Arguments Against Federalism

Improved Essays
Until this very day, arguments between state and federal governments are still arising. The issue yet to be solved if the federal government should be able to control all matters, even foreign ones over the state government. The state government will not take no for an answer though. States until this day, have continued to fight against issues they feel they have the right to regulate. Even though I believe that states should have more power than they already do. The federal government continues to grow, and it causes for state governments to step up to the plate. Although federalism was not the first government, there were other governments that were put to the test first. Federalism did have a rough start but, was resolved with the Bill …show more content…
This system works to set up a stronger national government with distinguished power left to the state governments. An argument over who should have the most power was between the federalist and the anti-federalists. The anti-federalist was more concerned about answering to the people. Federalists, Alexander Hamilton and, James Madison had written eighty-five papers to defend the Constitution. The two papers that stood out the most was no. 10 and no. 51. No. 10 had explained that a stronger national government can protect liberty more than the small local governments could. No. 51 brought forth the separation of powers. It set up the three branches: the executive, legislative and, the judiciary. As for the federalist, their argument was that having a national government would help to defend the people’s rights better and, believed it would make the nation stronger. This argument was then settled and, led to a new constitution. The Bill of Rights which consists of ten amendments that lay out the rights that citizens are promised to …show more content…
States authority is listed in the 10th amendment. States have what is called reserved powers which guarantee that states can adjust the government authority to their pleasing so that it is not controlled by the national government. Meaning they have the power to regulate some issues within their state. Such as regulating the schooling and education, giving protection such as the police, levying taxes, building roads and, distributing public health. States’ focus on what best suits their people and how they can make their state better for the individuals within their state. States’ authority is listed in the 10th amendment. But they do have to share powers with the national government as well, this type of process is called concurrent powers. The constitution also needs the state government to follow the full faith and credit clause which is where states must recognize and uphold laws that are passed by other states. The full faith and credit clause is written in article four section one. Although states do not have the power to negotiate treaties with other foreign countries, coin their own money or even create their own

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    During the constitutional convention, the federalist and the anti-federalist went head to head trying to create new laws for government. Many articles were written by James Madison; these articles were the federalist papers. Within these paper, Madison outlines that the constitution protects against tyranny by dividing power between state and government, by separating government into branches, having a checks and balances system, and having equal state representation among the states. In document A, James Madison states that power is “First divided between two distinct governments, state and federal.” This describes the idea of federalism, where state and federal governments share power; powers like declaring war and printing money belong…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the summer of 1787, the United States was challenged to create a stronger central government without letting one person or group have too much power. There were flaws in the Articles of Confederation and the government wasn’t getting anything done. The fifty-five representatives wanted to create a Constitution that divided up powers to avoid the tyranny that they escaped from by becoming an independent nation. The Constitution guarded against tyranny in many ways, such as Federalism, creating equality for big and small states, separation of powers by creation of branches, and checks and balance between the branches.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The court can declare state regulations unconstitutional if deem to be unreasonable on interstate commerce. Federal preemption gives congress the power to regulate an entire field even if no conflict exists between state and federal…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When the founding fathers were writing the constitution, there was much debate as to how strong they would allow the central government to become. For the Anti-Federalists in particular, it was important that the Constitution ensured the oppression the Americans had experienced under British rule could not be repeated. The purpose of Madison writing Federalist No. 51 was to convince Anti-Federalists, particularly those concentrated in New York, that the constitution would prevent the government from becoming too strong. If it were not ensured that the three branches of government would be independent of one another, and that a checks and balances system would be in place, it would have been more difficult for the constitution to have been ratified.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the case of the United States, there exists a constitutional republic in which the Constitution rules as the supreme law of the land and the Constitution empowers and limits those in office. Both the federalists and anti-federalists agreed on the fact that indeed, liberty and security of rights should be the end goal of this new republic, but disagreed on how this government should go about achieving that goal. The new constitutional republic presented two major contentions to the anti-federalists: 1. This new form of government had too strong of a national character and threatened the sovereignty of the individual states simply due to the enormous size of the proposed republic. 2.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Luke Stafford PS 110 7/21/15 States and Federal Government Rights Does the Federal government have too much control? Is the Federal Government oppressive to the people and States of America? Or are states’ rights well protected in the constitution and political practice? To answers any of these questions, we need to look back and see what the Constitution is and the path that was taken by the founders to where we ended up with the Constitution.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Anti-Federalists

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During the great debate over the ratification of the American Constitution in 1787, two groups, Federalists and Anti-Federalists, were extremely concerned with the safeguarding of liberty. However, these two groups absolutely disagreed whether or not a strong national government would uphold or ultimately annihilate the liberty of the American people. The Federalists supported the Constitution and a stronger national government. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, opposed the final ratification of the U.S. Constitution that embraced the creation of a much stronger centralized federal government. The Anti-Federalists preferred a national government that had bestowed the majority of power to the state governments.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    States may not make treaties with other countries or with other states, issue money, levy duties on imports or exports, maintain a standing army or navy, or make war. (Paletz, Owen and Cook 86). Concurrent power, which federal and state governments share are taxing and borrowing money, regulating elections, and establishing courts. Even with this distribution between federal and state governments, the national government has multiple responsibilities to the states, they cannot deny the equal representation of any state in the Senate, state’s borders can’t altered without the consent of the state, defend any state should they request it, and guarantee each state “a republican form of government” (Paletz, Owen and Cook…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From 1787-1790 the American Constitution was debated by two opposing political philosophies named the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist were in favor of the newly formed Constitution while the Anti-Federalists objected the new constitution believing that the central government seized too much power by creating a single national government forcing the first Congress to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated. The most significant topic of the debate the participation of the people in voting for ratification of the constitution. Pauline Maier in her article Take This or Nothing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, illustrates reason the constitution was ratified…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America, people have certain freedoms that cannot be infringed upon by the government, and they are liberties that some people from other countries are not entitled to have. These unalienable rights of the American people are specifically stated in the Bill of Rights found in the U.S. Constitution. In 1789, a year after the Constitution was ratified, a draft of the Bill of Rights was proposed, and it contained ten amendments, which would be added to the Constitution. In 1789, the Bill of Rights was finally ratified and resolved the huge debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. One of their debates was over the necessity of the bill, which the Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton, believed it unnecessary to write it on the…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists had the better argument overall because they had clear instances showing how a strong central government could become corrupt and lose interest in its citizens. They wanted the power to stay in the states because it would allow more control over what was happening within the nation and it would give citizens more protected rights. In the end, after several debates between the groups, they agreed on creating the Bill of Rights, which gave the citizens protected rights. In addition, they agreed on forming one central government that was made up of three branches, all with restricted powers because of the checks and balances between them.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since America's beginning, there have been multiple conflicts over the respective roles of national and state governments. In fact, the Civil War was actually fought over questions of states' rights. These question included: Can a state create a law that allows for slavery? and Does a state have the right to secede from the Union? Even today we still disagree on power when it comes to the federal government and the state governments.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The relationship between the federal government and the states is fragile. While the federal have the ability to control anything they want, the states get to control whatever the federal government does not. This sets up the federal part to have complete control. Yes, the states may have the power but when it gets into the federal system, the states cannot do anything about it. As you will find out in many of our Founding Fathers documents, they had the wits to be able to split what the federal and state governments get to control.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The State government runs the state that it is in and they are a higher level of government than the local level, which controls whatever city of county that they are in. One of the State government’s roles is to promote the state’s economy and take control over a lot of the government programs, such as risk and social management programs (Norman, 2008). Also just like how the Federal government controls the State government, the State government controls and watches over the the Local government’s of the State’s counties and cities. Another added power that the states have is that the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution states that any and all powers that aren’t under the Federal government’s control is then reserved to later be put under the states and it’s people. All state governments are complex and exact duplicates of the federal government and are made up of three different branches of government; executive, legislative, and judicial.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays