The Pros And Cons Of MUW

The third argument addressed was MUW was not established to compensate for women. At most MUW policy perpetuated the serotyped view of nursing as an exclusively women’s jobs. The state failed to achieve there alleged objective by creating a discriminatory school. The last argument addresses MUW admission statement violates Title IX of education amendment in the equal protection clause. Title IX education amendment reads, “ The Educational Amendment of 1972, prohibiting sex discrimination in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
Holding
When Justice O’ Conner delivered the opinion of the court she address the invalid arguments of the state,
“The State’s primary justification for maintaining the single …show more content…
Also, in her opinion she stated Hogan exclude from MUW” perpetuate the stereotyped view of nursing as an exclusively women's job." She concluded the opinion by affirming the Court of Appeals decision. Even though, it was obvious MUW violated Hogan rights the court rule a 5-4 decision on July 1 1982. The majority included Justices O’Conner, Brennan, White, Marshall, and Stevens. The Supreme Court clearly had some disparities about gender in education. The ruling did not require MUW to become coed about it forced them to change their admissions policy. However, MUW change their admission policies for all degree levels. In Hogan dissent Justice Powell argued that the