a deeper emotional bond between himself and the people, as well as, demonstrates a poetic and thoughtful resonance to the speech, which suggests that Antony has thought about how he will be delivering the message to the crowd. The careful use of rhetoric, in terms of ethos, pathos and logos, helps skillfully persuade the crowd against the conspirators as it convinces them of Antony’s credibility (which is already very high), presentation of a logical argument (“Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?”) and the evoking of feelings through the description of Caesar’s personality. The speech also incorporates repetition of…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He was envious on everything Julius had and how much the people loved him. His speech was not to say how great the king was but to get the crowd riled up. He wanted them to turn against Julius Caesar and choose him as the next king. He wanted to rule Rome. He talked about Julius Caesar and tried brainwashing the people in his speech in order to get what he wanted.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion is the act of urging someone to do something. Some people may try to persuade others by being subtle and trying to make them do or believe something without them knowing whereas others will get straight to the point. There are innumerable different types or forms of persuasion. In the book Julius Caesar, Brutus and the conspirers assassinate Caesar in the attempt to save Rome. Brutus speaks at his funeral to try to persuade the commoners that what he did was appropriate.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    19. 58). Caesar also took charge of state funds, taking away this right from the senate (Taylor, 172). In addition, Caesar took away the tribunes power of proposing laws; the only way it was possible to present a law in an assembly was if the law had been constructed within Caesar’s office (Taylor, 173). Caesar gave for giving himself tribunal rights because he preferred to to cut out “middle-men” (Yavetz, 194). Caesar wanted to be the only man to deal with certain matters – which is against Rome’s typical government.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (III.2.94,97,100). Antony’s use of pathos, saying how good of a friend Caesar was and how much he cared for his people, and logos, recalling the times he saved prisoners and brought them home, sways the idea that killing Caesar was actually for the good of Rome. Now the view is that the murder was for the good of Brutus and the other senators so they can have more…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe the 2014 Cicero Speech Writing Award winning speech “Write Your Own Story” written by Aaron Hoover (spoken by Bernie Machen) exemplifies eloquence. This speech is an example of an eloquently written speech as well as and an eloquently delivered speech. Not only was this speech well researched, well written, and well spoken, it was also an appropriate reaction to the rhetorical situation by addressing the audience, situation, exigence, and constraints. By addressing the rhetorical situation the writer establishes credibility and likability for the speaker. This essay will discuss what made this speech eloquent by exploring the background and overview of the speech including information about the speaker, the setting, and the rhetorical…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He builds credibility by, “Roman, countrymen, and lovers… Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less” (3.2, 14, 19-20). He also builds credibility based on talking at the same level as the plebeians and he wants to build a…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Betrayal can be viewed as different aspects in the book Julius Caesar. Being that Cassius and Brutus were once friends with Caesar makes the murdering and the whole outlook of the manipulative plan of Cassius' heart breaking to know how awful both Brutus and Cassius are. In the part of the book where it is put upon Antony and Brutus to get the citizens of Rome to believe one of them, it is clear that Antony gives a better speech with the use of ethos, logos, and pathos, and he puts his situation into their point of view so they could have empathy and also sympathy for him. Brutus starts out his speech by saying, "Romans, countrymen, and lovers!…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar” Julius Ceasar was drastically assassinated by conspirators. After his death brutus explained not being so concise why he did so using Logic to tell how Ceasar could have been real bad to rome even though he only showed great integrity. Antony a close friend of Ceasar is given permission to speak by Brutus,he says how Ceasar was good and appeals to the citizens emotions Brutus starts his speech by calming the citizens down,he tells how Ceasar could turn bad. Brutus says how all the power could get to Ceasar’s head and how they stopped it before anything bad could happen.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Differences Between the Views of Cicero and Confucius Throughout the history, many civilizations have emerged with their own views on the ideal governmental structure. Cicero and Confucius both presented their own versions of the ideal government structures in Republic and Analects, respectively. Both philosophers agree with the idea that the rulers have been given a sort of divine right to rule, but they must be morally upright in order to keep this right to rule. The difference in their ideologies becomes more apparent when viewing the power structures of their ideal governments. While Confucius argues that a monarch should lead his people by being morally upright, Cicero argues that the ideal government is a balanced blend between a monarchy,…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays