Cause Of Julius Caesar's Death Essay

Improved Essays
While it may seem that Julius Caesar’s death had no impact to the fall of the Roman Republic, it actually is the catalyst of the fall. Julius Caesar’s death started a domino effect in which made a weak military, corrupt dictators, and lack of political support from its citizens. In 44 BCE, Julius Caesar was assassinated when in a senate meeting. His fellow senate members stealthily surrounded him, and all went on to stab him. Twenty-three gashes all around the body cause him to collapse to the floor, and die. Before this had happened, Caesar was known to be a great military leader. “Caesar was an on-and-off strategic genius; that is, at times he displayed an extraordinary grasp of military planning, while at other times he misjudged the situation.”. …show more content…
One reason for this is that Caesar increased the amount of senators by four hundred. Not only that, but most of the people Caesar hired as senators were plebeians. So, since Caesar was giving jobs to the poor, they turned their support towards him. Not only did he give jobs to the poor, but he also kept the amount of wealth in both the plebeians and patricians in check. For example, Caesar gave veterans land, which not only supported their families, but also gave reason to people to fight. Even apart from soldiers and veterans, Caesar also earned the support from the general public. When he died, Caesar’s will gave some part of his royalties to every citizen of the republic. Caesar was able to control his use of power, and could see if he was abusing it. This power brought peace and prosperity to Rome, but this trust between Caesar and the people created danger for future rulers that were not as easily supported. The people of the Roman Republic became too trusting of their rulers, which is a factor that caused the introduction of abusive political rulers. This is the snowball effect given to the Republic once Caesar

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    They created a demand that Caesar disband his legions and return to Rome unarmed. This would mean Caesar could be tried and executed. Caesar tried to negotiate a deal where both he and his co-consul, Pompey, both disband their armies and return to Rome to prevent Pompey from having complete power over Rome, but the senate would not accept. They voted that Caesar was to disband his army and Pompey was to retain his own. Caesar knew that if he did not do something bold he would be killed and Rome would collapse, so on a cold January night in 49 B.C.E he crossed the Rubicon and plunged the Republic into a brutal civil war.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stevens, 2003), Caesar was able to exercise significant political control over Rome. The view that it was, “simpler to follow the blast of a trumpet than the swirl of contradictory obligations that had always characterized civilian life,” (Holland T, 2003) made up the framework of Caesar’s ability to gain power. His rise to dictatorship threatened the system which the Republic survived on, specifically the strict set of checks and balances that disabled any possibility for a sole individual to gain absolute power. His ability to dominate the Senate, magistrate and the people of Rome, threatened the Senate in particular, stated in the…

    • 1791 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Essay On Ancient Rome

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome’s “fall” was caused and fueled by many things. The people were very indecisive on what they thought was right. Rome’s economy was failing at the thought of the disease occurring. Most of all, they became complacent in who they were. They still needed to grow as an empire, in their “maturity”, but they saw their new emperors, who were being assassinated, as their right leaders.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    19. 58). Caesar also took charge of state funds, taking away this right from the senate (Taylor, 172). In addition, Caesar took away the tribunes power of proposing laws; the only way it was possible to present a law in an assembly was if the law had been constructed within Caesar’s office (Taylor, 173). Caesar gave for giving himself tribunal rights because he preferred to to cut out “middle-men” (Yavetz, 194). Caesar wanted to be the only man to deal with certain matters – which is against Rome’s typical government.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the late Roman Republic, Michael Parenti proposes to interpret conflicts such as power through the use of what he calls “A people’s history, therefore the title “A People’s history of ancient Rome”. In Michael Parenti’s words, “A people’s history should be not only an account of popular struggle against oppression but an expose of the anti-people’s history that has prevailed among generations of mainstream historians” (Parenti pg.11). His intention is to present the reader with a history based on resistance vs oppression, but also point out the key facts that many historians have based Roman history on which are incorrect and highly biased. This is also demonstrated in the following line when he quotes “It should be a critical history…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Triumvirate and the eventual assassination of Caesar by the senate would set in motion the collapse of the Roman Republic. It would seem that it was destined for the Roman Republic to fall, because despite the senate’s efforts to keep their power and influence it was them who pushed it over the edge. The problems of the Republic should have been solvable by compromise, but the aristocratic solidarity upon which the entire Roman system rested began to break down. The death throes of the republic began in 133 BC.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Death of Caesar” by Barry Strauss, tells the story of history’s most famous assassination, the assassination of Julius Caesar. Caesar was a military dictator and in line for the crown until the Ides of March 44 B.C. when he was betrayed by his best friend and murdered. This was result of a civil war in Rome. As Caesar began to gain power he became an obvious threat to the Roman Republic.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Caesar was elected consul two years before he was legally allowed to he ratified Pompey’s oriental acts. The oriental acts essentially gave land to the urban, poor, and soldiers that did not have any. Crassus got allies that he had coveted to go along with all of his money.. Caesar received the political backing and connections he was looking for. A crucial goal of Caesar’s was to rise to power and aligning with Crassus and Pompey made the rise a lot easier.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fall Of Rome DBQ

