Debate Between Federalists Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
In America, people have certain freedoms that cannot be infringed upon by the government, and they are liberties that some people from other countries are not entitled to have. These unalienable rights of the American people are specifically stated in the Bill of Rights found in the U.S. Constitution. In 1789, a year after the Constitution was ratified, a draft of the Bill of Rights was proposed, and it contained ten amendments, which would be added to the Constitution. In 1789, the Bill of Rights was finally ratified and resolved the huge debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. One of their debates was over the necessity of the bill, which the Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton, believed it unnecessary to write it on the …show more content…
They are five freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition (Monk 127). People have the right to speak, meaning they cannot be stopped from communicating their opinions or ideas. Freedom of religion allows people to believe and practice any faith they desire, but that does not harm others. This is one thing that colonists wanted when they traveled from Britain to North America. People’s religion was reprimanded. Freedom of press is referring to the printed word, such as through newspapers, books, or other texts. Freedom of assembly allows people to assemble and that is something colonist seek when the British Parliament had forbid the colonists to assemble. Freedom of petition is the last freedom listed in the first amendment, which is the right for citizens to petition (Monk …show more content…
For example, there have been many court cases that deal with religion in education. Court cases such as Engel v. Vitale, Abington School District v. Schempp, and Lee v. Weisman. In 1992, the Supreme Court case Lee v. Weisman in which it ruled that in graduation ceremonies, prayers could not be conducted because it was unconstitutional (Monk 132). These laws were the involvement of freedom of religion. Education is not influenced by religion and students have the right to practice what they wish and are not made to practice a religion in public schools. Another example where it involved freedom of religion is the Supreme Court case Reynolds v. United States, which it was the first time the Free Exercise Clause was dealt with (Monk 134). Reynolds argues that his right to practice his Mormon faith was being infringed upon, but the Federal law prohibited Polygamy (Monk 134). It violated the Constitution, the Court overruled (Monk 134). Thus, this is where freedom of religion was tested because people may have the freedoms, but people’s acts cannot harm anyone or violate the Constitution. Moreover, freedom of speech was tested in the court case Texas v. Johnson in 1989. In this Supreme Court case, the Court rules that burning the U.S. flag was protected by the First Amendment (Monk 139). The Texas law said that this act of burning the flag offended other people, and what Gregory Lee Johnson did outside the 1984

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gregory Johnson Case

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Johnson was prosecuted for flag desecration that violated a state statute. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Johnson’s conviction, and held that flag burning was an expression of speech. Texas appealed to the Supreme Court (O’Brien 702). 3. Questions of the Court Is flag burning protected by the First Amendment?…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist papers were written in attempt to get citizens to ratify the United States Constitution in 1787, and more specifically the citizens of New York. Eighty-five essays made up the Federalist papers. When citizens were reviewing the United States Constitution the Federalists papers basically guided them through it and helped people to understand how the Constitution should be interpreted as well as where the ideas came from. In the first paper we were assigned, Federalist number 10, James Madison argued that if you wanted a satisfactory economy the Partisan democracy is not the best idea to get that.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist Papers are a collection of 85 articles published periodically in the The Independent Journal and The New York Packet between 1787 and 1788. These articles were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, all writing under the pseudonym Publius, in order to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. Throughout the articles, Hamilton, Madison, and Jay argued the merits of the Constitution and how it proved stronger than the Articles of Confederation. Federalist nos.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The First Amendment and Texas vs. Johnson The First Amendment states that the government cannot force religion on the people, or not allow the people to practice certain religions. Also, the government cannot take away the right to freedom of speech, press, the right to gather peaceably, or petition the government for their problems or complaints. The first Amendment and Texas vs. Johnson both focus a lot on freedom of speech. In the First Amendment freedom of speech is just one of the listed freedoms, but people can interpret that in many different ways.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case was eventually partially overruled by the Supreme Court in Brandenburg v. Ohio but officially secured that free speech could be drastically limited. Oyez states, the “The Court used a two-pronged test to evaluate speech acts: (1) speech can be prohibited if it is ‘directed at inciting or producing imminent lawless action’ and (2) it is ‘likely to incite or produce such action’” (Oyez). Thus, the limitations of free speech in Brandenburg v. Ohio were solidified and displays how the effects of Schenck v. United States inadvertently affected many prominent court cases Overall, Schenck v. United States illustrates how one case limited the scope of the 1st amendment's free speech. Along the way, the court case paved the way for other court cases to be settled upon Schenck v. United States results, all of which solidified the deprivation of rights.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Constitutional Convention of 1786, one of the most important compromises of the early United States was the Great Compromise. Another compromise that happened at the Constitutional Convention was the Three-Fifths Compromise. These two compromises helped to establish the early government issues of the nation. Together these compromises allowed America to become united.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists The feud between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist party was based on the ratification of the Constitution. Even though both groups believed that the principal purpose of government is to secure individual rights and that the best instrument for that purpose is some form of limited republican government. They also agreed that the individual has the right to do anything that the government has no power to keep him from doing.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Near v. Minnesota case, the supreme Court ruled that the First amendment protected against prior restraint. This case deals with a man named J.M. Near. Near was a resident of the state of Minnesota, he was the publisher of a newspaper called "the Saturday Press. " The content of the newspaper was thought to be racist, prejudiced, and hateful. Due to the spread of the hateful speech being released into the public, Near was then taken into custody by the state.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments of the Constitution. It was created to exclude governmental power to citizen rights. The Bill of Rights, is a protection for an individual’s liberty. Built for a person’s freedom of speech, religion, and press. It arranges rules for due process of law and reserves all power not substituted to the Federal Government, to the people or the states, but imagine if the government stops granting you those rights, striping them away from you.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The conflict between Federalists and Anti-Federalists has been in existence since 1789, while not defined immediately, federalists were those who supported a strong central government and argued in favor of the constitution. Anti-federalists favored the rights of the state and vouched for a decentralized government, they were relentless to give up already-existing powers the states had, allowed by the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 62 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Freedom of Speech? The Merriam-Webster dictionary define freedom of speech as “the right to express facts and opinions subject only to reasonable limitations (as the power of the government to protect itself from a clear and present danger) guaranteed by the 1st and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution and similar provisions of some state constitutions”. Freedom of speech is ones right to say what you please without fear of being punished, is among one of the most treasured freedoms throughout America. The founders of the United States government tried to protect our liberty by assuring a free press, to gather and publish information without being under control or power of another, in the First Amendment to the Constitution. As we know, the Supreme Court plays an important role in the subject of free speech and expression, and we need to understand that…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Goals

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The bill of rights is a huge part of achieving America’s goals. The bill of rights gave us the freedom of speech, freedom of press, and freedom of religion. To this day we still have these rights. Everyone has different religions in the united states, everyone is allowed to speak about anything, and people are allowed to write about any news they want. These rights can be revoked if the person takes away another’s rights.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SCOTUS cases involving the First Amendment are important to learn about about because they can and will influence how the First Amendment is applied to all citizens. The First Amendment grants everyone the freedom to express their own religious…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays