The case mentioned is about Chick-Fil-A CEO, Dan T. Cathy, and his statements made about the definition of marriage. I do believe this was a bad decision by him as a leader. In today's world, you are typically guilty by association. Therefore, by the leader of the Chick-Fil-A making the statements about marriage, it looks bad across all sectors of Chick Fil-A. I understand he was using his rights of free speech, but he should have been more careful with what he was voicing to the public. He also mentioned that he wants Chick-Fil-A to be established as a Christian organization. One could also argue that this falls under the concept sexual discrimination because some Chick-Fil-A employees might be homosexuals. However, as we learned in Law, Society, and Business, there are no recognized rights or federal statutes that specifically protect …show more content…
However, Denny's was harmed by their own franchisee rather than a CEO. One of their franchises spoke out about the Affordable Care Act regarding health benefits for their employees. As we learned in our Law, Business, and Society, ultimately, the franchisee, not the franchisor controls the restaurant. I like that this article mentioned the fact about the Florida law regarding terms with a franchisor and franchisee. It stated that a, "franchisor has "good cause" to terminate its agreement with a franchisee by showing a substantial threat of injury to its trademark." I thought this was a great point to bring up and it perfectly depicts the