Argumentative Summary: Buying A Gun Does Not Make You Safe
Not being more effective than other things makes a gun useless. (warrant for premise #3) This is a bad assumption because they are still useful, If they are equal in effectiveness what is the logical difference? This could also be looked at from the point of view that a gun can cause more harm and therefore should provide better protection for the added risk; and if it doesn’t provide more protection there are better options after considering the pros and cons.
Hurting your family is bad. (warrant for premise #4) Everyone should agree with this, if not they need mental help.
Criminals getting guns is a bad thing. (warrant for premise #5) Most people should agree with this, except criminals.
Crime is directly related to your safety. This assumption is not true, there are many types of crime, most never involving your safety at all.
The studies and statistics hold true for all places in America. Tho reasonable this can not be true, there are going to be some cases where guns can benefit one person more than others and actually be …show more content…
He is so sure he is right on the topic he talks down to the other side. He clearly argues that guns are never a better choice which is not true because there are always exceptions to blanket claims like that. Guns can protect you and because of that Premise #4 without evidence is almost attacking gun owners saying they are either negligent or mentally unstable to the point of potentially killing themselves or others. Premise #5 is unfair to gun owners because he basically says their fund will be stollen and used by criminals. Logical fallacies Slippery slope: The statement that gun theft is the main pathway that criminals get guns implies that owning a gun will lead to it being stolen and used by criminals. This implication is a slippery slope because the likelihood of owning a gun then having it stollen then having it used by criminals is proceeding too far down a list of possibilities. Ad Hominem: He makes the opposing side of the argument seem weaker by making it seem the other side consists purely of people who do not know what there talking about through the use of