Cultures have different views and traditions about death, and there have been significant debates about the determination of death by neurologic criteria. The acceptance and diagnosis of brain death originates from the Ad Hoc Committee of Harvard Medical School, whom “declared unilaterally that individuals in a state of ‘irreversible coma’… could be declared dead” (2). This concept on death and the role of healthcare providers extends beyond the medical world, as recent development has made it possible to pro-long life through resuscitative and support measures. As a result, it has legally redefined death by setting brain-death, rather than cessation of heart and lung function, as the standard for death. The reluctance in Japan to practice organ harvesting is influenced by their traditional values, which Lock depicts from a case in which a physician “was arrested for murder” following attempts to perform a heart transplant in Sapporo, Hokkaido (8).…
One of the hardest decisions a family with someone who is brain dead has to make is when to stop providing life support. The main purpose of life support is to keep the body alive but, if they are brain dead are they really alive? Huffington Post editorialist, Liz Sabo, explores the differences between states of consciousness and brain death in her post,”The Ethics Of Being Brain Dead: Doctors And Bioethicists Discuss Jahi McMath And Marlise Munoz”. Sabo looks at the different types of treatment for the types of different states of consciousness in order to show that a brain dead person is no longer considered alive.…
The mystery of mortality and death has perplexed humans for centuries. Many individuals question, “What happens when we die?” and “Why do bad things happen to good people?” One asks themselves, who genuinely possesses the right to determine who can live and who must die? Few countries and American states allow legalized participation in physician assisted suicide (PAS) which permits individuals to make the choice regarding whether they live or die based on their inevitable suffering due to disease.…
Death With Dignity: A Commentary Sergej Jagodin Millersville University Medical Aid in Dying: A Commentary The ability to choose when to die is not a topic that is heavily discussed throughout a person’s life. What constitutes dying early and on one’s own terms? Is it moral? Is it right?…
Many wonder if euthanasia is right and moral and if it is not what should be done when being faced with this situation. I think the best way to look at physician-assisted euthanasia is through consequentialism and deontology. It’s important we look at the consequences of physician-assisted suicide because they are literally the difference between life and death. A patient that is gravely ill or in a coma may be diagnosed and given a time limit until death, however, some patients have surprised their doctors.…
The idea of life and death has always been a concept that many people try to avoid, but what happens when a loved one becomes too ill to live? This question has given rise to the idea of euthanasia and Physician-assisted suicide, which although may seem similar, have very different properties. Although physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia both support the belief that one has the right to choose their own fate, the constant backlash in society has limited its practice resulting in the disappearance of a method which, although unorthodox, offer a relief to people suffering from deadly diseases. Euthanasia is “the intentional killing by an act of . . . a dependent human being for his or her benefit” (MCCL.org) and involves two different methods.…
In the hospital, many people are diagnosed as, being brain dead. Some people are put on life support, even though they are legally dead, court cases are fought, won and lost. All so we can put a legally dead person on life support. Is it really worth, the time and money to keep a dead patient alive. Put yourself in the doctor’s position, they have a patient whose heart is working but their brain is completely dead and non-functioning.…
The three questions asked were unique named A, B, and C. The questions were, Is there a Legal Right to Die?, Should the government be involve in patients’ End-of-life Decision –making?, and In the Absence of an Advance Directive, who makes Decisions for incapacitated patients?. Among the 9 subjects, in the status of Hospital administrator group interview conducted with one of the On Duty Administrator and Physician, a spiritual leader, a healthcare colleague, and other five of them were…
If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…
Is Brain Death Really Death? Paige Taylor PM Session Ms. Valerie Wilkinson July 6, 2016 Abstract The concept of “brain death” is complex in terms of clinical evaluation as well as moral and ethical implications. I will examine how brain death is defined; how doctors conclude someone is brain dead; the difference between brain death and a coma; how brain death is occurs; and, if it is reversible.…
The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…
The discussion on physician-assisted death (PAD) and euthanasia has been fenced with controversy whether by the media or in philosophy. Considerably, the arguments that surround this issue has increased periodically due to the fact that health care and medicine has evolved continuously to safeguard not just patients and families, but all health care providers as well. Physician assisted death is “the voluntary termination of one’s own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (Westefeld et al., 2013, p. 539). Oftentimes, PAD is erroneously used interchangeably with euthanasia. According to Dieterle, euthanasia occurs when the active instigator of death is the physician.…
For some, letting go of a love one declared brain dead can be extremely difficult, especially if there are reflexes believed to be responses to familiar voice prompting family members to decide against the removal of mechanical ventilator probably hoping that the patient will regain full consciousness. Unlike patients who are in a persistent vegetative state and may recover but with some limitations, brain death patients have no potential hope of reversible functions (Wijdicks, Varelas, Gronseth, & Greer, 2010), of the entire body. The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) provides the following criteria indicating when an individual should be declared brain dead and in a persistent vegetative state. An individual is considered brain dead when criteria such as; “irreversible cessation of all functions of the entire brain, including the brain stem: coma (with a known cause), absence of brainstem reflexes, and apnea” (Wijdicks et al., 2010), are met. Whereas, a person can be classified as being in a persistent vegetative state when: “A. Acute traumatic and nontraumatic brain injury…, B. degenerative and metabolic disorder of the brain…, and “C. Severe developmental malfunctions of the nervous system”(American Academy of Neurology, 1995), affect the patient’s ability to function.…
The ability to die is inherited by all people at the moment of conception but the legal right to die is a topic most concerning in today’s politics. Andrew D. Sumner, a graduate a Penn State’s College of Medicine in 1990, proposes that individuals should not have the legal right to end their life due to terminal illness or ailment. Approximately 1.2% of American citizens die every year from some form of terminal illness(Guy, Maytal, and Theodore A. Stern 6). Many of those deaths involve excruciating pain from the illness itself and family members suffering over an hourglass that just won 't seem to run out. Denying people the right to chose when they want to pass on their own terms is simply cruel and unjust, not only to the patient, but to the loved ones of the individual.…
Death is a universal word which many people can easily acknowledge, though there are many meanings to it and they can vary with each religion. The most common groups that define it is biblical, philosophical, and medical. In many religions, each have something to say about death and how for some it isn’t the end. An example of this is in the Christian bible, “And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” (Matthew 25:46 ESV) (Robert Driskell).…