Argumentative Essay-Gun Control Does Not Fire Away

Improved Essays
Gun Control: Do NOT Fire Away When teenagers Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold opened fire on their students at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999 they struck fear into the hearts of parents and schoolchildren nationwide. By the time the pair committed suicide, 12 of their classmates and one teacher lay dead. It was, at the time, the deadliest school shooting in American history, creating a cloud of fear that hung-over schools around the country. But the massacre did not result in changes to America's gun control policies. A month after the shooting, the Senate narrowly passed a bill requiring background checks for firearm sales at gun shows, with Vice President Al Gore casting the deciding vote. The bill, which also required child …show more content…
But the case made for that "something" is almost entirely based on emotion, not reason. The hard truth is that none of the proposals that politicians and commentators have made -- about guns, mental health, broken homes, cultural failings, violence in mass media, and so on -- could have prevented this awful crime or any other similar crime yet to take place. No law can make the murderously insane sane or remove the ability to destroy innocent life from the hands of every mentally ill American. The problem, which is the actual guns that are sold to the public, is beyond these issues and from within the right to bear arms. There is a problem that clearly goes well beyond mass shootings. The mass shootings get the headlines but we’re losing dozens of lives to gunshots every day. And those don’t get the attention that mass shootings do. Americans are very good at excuse making. That is, when they hear of, let’s say the Newtown shooting, they think, ‘Well, we heard the facts of that one. He was mentally disturbed and well, gee, you know, not much could be done to prevent that.’ Or we when hear about the theater shooting in Alabama, they say, ‘Oh yeah, that guy was very angry and mentally disturbed. And nothing could have been done to prevent that guy from getting a gun, so there’s nothing we can do.” Or they say, ‘it’s mental illness and not the gun.’ Excuses are made but then never get around to dealing …show more content…
The numbers include everything from homicides and multiple-victim gang assaults to incidents of self-defense and accidental shootings. The organization’s records show that more than 12,600 people have been killed with guns this year, but what its numbers do not record — due to government reporting practices — is a massive hole in the data: the nearly 20,000 Americans who end their lives with a gun each year. Nor does its already high injury tally capture the full extent of the victims who continue life with debilitating wounds and crushing medical bills. It does however, mention the amount of deaths due to self-defense, which is gun advocates’ main argument, that record to about 1,500, a significantly low rate compared to deaths due to guns. With a ratio of 1.5: 8.3, excluding suicide

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the wake of the tragedy at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida many protests have taken the forefront of the mainstream media. It can be argued that stricter gun laws are the answer. That is simply not the case. No mass shooters are not mentally sane. Stricter mental health laws are the answer.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this New York Times article Erik Eckholm uses mass shootings such as the Columbine, Virginia tech and Sandy Hook shootings to demonstrate the need for stricter gun laws. The writing of this article was sparked by the most recent shooting in Roseburg, Oregon. By using these tragedies along with very supportive statistics he is able to persuade the reader to believe that the current laws and restrictions simply are not enough. 90 people a day are killed by guns, two thirds of that statistic are suicides. This goes to show that Eckholm understands that sometimes “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    School Shootings Are Not Enough for Stronger Gun Control Laws The Jonna Semeiks article “We the People Confront Sandy Hook” discuses many different factors that contribute towards explaining why school shootings and gun violence are inadequate to inspire stronger gun control laws. The deaths of children are not enough to offset the strong ties that American society has towards guns as a symbol of freedom, which causes people to respond with internal defense mechanisms that numb the pain of these tragic events instead of feeling a need to take corrective action. Semeiks presents a valid point that gun control reforms are needed; however, in order for that to happen anytime soon, the American people will need to largely shift their attitude on this topic. The author provides several examples successfully supporting that main idea.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Imagine a typical day in a small suburban town in southwestern Virginia. It’s around 9:00 am, and you are in your French class. Then, all of sudden, you hear banging noises coming from outside your classroom. This is the true story of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University shooting in April 2007 as told by Colin Goddard. Goddard was shot four times by the gunman: three bullets to the hips and one bullet to the shoulder.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Do Guns Save Lives

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages

    People know that guns can cost lives because the media repeat this message endlessly, as if we could not figure it out for ourselves. But even someone who reads newspapers regularly and watches numerous television newscasts may never learn that guns also save lives. The honest measure of the protective benefits of guns are the lives saved, the injuries prevented, the medical costs saved, and the property protected. Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of the Second Amendment, one controversial issue has been whether the Founding Fathers considered the future use of guns. On the one hand, the federal government argues for stricter regulations towards people who bear arms. On the contrary, the people of the state contend that our rights shall not be infringed. With respect to both parties, stricter gun laws are needed to protect American’s from massacres. Guns were created for one purpose and one purpose only, to kill.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Debunking the “Guns Don’t Kill People, People Kill People” Myth." Armed With Reason. 8 Oct. 2013. Web. 14 Oct. 2015. Pearson, Michael. "…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Bad Idea Americans dote on guns. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " Many people take advantage of the Second Amendment.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Suicides Essay

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Between the years 2000 and 2013 the amount of deaths by guns in America exceeded the amount of deaths caused by AIDS, drugs, wars, and terrorism combined. Even more shocking than this statistic is how unique this issue is to the United States. In the United States there are 29.7 homicides for every 1 million people. Switzerland, with the second highest rate in the world, has only 7.7. It is not that Americans are just more violent individuals, in fact the US ranks far below first for crimes rates other than gun violence (Lopez).…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control is a topic that divides the opinions of the United States citizens and creates endless discussions that until now has not reached a conclusion. The United States has faced many mass shootings during the last years making the supporters of gun control want a reform even more. Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States every year. The United States leads the world with more gun-related homicides and suicides than any other country, according to a 2016 study conducted by the American Journal of Medicine. (“Gun Control”).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is to control the gun use by humans by not letting them have outrages guns and to be stricter by the police force about it. The public keeps on being remembered about this conflict because of all the massacres that have happened due to guns. People should care more about this because it is one of the leading tragedies that are happening in the United States. Some ways that we can control the number of massacres with guns are reducing the size of gun allowed to be bought by the public, reducing the number of guns allowed by a person, and stores should be allowed to have a small gun. A way that can help gun control is to reduce the size of guns allowed to be bought by the public.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Journal of Public Health released a statement saying, “legal purchase of a handgun appears to be associated with a long lasting increased risk of violent death” (“Gun” par. 11). By strengthening laws and deepening background checks the deaths of possible victims could be prevented in the…

    • 1255 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control People in America have guns and are carrying them to the public and some bought their guns illegally. For every 100 people there are 88.8 guns owned or about 270,000,000 guns in America. Some people that own guns, 78% of men 80% of women in America, feel safer when having a gun with them. For this reason, a survey in 1993 when 34% of people in America wanted gun rights protected and 57% people wanted gun ownership controlled.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although most have taken place in the United States and not Canada, the shootings have still caused a major effect on children, teenagers and young adults who are attending school all around the world; as well as teachers and others working with them. Some are even afraid to go to school on the days following a massacre elsewhere. These terrible attacks have resulted in hundreds of deaths and injuries, yet all could have been prevented of the one thing that caused these tragic fates did not exist. Even if a portion of the shooters in these situations were mentally ill, it is no exception that all of the gunmen, especially the young ones, should not have been able to get ahold of any type of gun. If there was not a weapon as deadly as the gun, there would not result in such a large amount of innocent deaths every year.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays