Case Study Of Abigail Fisher

Improved Essays
The issue is the following: Are similarly situated college applicants being treated dissimilarly on the basis of race in violation of the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause? The holding is that similarly situated college applicants are being treated dissimilarly on the basis of race. The Supreme Court finds in favor of Abigail Fisher.

The plaintiff has been injured by the actions of the defendant. Specifically, Abigail Fisher suffered financial injury as a result of the University of Texas at Austin collecting $100 in filing fees from Fisher. State action is present because the University of Texas at Austin is a public actor because the University of Texas at Austin is a public university.

The Supreme Court will use the strict scrutiny

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The legal issue here is deciding wether the Law school has the right to take race into consideration when accepting and rejecting students with diversity being a driving factor. Does this Admission process violate the equal protection clause or the civil rights act of…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court stated that existing provisions for state aid to financial public education did not violate the equal protection clause for both Federal and State Constitution. It was also not unconstitutional under the education article of the state constitution. This action had challenged the state’s provisions for financing public schools that was prosecuted by two groups. The original plaintiff in 1974 is the board of education of 27 school districts that are located at various places in the state and 12 students of public schools located in some districts. The original plaintiff felt that the system for financing public schools that was presented in the state, in which funds that are raised by locally imposed taxes by the share of the state’s money violates the equal protection clause at both state and federal.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion I find that the Abigail N. Fisher has presented a good amount evidence proving that the University of Texas, Austin’s policy is unconstitutional based on their policy of accepting students not apart of the top 10 percent of their class and that the supreme court should rule in her favor. Abigail N. Fisher seems to have had the potential to be able to succeed at the University. Even though she was not considered apart of the top ten percent of her senior class she was in the twelve percent range and was still a highly competitive applicant. Not being accepted due to the University's goals of creativing diversity is not constitutional. Everyone should be given a fair chance to be admitted into the college especially if they are…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not only does this case deal with the concept of affirmative action and racial quotas, but also the equal protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that no business or state shall deny a person based on their race or sex. Allan Bakke, the defendant in this case, actually applied to the university two…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tituba, Sarah Osborne, and Sarah Good were accused for afflicting Betty, Abigail, and other girls. , who had began to suffer fits. Abigail accused Rebecca Nurse of trying to force her to sign the devil's book. “Rebecca Nurse's apparition tried to choke, pinch, and tempt Abigail into the fire Abigail Williams - Salem Witch Trials.)”.…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Mock Supreme Court, I had the role of being a Justice, which made it my job to give the final judging in all cases involving laws of Congress, and the Constitution. I worked on the case Fisher v. University of Texas, rooting back to 1977 when Texas legislation made a law that required the University of Texas give admission to all high school seniors who positioned in the top ten percent of their class. When discovering the lack of diversity in the their college 's undergraduates and state populace, the University of Texas chose to change its previously unbiased racial acceptances . The new approach allowed all in-state students who graduated in the main ten percent of their high school classes admission. For the rest of the in-state…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 14th amendment wins this case with ease. “Harrison Bergeron” simply misses the point when defining equality. Equality is not about everyone being the same, but about people being able to express individuality while being treated equally and having the same opportunities regardless of who you are. “Harrison Bergeron” also goes about enforcing equality in the wrong way. Forcing citizens to wear “handicaps” defeats the purpose of being equal.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each day, Linda Brown and her sister had to walk through a dangerous railroad switchyard to get to the bus stop for the ride to their all-black elementary school (Summary of case on canvas). At the time there was a school closer but it was for white students only. Linda Brown and her family took a case to Federal court but the ruling was that no right was violated because the education system is very similar in black and white schools. After they had lost in federal court, the family had taken the case to the U.S. Supreme Court and the ruling was that the 14 amendment was being violated by a state law called, “Equal but…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    citizens. Although the Executive Order 9808 held equality, it did not prevent the states from promoting segregation and discrimination. For instance, in Sipuel v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents, Marshall, Sipuel’s civil rights attorney, argued that the denial of Sipuel’s admission because of her race and color was considered to be illegal. In addition, Marshall claimed that the words “separate” and “equal” were not equivalent, and could not be used together at the same time (Ladino, 13). Although the court ruled that the university’s rejection of Sipuel was unconstitutional in terms of the Fourteenth Amendment, the court claimed that desegregation was not the problem that interrupted Sipuel’s admission.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Westminster and Brown Case The Fourteenth Amendment was enforced in the U.S. Constitution to protect all citizens of color and status equal rights and protection of the laws. History shows America has not always used this important amendment in its righteous way. The Westminster and Brown case impacted America and the fight to stop discrimination on behalf of minority citizens. The American people manipulated the Fourteenth Amendment to allow equal rights in the form of “separate but equal.”…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fisher Vs Texas

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Government CBA 5/6/16 Fisher v. University of Texas-Austin Fisher v. University of Texas, (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the affirmative action admittance policy of the University of Texas-Austin. The Supreme Court overruled the lower appellate court's ruling that favored the University and protracted the case, holding that the lower court had not applied the standard of strict scrutiny, articulated in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) and Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), to its admissions program. The Court's ruling in Fisher took Grutter and Bakke as given and did not directly revisit the constitutionality of using race as a factor in college admissions. Thus showing that the University…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of MUW

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The third argument addressed was MUW was not established to compensate for women. At most MUW policy perpetuated the serotyped view of nursing as an exclusively women’s jobs. The state failed to achieve there alleged objective by creating a discriminatory school. The last argument addresses MUW admission statement violates Title IX of education amendment in the equal protection clause. Title IX education amendment reads, “ The Educational Amendment of 1972, prohibiting sex discrimination in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court.” Key Excerpts from the Dissenting Opinion | www.Streetlaw.org, landmarkcases.org/en/Page/434/Key_Excerpts_from_the_Dissenting_Opinion. Paragraph 3). The Thirteenth Amendment abolished slavery, so if someone have property or if someone is in poverty this won’t affect their freedom. “The white race deems itself to be dominant race race in this country”(Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court.”…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abigail Williams: Abigail Williams is arguably the main antagonist of “The Crucible”, her decisive motives and actions clearly project one of a main story’s antagonist. Abigail Williams, the niece of Reverend Parris and former servant of John Proctor. Abigail is an orphan, and an unmarried girl, which virtually signifies no respect and no power in Salem. The actions and motives of Abigail are mostly fueled by her desire to be relevant and powerful in Salem, amongst the ministers and other high authority figures in Salem. The Salem witch trials prove to be a grand opening for Abigail to take advantage of the spooked and ignorant citizens of Salem, as she manipulatively influences the other irrelevant and powerless girls in Salem to abide by…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Separate But Equal Essay

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nonetheless, the defense purported that segregation was not unconstitutional in any way and there was nothing in the constitution outlawing it. They claimed that it was a matter that should be handled by the states and states should decide on the matter. Nevertheless, the court sided with the plaintiffs ruling that segregation violated the 14th amendment, which guaranteed that ‘states could not deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law’. In the case’s commentary, chief Justice Earl Warren said that” In the arena of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ is not applicable.” He also added saying,” separate educational facilities are inherently…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays