Essay On Foetal Personhood

Improved Essays
As the name suggests, the arguments for foetal personhood classified under this label treat the morally significant characteristics, not as intrinsic (essential) but acquired (non-essential) properties of the foetus. In these arguments, the foetus is not a kind of being whose nature is to have by necessity the morally significant characteristics. These characteristics are a possibility in so far as they are only acquired at a particular point in time in the life of the foetus. As non-essential or possible characteristics, these can also be lost in the life of the foetus or a mature adult. If and only if the foetus possesses these characteristics, then it can be qualified as a person. If the foetus does exhibit these characteristics at a particular moment, it follows that it should not be killed at that moment. …show more content…
This qualification for personhood is not related to specie membership, properties, attributes, identities or potentialities as mentioned in earlier cases, but simply rests on the actual possession of the morally significant characteristics. If one can recognize the particular set of characteristics for being considered as a person in an individual entity, then the decision of conferring personhood on that individual entity is straightforward. There are several arguments based on this criterion which propose the kind of characteristics one should look out for in a person. These arguments have one thing in common: foetuses are not person from the beginning but they acquire personhood and become a person at certain point in time. Below, we are going to address six examples how foetuses’ personhood can be interpreted in terms of acquired personhood. Then we propose two versions of personhood argument by Warren and Tooley, following with the Boonin's improved desire

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Because of the moral standards of society, abortions are becoming a more controversial issue. In this paper, I intend to argue against Don Marquis’s argument that a fetus’ having a potential “future just like ours” is a sufficient statement for claiming that “abortion is, except possibly in rare cases, seriously immoral, that it is in the same category as killing an innocent human being” (p.183). I will first explain Marquis’ “future just like ours” theory which is used to prove his argument that abortion is wrong. While Marquis claims that a future is a natural property that is attached to fetuses and any human beings, I want to argue that there is a difference between future and the natural property. Second, I want to argue against his statement…

    • 1515 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First we must decide if the fetus is indeed a person or not. Munson states, “The claim of the fetus as a person must be given weight and respect in deliberating about any action that would terminate its life” (Munson, p. 456). If we rule that a fetus is a person, then abortion would be a case of unjust killing (Munson, p.456). So, if a fetus is a person it, like all human beings, has the right to life and one without harm. This relates back to cases like that of Tabita Bricci.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These include the ability to feel pain, reason, participate in self-motivated activity, communicate, and be self-aware. While originally when I read this article, I was not convinced by Warren’s argument, the more I studied the material I understood where she was coming from. She did clarify that a “person” does not have to show all of these traits and not one of them is absolutely necessary to be considered a “person.” Her story about a space explorer coming across extraterrestrial life and then trying to apply the criteria to the lifeform to determine personhood helped me understand the criteria and where her argument was going. (Warren 341) Judith Thomson also presents a compelling argument in favor of abortion in “A Defense of Abortion.”…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is often a large dispute over abortion and when personhood begins. Some believe it is at fertilization, some think that it is a vague concept, and some believe that it is when the child is born. The common argument against abortion is the claim that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. A philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thomson, believes that even if personhood begins at the stage of being a fetus, there are still times when it is moral to abort the fetus. She believes that personhood begins at a vague time, however she wants to prove even if the fetus is a person, she can provide times when it is still morally permissible to have an abortion.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson’s and Marquis’ Views on Abortion The subject of abortion is a highly controversial topic, with each side firmly believing that the opposing view is prima facie immoral. Much discussion regarding abortion is focused on whether or not a fetus can be categorized as a person. Many assume that if a fetus is labeled as a person, then it would be wrong to kill it; however, if a fetus has not reached personhood, then it should be fine to end its life. Judith Thomson decides to circumvent this discussion, realizing that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to determine at which point a fetus becomes a person with a right to life.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She claims that the fetus has none of these characteristics of a person in the early stages of development, and thus it is not a person with moral rights in those stages. She suggested that fetus would to meet certain criteria’s. Sentience is defined as persons who have capacity for conscious experience, including experience of pain and pleasure. Emotionality deals with feelings. Reason is a person being able to solve problems using their minds.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glover, CC 77). He identifies that personhood starts when one develops self-consciousness because the level of cognition is vital to differentiate human beings from other species. For this reason, Glover asserts that a fetus is not considered a person due to the absence of consciousness; thus, it is morally permissible to abort it. For example, a human being in a coma state is also not considered a person, for he/she has lost all self-consciousness, which restrains him/her from doing anything; therefore, it is considered a vegetable (7. Doppelt,…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one of his points he mentions the innocent-human-life perspective which states the syllogism “1. All innocent human beings have the right to life, 2. All human fetuses are innocent human beings, 3. Therefore, all human fetuses have the right to life.”. Another one of his points when arguing with singer Mary Anne Warren who stated “being a person in terms of the traits of consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, the capacity to communicate, and the presence of self-concepts, nothing, too, that her characterization of personhood” a person must have these at least some of these in order to be consider a person and therefore fetus’s lack the right to life because they don’t have these traits.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people tend to focus their argument on the life of the fetus without putting no value to the life of the mother. Personhood is the condition of being an individual person, aware of self, and be able to think. Fetus does not have consciousness, cannot think, and is dependent to the mother, therefore, it is not constitute as a person. The Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution does not include the unborn as a person. Every choice we make in life comes with a decision which is governed by individual rights.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Living in a world filled with people of different cultures, religions, and personalities, it is impossible to think that with every situation that presents itself in American that mutual agreement upon it will be made. In the news, we constantly hear debates about gay-marriage, police brutality, racism, and many other incidents in America that bring out the inner activists of our people. Most debates over these controversies are no surprise to the public because they have been going on for years. One in particular is the debate about abortions. Since 1973, the world has been divided into two distinct groups of “Pro-life” and “Pro-choice” due to the landmark case of Roe v. Wade.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion is a growing controversial issue in the world today, mainly in the United States. “Abortion is one the most common medical performed in the United States each year” (Suzann, 1). The issue has become more prominent as years’ progress for a variety of reasons, to include the fact that the “traditional” family’s existence is fading. Abortion became legalized during the Roe v Wade case in 1973, now a little over one million abortions are performed each year. Women are becoming undesirably pregnant at alarming rates, many who feel they are unable to effectively take care of a child.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this were not true, there would be no need to even talk about rights of personhood. " Removing a fetus" would be the moral equivalent of pulling a tooth.” Some argue that a fetus is a person, therefore making them “pro-life”. Alternatively, “pro-choice” denotes the approach that a fetus is not a person until it reaches a certain stage of development.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Lee’s and Robert P. George’s, On The Wrong of Abortion, it is argued that abortions are objectively immoral. To support this conclusion, Lee and George state that, the fetus is a complete person in an immature phase of development, that the fetus has the potential to develop into a “person” and that abortions are intentional killings. Pro-Choice defenders argue that a human fetus is not a human being because it cannot live on its own, that they are not ‘people’, and that the mother has the executive decision of not wanting the child in her uterus. According to Patrick Lee in another one of his works, The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defence. Bioethics , He claims that “What makes it wrong to kill you or me now would…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren presents her argument for abortion, first, by replying to Thomson’s argument with falsehoods she gathered from his premises. The largest opposition Warren had with Thompson, was based upon the statement he made that allowed for abortion to be permissible even if the fetus has a full right to life. Warren argues that there cannot be an argument for abortion if it is believed that a fetus has a full right to life, because an abortion would immediately dismiss this. In Warren’s argument, she focuses heavily on defining personhood and the moral status that coincides with it, and the lack of both in a fetus. I am going to argue on behalf of Warren, however adding the argument that a fetus does not have full moral status, while an infant does, in hopes to respond to the issue of infanticide.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When looking at human life from a moral point of view, can a fetus be considered a…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays