Bottom - up approaches explains the quality of how things can be handled better of by (Wells, 2015). Wells’ explains how most child protective systems use a top- down approach on how the government imposes formal approaches but what it states is to how they should be able to use less informal approaches to better the community. They should try using the alternative approach to within. It is said that the Top-down approach has failed to listen to the family and community needs if fails to see modest needs to the child’s protection as well as well-being.
A mixed method is used explaining the qualitative and quantitative method it has been explained that there are three types of approaches. Top-down, which is more of higher up making decisions holding policies and making law’s. Secondly, is Bottom-up approach is to building more of a face and name within the community to hold their trust. Lastly, is the Middle-out approach which I didn’t quite understood but to my thought process it means more of city council within the communities but as well as trying to get an extended hand of support from other nation wide …show more content…
An outcome analysis has been conducted to follow-up on the response program on how well they are getting responses from Child Protection Services. An extended follow-up had been conducted to see the progress in Child Protective Services offices in 10 countries of the mid-western United States. A multitude type of arranged assessment were performed over a 15-month period to then be from 45-60 months. “ During there research they took notice of improved family engagement.” ( Loman. 2015; Siegel. 2015). It mentions that an increase and broadened services were found to have occurred. The theory to madness was that changes came from mediated extended outcomes. (Siegel, 2015). In the newly theory found of there research there is a relationship outcome as it had been discussed for further