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The principle reasons for the "Fall" of Rome were ,first, political instability, with an inability to have long terms as emperors[A], or control the dwindling Roman army[B], and the corruption within the high ranks of the government[E]. Also there were several invasions from the Huns [D] and others [C],with citizens who were happy to the better way of life of their captors[E]. Finally, there were many natural or environmental factors beyond the empire's control that contributed to the fall of the Roman empire, such as closeness to other warring people groups[C], consecutive natural disasters[F], and disease[F]. Political instability was a large factor in the decline of the Roman Empire. A chart compiled from various sources outlined the reign and cause of death of each emperor from 235-285 CE.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Money meant power and the Senate was keen to obtain more power. With this mantra in mind, the Senate treated the poor (the non-Roman citizens) worse than they were. They experienced harsh changes in their lifestyle, such as a new tax system. Strict collectors would take away their land if they failed to pay up and there was nothing they could do to stop this. Then came the Gracchi brothers, who were part of the “legal system” of Rome.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Caesar was already beginning to show that power was getting to head, and if he was given absolute power, that feeling of self-perfection would only grow. That feeling would lead to Caesar make bad decisions that would most likely have negatively impacted Rome. In conclusion, Julius Caesar truly deserved his death. He had many physical weaknesses that would have greatly held him back as a ruler.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there was one man in the history of the Roman Empire who had the greatest effect on the Roman population, it was surely Gaius Julius Caesar. Caesar, in his brief period in charge of Rome, made great improvements to the city and the lives of its inhabitants. His changes brought benefits to all the classes of Rome, from the plebs to the Nobiles, as well as setting up the Roman Empire for many more prosperous years to come. He made changes to all aspects of Rome, from the political system to the debt system to the calendar, as well as many others, nearly all of which benefited the Roman people.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    William Shakespeare is a master writer who discusses sensitive and controversial subjects within his plays. He touches on timeless social issues such as suicide. In his plays Julius Caesar and Hamlet, William Shakespeare tackles suicide and the weight it carries with different individuals within different cultures. Julius Caesar depicts suicide in regards to Brutus and Cassius, the leading conspirators in the murder of Julius Caesar. Taking place in Rome when honor, valor, and triumph were the most important values; Brutus, Cassius, and other Romans considered suicide as an honorable way to die.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The title alone of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare speaks volumes about the nature of Caesar’s death. Labeling the leader’s fall as a tragedy creates an aura of sadness around the loss, portraying his murder as an unfortunate and brutal occurrence. However, the motives of the conspirators that ended Caesar’s life were not wholly ruthless. Rather, this group of men sought to save Rome from the tyranny and negligence that they believed was being perpetrated by Caesar himself. The fact that their intentions were honest and their violence was limited to the bare minimum suggests that the death of Caesar is better described as a sacrifice than a butchery.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augustus and Caesar: A Comparison Julius Caesar remains one of history’s best generals and propagandists. However, Caesar’s reign came to a quick and brutal end with his assassination. In contrast, Caesar’s inexperienced nephew Augustus would go on to succeed where Caesar failed. Augustus’s rule was long, and inarguably successful. While Augustus’s comparative success might appear to result from historical contingencies, a closer examination reveals that was Augustus was a much shrewder politician than Caesar.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays