Case: Office Of Faith-Based And Community Initiatives

Decent Essays
Facts of the case: President Bush created the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, which was designed to create a competition between religious charitable associations and non-religious association for federal funding. At these conferences govt. officials including the president Bush gave speeches in order to promote and raise awareness about these organizations. Unhappy with this development, members of Freedom From Religion filed a case arguing that this promotion by government officials violate the Establishment clause.

Supreme Court’s Judgment: Supreme Court ruled that since these programs were funded with discretionary funds (money that Congress s gives the executive branch to use for general administrative purposes), hence

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Lee v. Weisman case is about a middle school principal invited a rabbi to speak at the graduation. Weisman tried to get a temporary restraining order to stop the rabbi from speaking at the graduation. The question is does the inclusion of clergy who offers prayers at public schools ceremonies violate the establishment clause of the first amendment. The decision was it does. Fourth Amendment: Brigham City v. Stuart case is…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4.2 Establishment Clause Does the display of the Ten Commandments in the counties' courthouses violate the Establishment Clause? Yes, the display of Ten Commandments in the McCreary and Pulaski counties courthouses violates the Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution because the clause prohibits federal, state, and local governments form establishing a government-sponsored religion or promoting one religion. In this case, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Kentucky, were aware that it was necessary to have a preliminary injunction, ordering the removal of the Ten comments from both courthouses because it was offensive and discriminatory for those people who are not Christians to be judge by a courthouse who are promoting this particular religion.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobby Lobby’s case argued that their right to religious freedom and beliefs were being violated. They also argued that obligating them to provide contraceptives to their employees violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The RFRA was enacted in 1993 and requires that the government not hinder an individual’s freedom to exercise their religion unless “doing so is the least restrictive way to advance a compelling government interest” (The Economist 1-2). Hobby Lobby argued that obligating corporations to provide their employees with contraception was not the least restrictive way (NWLC…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main two groups involved in this case are the women who believe contraceptives should be given under the affordable care act. The other side consisted of people with strong religious belief that believe ones the egg is fertilized it is alive. The religious group felt protected under the religious freedom restoration act. This act gives them a right to express their religious belief. Both groups that were involved were expected to be involved.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case mentioned is about Chick-Fil-A CEO, Dan T. Cathy, and his statements made about the definition of marriage. I do believe this was a bad decision by him as a leader. In today's world, you are typically guilty by association. Therefore, by the leader of the Chick-Fil-A making the statements about marriage, it looks bad across all sectors of Chick Fil-A. I understand he was using his rights of free speech, but he should have been more careful with what he was voicing to the public.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cambridge Christian School is going to court do defend their right to conduct a 30-second pregame prayer over a loudspeaker after the Florida High School Athletic Association (FHSAA) refused to let them do so during a championship in December. On Sep. 27, CCS sued the FHSAA over the latter’s alleged unlawful censorship of prayer and violation of the religious freedom of the Christian school’s players. First Liberty Institute will represent the school in the federal lawsuit, The Patriot Post details. “This is a case about the restriction of a Christian school’s private speech through a policy and a practice that discriminates between religious and secular speech,” said Atty.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plaintiff wanted to know whether a law that authorizes a period of silence in public schools for "meditation or voluntary prayer" is a violation of the Establishment Clauses? What the Plaintiff really wants is “To suggest that a moment-of-silence statute that includes the word 'prayer' unconstitutionally endorses religion, while one that simply provides for a moment of silence does not, manifests not neutrality but hostility toward religion." The argument of the…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Santa Fe vs. Doe Case The Santa Fe vs. Doe case, which was heard by the United States Supreme Court in the year 2000, is one of the many controversial cases in the US. This case is about the Santa Fe Independent school district whom defends their stand about freedom of speech and freedom of religion against Doe. Many would rule in favor of the school district, but in this case student-initiated prayer before a public-school football game was considered a violation of the Establishment Clause of First Amendment. In Santa Fe, Texas, high school students said a prayer before the high school football games over the school’s public-address system, which such action was seen as offensive by other students, who decided to sue the district.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This Supreme Court is considered to be one of the most controversial and misunderstood decisions made in the history of the Supreme Court. The Engel v. Vitale Supreme Court case tackled the issue on whether or not a school’s nondenominational prayer is a violation of the first amendment. Now the First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lemon Vs Kurtzman

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since the birth of our nation, we have been provided with amendments set in place to protect our freedoms. This set of amendments is known as the bill of rights, and they serve as a guideline for laws so we can determine if they are just or unjust. Since most of the constitution and bill of rights is up to interpretation, there end up being quite a few discrepancies over what the text of these documents actually mean. Because of this we have a Supreme Court that is there to play referee and make the decision over which side is right. In the case of Lemon v. Kurtzman, the plaintiff has claimed that the states of Pennsylvania and Rhode Island have been violating the first amendment’s establishment clause by giving public funds away to church-related…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A part of the First Amendment of the constitution states “[c]ongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” The Establishment Clause intends to prevent any government endorsement or support of religion (Freedom of Religion and the Establishment Clause). Throughout history and different time periods, many contrasting interpretations of this clause have formed. Many court cases have helped develop the meaning the this Clause. The Establishment Clause’s interpretation remains controversial, although numerous tests have helped the Clause itself.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice O’Connor created a third test, the Endorsement test, in Lynch v. Donnelly that was originally meant to clarify the Lemon test, however it has been turned into its own test in recent years. In her concurrence, Justice O’Connor stated, “The proper inquiry under the purpose prong of Lemon, I submit, is whether the government intends to convey a message of endorsement or disapproval of religion”. When treated as its own test, the Endorsement test is concerned with the appearance of legislation and issues. To explores the problem with the Endorsement test, we will explore Zelman v. Simmons-Harris. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris explores the issue of Ohio’s Pilot Project Scholarship Program.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A professed Muslim, Jew, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, Atheist or Agnostic might get a Democratic nomination and, or, a Republican party nomination but they will not get elected as President of the United States. The United States has had 44 Presidents and 43 of them were Protestant. The only President that wasn’t Protestant was John F. Kennedy. He was Roman Catholic and he was assassinated. Although, he hasn’t been the only President who has been assassinated, he has been the only President that wasn’t some from of Protestant believer.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Summary

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Engel v. Vitale extends the reach of the Establishment Clause to include nondenominational and voluntary government supported religious activity. The concurrence expands the Clause further, contending that any kind of public promotion of religion, particularly fiscal support, breaks the Establishment Clause. This case sets a precedent forbidding almost all government-based religious…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SCOTUS cases involving the First Amendment are important to learn about about because they can and will influence how the First Amendment is applied to all citizens. The First Amendment grants everyone the freedom to express their own religious…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays