Henry David Thoreau And Mccandless Comparison

Improved Essays
Though they lived centuries apart from one another, Christopher McCandless and Henry David Thoreau both uncovered the importance of living simplistically by retreating to the woods. When Thoreau first arrived at the house that he was to be staying at by Walden Pond, the first thing he noted was that the house was quite dilapidated. The walls were stained by the weather and had quite a few holes in them, causing the nights to be cold. The house also had no plastering nor a chimney, and the entire structure was only defensive against the rain. Despite these relatively unfavorable living conditions, however, Thoreau saw the experience as one to prove that people too lavish of lives to be genuinely happy. Thoreau writes in “Walden,” “An honest man has hardly need to count more than his ten fingers, or in …show more content…
When McCandless first set out on his journey, he abandoned his car, burned his remaining money, and took only paraphernalia that he deemed “necessary” with him. The only food he carried was a ten-pound bag of rice and even his equipment was not sufficient enough for the weather he was experiencing. Nevertheless, McCandless traveled around both by foot and by the use of hitchhiking. One man, Jim Gallien, who happened to pick McCandless up one day, reminisces, “‘He [McCandless] wasn’t carrying anywhere near as much food and gear as you’d expect a guy to be carrying for that kind of trip,’ Gallien recalls” (Krakauer 1). Here, it is obvious to the reader that Gallien is quite shocked at the lack of equipment, which is clearly a minuscule amount, that McCandless has loaded. One would think that McCandless would have many items with him, granted that he was planning on spending a couple of months in the wilderness of Alaska, but he was taking only what he believed was essential. By doing this, the embodiment of simplicity is

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    (157). McCandless seemed to be content with being on his own when it came to doing something he wanted to do. He did not need to rely on anyone for the things he wanted to do, he just made them happen, hence why he dropped everything to go on his journey into the wild. Krakauer uses many different things to help the readers figure out McCandless’s motives, but the letters do not give it straight forward. One must interpret the language used in the epigraph to figure out the theme of the chapter to help with finding the…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCandless was exhilarated, so much so that he decided to bury most of his worldly possessions in the parched earth of Detrital Wash and then--in a gesture that would have done Tolstoy proud--burned his last remaining cash, about $160 in small bills.” all these gestures and actions just to demonstrate that he wanted to be self…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His actions were not honorable and his decisions were those of a child. As a young headstrong man filled with hubris, he entered the harsh bush with little preparation. Running away from civilization, McCandless was like many other young men and women who travel to Alaska. He was disoriented, exasperated with societal prospects, probing for an adventure and a peregrination that would provide enlightenment.. An edifier from the Arctic circle expressed his noetic conceptions on McCandless, “I’ve run into several McCandless types out in the country… idealistic, energetic young guys who overestimated themselves, underestimated the country, and ended up in trouble.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the course of his cross-country journey to Alaska he did receive some help from people, but McCandless attempted to minimize all relations with people in order to maintain his self-imposed social isolation. Krakauer writes, “he [McCandless] had again evaded the impending threat of human intimacy of friendship, and all the messy emotional baggage that comes with it” (Krakauer 55.) His Alaskan expedition can be characterized by McCandless experiencing a seemingly unnecessary exile from society and exhibiting a strong sense of self-reliance. He decided to take his life in his own hands and take charge of his future by becoming dependent only on himself.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although McCandless chose to abandon his comfortable life and live as a hitchhiker, he exuded intelligence throughout his journey. Krakauer tries to look past the stereotypical remarks made about McCandless and view him as an individual, going the extra mile to undercover what really happened. Moreover, Krakauer illustrates that McCandless was different from normal hitchhikers “It would be easy to stereotype Christopher McCandless as another boy who felt too much, a loopy young man who read too many books and lacked even a modicum of common sense. But the stereotype isn't a good fit.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, an American philospher and naturalist once stated that "The price of anything is the amount of time you exchange for it. " I have to say that I agree with Thoreau's statement and I have proof to show you why. Let's take the work enviroment for example. If you have a job where you get paid by the hour, you can get paid for doing overtime. Depending on how much extra time you put in, the cost measures.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chris McCandless went into the wild in order to be alone, live off of the land, become one with nature, and experience the great United States for its raw beauty. McCandless was not necessarily trying to escape the world to realize what life meant to him, but purely because he loved it. McCandless never left a footprint anywhere he went that would destroy nature, but simply just to experience new cultures and to live with what nature had to offer him. While living in the Alaskan wilderness, McCandless took what was necessary, including hunting game and picking berries, and left what was not unbothered. However, Thoreau went into the wilderness to get a sense of what life truly meant.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frederick Douglass differs from H. D. Thoreau in the sense that he doesn’t believe that all government is oppressive and manipulative. When it came to the issue of slavery, an injustice recognized by most, Douglass felt true in his convictions to do whatever possible to end such an inequality. He may have changed his opinion on the Constitution around 1851 once the issue of slavery became more of a prejudice than an oppressive institution centered around injustice towards people’s senses of equality and freedom. He clearly understood there to be a time for rebellion to the current system in place if everything isn’t reflective of the principles set out in the Declaration of Independence and the preamble of the Constitution. “It shall not avail that the Constitution and…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As someone who is being governed by a government he finds unjust, Thoreau believes we must object to anything we find morally wrong. He claims the public must rely on their morals, and conscience to stand up to a government that does not rely on morals and…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Krakauer characterizes McCandless's constant traveling as his way of escaping human connections. He isolates himself physically and emotionally, hoping to find freedom and self-identity within. McCandless goes to extreme lengths to avoid being like his parents, omitting experiences from his past life he and his friends once enjoyed, oblivious to the fact that he is hurting his friends and family as a result. In one particular scene Krakauer writes, “The hitchhiker swung his pack into the bed of the Ford and introduced himself as Alex” (4). Introducing himself as “Alexander” allows for his hope in building a new identity to become realistic.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Henry David Thoreau wrote in a time of change and ages past. Every era is opposed to the ones preceding and succeeding itself, but the Romantics were truly a group who hearkened to an old tune; one of integrated civilization and nature in medieval times. When he wrote Walden, Thoreau wrote about his own experiences in the natural world and how it changed him. In his writing, Thoreau explains why one should live deliberately. He actively argues to convince the reader to do so.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He is able to reach this conclusion after spending several years in isolation at Walden Pond, where he realizes that life is like a marathon, not a race. In order to live a full life, it is necessary to spend time thinking, reflecting, and improving, instead of stressing about everyday life and its details. Thoreau’s perception of life can be applied to the modern world, where distractions and details are rampant. Instead of spending time and focusing on details such as technology, social media, and the sort, one should strive to develop as a person and simplify life, since true fulfillment lies from deep within and can only be attained after a lifetime of thinking and…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first and second chapter describe the beginning and end of McCandless’s journey of surviving in the wilderness. By beginning the novel without a background of his life, the reader is able to make assumptions of Christopher without bias from his journey and background information. This also draws the reader into the mystery of McCandless’s death and why he began the journey in the first place. The next chapters begin with anecdotes from Wayne Westerberg and Ronald Franz describing their time with McCandless, a background of McCandless’s life in Virginia, and what McCandless pursued after he left Westerberg and Franz. The use of background information before McCandless’s…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays