Case Study Under Rule 8.1. Chandler

Improved Essays
Under Rule 8.1, Chandler, was wrong by not disclosing his DUI to the bar. An individual for entering to the bar, or an attorney in connection with the admission to the bar application, shall not knowingly make an untrue statement of material fact, or fails to tell a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the applicant to have arisen in the matter. He knowingly failed to respond to a lawful demand for information of admission or to the disciplinary authority. This rule does not require the disclosure of facts otherwise protected by Rule 1.6. This is a duty imposed by this Rule extends to persons seeking to enter the bar. Chandler needed to be up front with the admissions by answering the question honestly. If the bar was to find out the truth, he could be …show more content…
Any attorney who knows that another attorney has committed a violation under the Rules of Professional Conduct shall inform the proper professional authority. As for Joey, he too has committed this offense by not going forth with informing the bar.
Joey has further committed violations under the Model Rules. Under Rule 8.4, Joey, violated and attempted to violate this rule by knowingly assisted Chandler to go to another firm. He wrote a reference letter to the bar that did not mention the conviction. Chandler was admitted in a new state under false misrepresentation of facts.
The ABA Model Rule uses the mandatory language that a lawyer “shall” report violations. Failure to abide by the rule is sanction able. In states that have adopted this mandatory language, failure to report misconduct is itself an ethics violation. It would be a terrible result to be disciplined for failure to report someone else’s violation.
However, in some states, Georgia being one, it is not an affirmative violation to fail to report. In its Rule 8.3, Georgia explicitly states: “There is no disciplinary penalty for a violation of this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If Count was in a state that had dram shop laws, which are laws that hold the bar accountable for any damages that occur as a result of an intoxicated patron, he would have a stronger case. However, states that do not have dram shop laws, follow case law (Haafke v. Mitchell, 1984). Regardless, the bar should argue that Count did not look visibly intoxicated and they should not be held responsible. In a similar case, Haafke vs. Mitchell, Haafke was killed when Mitchell wrecked their vehicle after being allowed to leave a bar intoxicated in the state of Iowa. Dram shop laws are in effect in Iowa, which is why the bar was found to be responsible for allowing their patrons to leave and drive intoxicated (Haafke v. Mitchell,…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jim wants to argue that he did not knowingly drink enough to make him drunk, but the judge instructs the jury that it…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Facts: Law Society investigators sent 6 letters to Mr. Garvis and contacted him by telephone regarding two misconduct issues. The first accusation consisted of Mr. Garvis fraudulently obtaining a power of attorney, transferring title property to himself, and interfering with the sale of a property. The second accusation consisted of Mr. Garvis mishandling trust funds and acting outside the paralegal scope of practice. Mr. Garvis, received…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chino Police Case Summary

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Butler told her that he was high and did not remember. The officer asked Butler why his best friend and two good friends would lie about him inappropriately touching them. Butler said he could not think of a good reason why they would lie. However, he said he honestly did not remember anything after he fell asleep but did say he was sorry because he used drugs which may have caused his activity that night.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pc 647

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I smelled a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage emitting from Howard’s breath as he spoke. I noticed that Howard was swaying approximately one to two inches from side to side. I also observed that Howard’s eyes were watery and bloodshot. Howard admitted to drinking one beer and two shots of Vodka earlier during the evening, NFD. Based on Howard’s objective symptoms of intoxication, I formed the opinion he was intoxicated and unable to care for himself in public.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cpl Cheating Case

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You stated that you did not feel impaired at this time. After arriving at ssg ' house you stayed there for approximately 90 minutes and stated that you did not drink there but you saw SGT Blunt drink one…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jim and Mae Corn Jim Corn met his wife online after being introduced to her by her sister. Mae was not a natural United States citizen and of course would require certain steps in order to become a citizen. After a brief courtship, Jim went to visit Mae in her native home of Mongolia and brought her back to the U.S. with him on a travel visa to make the preparations for their wedding. After Jim and Mae were married here in the U.S. Jim made contact with an attorney who specialized in matters of immigration. After paying a sizeable fee to have the legal processes started Jim and Mae began to live their lives and wait for the paperwork to go through.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lee Vs Hanley Case Study

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Attorneys who are sued for actions constituting a violation of their professional obligations can use the one year statute of limitations under CCP §340.6 as a defense. Tortious conduct such as conversion isn't subject to the 1 year statute of limitation. Lee v. Hanley I. The Trial Court In Lee v. Hanley,…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lance Mason Case

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the case of Ohio State Bar Association v. Lance T. Mason, it is argued that Lance Mason should not be disbarred due to a felony conviction for assault. In the case, Lance Mason physically assaulted his wife while driving down the highway while his two children were in the vehicle. Mason was convicted of the offense and served time in prison. Hearings were concluded and it was recommended that Mason be disbarred for his felony conviction. His counsel is arguing that instead of disbarment, Mr. Mason should receive an indefinite suspension with time served.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every state except Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, Tennessee and Wisconsin belong to the Interstate Drivers License Compact (IDLC). This means when you are arrested for DUI in a member state belonging to the IDLC you will be subjected to penalties in the other member state that you reside in. If you fail to show up in court for the out-of-state DUI, your state may issue a bench warrant for your arrest, suspend your license, charge fines and/or imprison you for your offense. Your first step, if you are arrested for DUI in a state other than the one in which you reside is to hire a DUI lawyer of your choosing to defend your case. Your lawyer will advise you which state, the offending state or your resident state is the best…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the judge should of analyze more George background of where he was coming…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas of Defense Attorneys Defense attorneys have to face the ethical dilemma every day of whether or not to defend their client as well as whether or not to maintain that lawyer-client privilege. The lawyer-client privilege provides a security blanket for the client. Under this privilege, the client can almost tell the lawyer just about anything in confidence and not have to worry about the possible fear of being judged or incriminating themselves. A defense attorney serves as a guide that you can basically tell all your deepest darkest secrets to. However, some of those secrets may not always be able to be kept confidential, so be careful about what secrets you share.…

    • 3179 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Limits Of Confidentiality

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jefferson works with adults on probation and has just heard one of his clients tell how she punishes her six-month- old child which seems excessive to him Human service professionals protect the client 's right to privacy and confidentiality except when such confidentiality would cause serious harm to the client or others, when agency guidelines state otherwise, or under other stated conditions (e.g., local, state, or federal laws). Human service professionals inform clients of the limits of confidentiality prior to the onset of the helping relationship. (“National organization for human services”,2015) Section one standard three, this standard directly applies because the client tells of an act of abuse against a…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Law 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    36. a) Yes, because even though Peterman only provided Fogelman with a contract of agency that allowed him to sell the home, it can be inferred that he is also allowed to sell the piano that was still in the home. It does not have to be explicitly stated in the contract of agency. b)…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rachel is an alcoholic which undoubtedly affects her recollection of certain events. When one of the characters go missing, Rachel believes “the police will suspect that [her husband has] done something to her, and I know it isn’t true, because I know him” (79). Not only does Rachel lie to herself, but she lies to the police. She wants to help out the investigation but is just causing trouble, making up lies that she barely recognizes because the addition of being an alcoholic has affected what she knows. However, Rachel knows she is lying because she says, “that day last summer, when I went to Tom and Anna’s, it didn’t happen exactly the way I told the police it had” (107).…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays