Character Analysis: Juror-12-Angry Men In '12 Angry Men'

Decent Essays
Character Analysis- Juror 6 Edward Binns, a quiet, slightly uneducated, and protective guy. As juror number six in the film and having the career as a painter, Binns is an average white man. This does not separate Binns from the other jurors, although they may all come from different backgrounds, they are all white men. Race may not play a huge roll in this case because the boy on trial is also white, but this does aid in knowing the unfair trials that must have occurred in this time period. “I think that’s possible.” This line from the film, said by Edward Binns, supports his open mindedness. Part of the reason I believe Binns is so open minded is due to his unintelligence, he doesn’t know what to believe and he doesn’t have any information or knowledge to infer. Though, he does relate the crime scene to …show more content…
He is very good at what most struggle with, and that is listening before you speak. With his slightly lower intelligence he learned to focus and follow along more closely to what others say as well as pick up on mannerisms and expressions. Whereas those who are more educated feel they can go ahead and make the prediction without listening with their whole heart. Binns sits quietly and takes everything in and lets it process before he says what is on his mind. Open mindedness to what others have to say is Binns’ greatest strength. He really pays close attention to what others have to offer and what they say truly influences his thought process. This may or may not always be a good thing, but it helps in many situations. The cause of his open mindedness is due to his lack of knowledge or higher education, his greatest weakness. Having limitations on your intelligence will put you in a different position, whether it be with a job, grammar, pronunciation, or just carrying on a basic conversation with

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    One character that exemplifies the theme of ‘prejudice’ in this play is the 3th Juror. In the play, it reads, “8th Juror: You want to see this boy die because you personally want it, not because of the facts. 3rd Juror: Shut up!”…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up he was supported by a cast of people from all walks of life using their experiences and ways of approaching obstacles. He would learn these traits from watching these people go through the day performing tasks and having the skills to achieve them. Mr.Spruill makes it clear when he said talked…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Group Dynamics Which source of group influence explains why we don’t cut in line, interrupt others, or invade people’s personal space? In what ways does this source of influence differ from the others? When we are out in public we display certain societal norms, it is different for everywhere we go. For example, when going into a bank you know to hold the loudness in your voice to a certain degree while talking to the cashiers. You also know to wait in line for your turn and not cutting people in line.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He is at first domineered by others but finds his voice as the discussion goes on and later on gives the vote of not being guilty for the accused. Jack Klugman He is shown as the 5th juror in the movie who himself belongs from a violent slum area. He is a soft-spoken young man who changes his vote to not guilty when it was proved that due to the disturbance created by the train, it was not possible to listen what the accused yelled. Edward Binns…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He is a person that is very smart and can take control of any situation. He knows how to get along with everyone and how to get his point across. I know that he could have ran his own business or mange a business and made it a big success. However without an education you cannot get very far in life. Even though you can do the job you need proof that you have the education to back it up.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 9: He is an old man and experienced. He observes and interprets in a rational way. He was bold enough to support Jury#8. • Now step back and focus on the systemic level: What clue does their personal history (occupation, nationality, socio-economic status, family circumstances, or educational background) provide about the societal faction each juror…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system of America is constantly criticized for being unfair. The establishment of an unfair justice system is due to bias and bigotry. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows the prejudices of the system as twelve different men, from different past, must concur and make a verdict on a murder case. The author indicates that the justice system is unfair through biases portrayed in the juror’s dialogue, past history, and attitude in making a verdict.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men (1957) exhibited the power of an eyewitness, the characteristics of the defendant, and the power of group influence that affects the jury. Throughout the film, the reliability of the eyewitness was questioned. There were two eyewitnesses in the movie, the old man, who lives in the apartment below of the crime scene, and the old woman, who lives across the street. According to the film, there is a possibility that the eyewitnesses misinformed the jury about the crime scene. Eyewitnesses may not be as reliable as they are thought to be.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through being kind, being open, and thoughtful conversation, Juror Number Eight helps to shape the final resolution in a difficult murder case. Juror Number Eight appears to be an intelligent man who seeks justice and the truth. He is dressed nicely and is well put together. He shows compassion and respect. In the first vote taken by the jury, the result is eleven votes guilty with one vote not guilty.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He takes great care in going unnoticed, proving how attentive and cautious he is. Lastly, in mocking the old man, he proves to be calculating and…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They are then challenged by the group leader, the architect. Another juror, who is a grumpy older man, calls architect a “bleeding heart”. He seems to have resentment against people who live in the slums. During this time, one juror asks the others to clarify their reasons for their guilty verdict to the architect, hoping the architect will change his mind. Shockingly, several of the jurors imply that the defendant being a poor, non-white, young man is reason enough for a conviction.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Society is remarkably quick to judge a situation without thoroughly investigating it. During the movie 12 Angry Men, the old saying that you cannot judge a book by its cover, truly comes to life. This movie shows and explains the process that the jury on each case go through. It shows how each juror goes through the process of determining whether the defendant is guilty or not. Throughout the duration of this paper, you will be provided definitions and examples of three ways that this movie relates to Communications 1010.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, he can be himself and he knows where everything is, instead of wondering how others function in the other…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays