Arguments Against Federalism

Improved Essays
When we look at Federalism, we can comprehend that our nation was structured in such a way that it separated powers from the government level and the state level. Federalism was a good way to prevent tyranny in our country, otherwise our country would be a third world country. When it comes to immigration reform within a state or our country, there will need to be certain limitations to the process of illegal immigration. States should have final say as to what takes place in their state and not have the government try to impede on their actions. For instance, we are seeing sanctuary cities pop up in the news because an illegal immigrant has caused great harm to an american citizen. As I highly disagree with the sanctuary cities, this should be an area that government should have provisions set to assure states follow the law by which our very government should enforce and assure that all states follow the law. …show more content…
When our constitution was made, our Founding Fathers assured that government did not have too much control and power. Federalism is a mediator of the state and government levels by separating the powers between the two and letting the people of that state voice be heard through its local elections. When it comes to making laws within my state, I would support a conservative approach of enforcing voter id laws, limiting governments over reach on certain issues that the state can handle, putting a stop to immigrants coming to the US to give birth solely for the reason of staying without going through the proper steps of becoming a citizen of the United States. We are a nation of laws and should follow the very laws associated with illegal immigration or any other issue that confronts our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism has a history of preserving segregation and slavery, powers are shared amongst national, provincial and state governments so gave the southern states power to form their own laws obtaining slaves. As well as, states urge to compete with each other in a hostile way. By the time, compressing the quantity of benefits they permit to people who receive welfare related to a bordering state, gripping the unnecessary mob to go to the neighboring state, so that they can decrease their welfare dues even more. This reduction of state benefits to the penniless has been called the ‘race to the bottom.’ In addition, federalism allows the inequality of the states.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the Federalist Papers Publius claims that for the United States to work it needs an extended republic given by the Constitution and that any other form of government will not work. Those who oppose the new Constitution, the Anti-Federalists, claim that the new constitution will erode liberty and destroy the government. The Anti-Federalists present several arguments against the Constitution, but Publius quickly and easily shoots them down to show the necessity of an extended republic and how other options for fixing the government simply will not do. One argument against the Constitution, given by the Federalist Farmer argues that, “wealth, office, and the benefits of government would collect in the centre: and the extreme states and their principal towns would become much less important” (CP 44). Agrippa makes a similar argument…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As one may have guessed I am representative of a large, southern state with a liquid capital, who is an Anti-Federalist. I have seen first hand what a powerful national government can do, and I simply do not understand how some Federalists, such as Pierce, actually want to model our government after the English. Power should be spread out, and while it might make a government less efficient, it protects the people's natural rights. A national government exists to protect the people. It should provide order, welfare, and protection from anything trying to impede on the people's natural rights...including itself.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thakur 4 Devendrasinh Thakur Professor Sharifian GOVT-2306-73011 May 7, 2017 Government Control over Texas Every country has different types of controls over different individual states. That is the reason every single state varies from another one. In United States, government trying to get control over many different states due to different types of laws and regulations. We all know that there some bans going on all over to the Texas.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America, people have certain freedoms that cannot be infringed upon by the government, and they are liberties that some people from other countries are not entitled to have. These unalienable rights of the American people are specifically stated in the Bill of Rights found in the U.S. Constitution. In 1789, a year after the Constitution was ratified, a draft of the Bill of Rights was proposed, and it contained ten amendments, which would be added to the Constitution. In 1789, the Bill of Rights was finally ratified and resolved the huge debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. One of their debates was over the necessity of the bill, which the Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton, believed it unnecessary to write it on the…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalist Analysis

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the concerns of the Anti-Federalists is that people would prioritize their own social class. This is one of the reasons they are so concerned with elitism. The Federalists argue that this is not the case, “Is it not natural that a man who is a candidate for the favor of the people and who is dependent on the suffrages of his fellow citizen for the continuance of his public honors should take care to inform himself of their dispositions and inclinations and should be willing to allow them their proper degree of influence upon his conduct?... [There are] strong chords of sympathy between the representatives and the constituent.” (Federalist 37, 219).…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This coercive federalism has happened more than often in the past and looks like it will happen more in the future as well. Not only are these regulations imposed on the states by the federal government, but they are levied on the states with the use of leverage in the form of threats to defend other federally funded programs in use by the states. These new policies are not just forced on the states are also not even funded by the federal government. For example, when the federal Americans with disabilities act was passed that required street curbs to be accessible to wheelchairs, the federal government did not provide the funds to pay for the curbs. The states and local government were left with the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To create well operating Government, with content citizens, there needs to be a balance of power. Federalism has the ability to stop racist, homophobic, and discriminative laws created by the states. Yet, federalism also has the ability to become more centralized and lose focus and control over the different states. For example, during a Macro Economics lecture last semester the professor stated, under the Soviet Union a Russian nail factory once received orders to create a certain amount of weight in nails. However, the workers didn’t create multiple nails and instead created one large nail weighing the correct amount.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Had I been alive during the debate over ratification of the Constitution, I believe that I would have been an Antifederalist. The Federalists pushed for the ratification of the Constitution without a bill of rights. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, did not want to ratify the Constitution because it did made the government too strong and didn’t protect the rights of the people. The Anti-Federalists were anti-British and pro-French and called for a smaller government that didn’t have as much power over the people. I think that if I was alive during the debate over the Constitution, I wouldn’t have been a strong Anti-Federalist, but I definitely would not have been a Federalist.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Anti Federalists

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the time of when the constitution was being created, there was a big debate between being an anti-federalist or being a federalist. If I were alive when the debate was going on, I would consider myself as an anti-federalist. Anti-federalists think that the national government had too much power and that states should have more power. They worked hard to get states more rights. The Bill of Rights to anti-federalists was important to the Constitution to promise individual rights.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Would you want the small state to vote to against something that does not affect them and it does not get passed because the smaller states are overpowering? Of course…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Americans take a lot of pride and feel a big connection in their home state, federalism which in turn keeps that connection by giving power to the states. One advantage of a policy that must be implemented by one agency of the federal bureaucracy is the bureaucrats that are the experts in bureaucracy. Bureaucrats put government policy into practice, and therefore the federal bureaucracy has a large impact on policymaking. The bureaucrats that set up the policies are the experts that know much more about the policy issues than anyone else and this creates bureaucracy power. One disadvantage is president cannot monitor every group within the bureaucracy; so much of what bureaucrats does goes unnoticed.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Until this very day, arguments between state and federal governments are still arising. The issue yet to be solved if the federal government should be able to control all matters, even foreign ones over the state government. The state government will not take no for an answer though. States until this day, have continued to fight against issues they feel they have the right to regulate. Even though I believe that states should have more power than they already do.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between the State and Federal governments is complex and they are broken up into many different parts. Also the State and Federal Governments have different amounts of influence over the economy and the citizens. Another thing is that the government system and relationship between the two is very complex and controversial. This paper will discuss the relationship between the State and Federal governments and the complexity of the systems of government.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays