Argument Analysis: The Trolley's Dilemma

Improved Essays
What is the correct moral judgement?

Our choices, our decisions, and, consequently, our lives, are influenced and determined by our perspective of morality and logic. Using both combined, we can achieve an ethical and rational outcome to any problem. However, despite morality being so important; few people take the time to develop their own sense of morality, and fewer still apply it to a situation any further than their current emotion. And so, I ask, what is the correct moral decision?

Before we begin, I would like to highlight some important things about morality. Firstly, that there is no universal agreement about the morality of our decision, a problem that arises from a concept called “moral relativism”. Essentially, the idea states that rather than morals being objective, each individual’s morals are relative to their social, cultural, historical and personal circumstances. Everybody has a differing concept of morality depending on their environment. Secondly, morality is not based on validity, and it isn’t consistent; no moral answer has a proof. As such, we cannot rely on instinct in a moral dilemma.

This argument is explored in a hypothesis called the Trolley Dilemma, which is further discussed in this variation
…show more content…
But can we really have a developed idea in such a small time? Certainly our intuition is usually reliable, but when faced with such a complex issue, we must think deeper. The fact is, we need to think about our moral values before we act. If we act rashly, we are not influenced by morality. Instead, our emotion, intuition and current circumstances take over. Studies have proved this; people who have just watched a comedy show are more likely to push the man off, as opposed to a documentary. Somebody who has just found a pound is more likely to give it to a stranger. Instincts are certainly not reliable when it comes to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    “We honor our past because it shapes our future,” this is one of the many quotes that Otterbein University holds dearly. Otterbein University holds this value greatly. Otterbein gives equality to all students, faculty, and others since 1847. Before any women’s rights and the abolishment of slavery, Otterbein University allowed people of color and women to receive a fair and equal education. Otterbein University is a mid-sized college located in Westerville, Ohio.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People travel great distances, sometimes forgetting about those they had known for so long. In his excerpt, Patetic argues that today’s transportation leads to poor relationships between family and friends. Patetic supports his argument by first stating that many family members no longer live within a close proximity to each other. He continues by explaining that people lose contact with each other when one moves away. Patetic’s argument is that people should remain within a decent proximity to each other in order to have a sense of community.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Helots Instinct

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ever since life first roamed the Earth, any living beings with a working mind had made decisions. Choices, if you will, that are made for one’s own benefit. The fact of the matter is that it is purely instinct to place oneself before others. Instinct is the driving force; the core motivation to a being’s actions. Through a plethora of circumstances, instinct can be perceived as either good or evil; it has easily shaped itself into words as powerful as greed or intelligence.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Next, during the decision making process we must think for ourselves, therefore, we may not be able to appeal to popular beliefs or adhere to social norms. Finally, our decisions should not be morally wrong, regardless of outside influences or potential consequences. In summary, this process requires the identification of facts, application of ideas, and development of conclusions. 2. In answering moral questions, do we need factual knowledge?…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A decision isn’t always between right and wrong. No, most of the time the decision is between one’s beliefs and what they wants to do, and what they THINK those around believe in and what they THINK they want to be done. The ability to act upon one’s beliefs, without feeling pressured or guilted by other’s beliefs, should be something everybody that walks this earth has the ability to do. A person’s thoughts are the gateway to making…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality involves the distinction between good and bad behavior. The conflicts arise when trying to determine why people should be moral. Most people rely their moral beliefs solely on religion while others believe morality is based on the happiness of themselves or others. Other people rely on their own basic instinct and conscience to decide what is moral or immoral. Another problem is deciding why one should be moral.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrift in a Moral Sea Life often throws people some difficult challenges where there ends up being more than one right course of action. Everyone has their own different morals that they have acquired through out their life and this helps them decide which ethical perspective that they believe in. One instance, of where you can look at multiple ethical perspectives to solve a problem comes from the essay “Lifeboat Ethics” by Garrett Harden, which is about being shipwrecked in the middle of the ocean and having to choose who you want to let on the boat. There are 50 people who are on the boat and there is room for only 10 more people, while there are 100 people who are stranded in the water outside of the boat. There are various theories…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Analysis

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Competition has its pluses and minuses. Both sides have very strong arguments, but I believe that there are more positive agendas that come from competition. Competition teaches people leadership qualities; something that many employers desire. It teaches people determination, something necessary to beat the person across for them, and how to be successful.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument between creation and evolution has been mostly taken from a very technical scientific point of view. Not usually form a moral, philosophical stand point. Science states what can be observed and seen. It cannot tell how the earth was formed or why it was formed. In order to make these arguments make sense, one needs to understand the effect of morality in each of the two arguments.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his 2005 paper “Ethics and Intuitions,” Peter Singer seeks to find a new role for intuitions in moral theorizing in light of studies by Jonathan Haidt and Joshua Greene, which seem to cast doubt on the reliability of moral intuitions. These studies suggest that much of our moral reasoning is less based in rationalizing and more based in instinctual “gut” reactions, and that these instincts can be explained in terms of their evolutionary history. Further, Greene in particular demonstrates that these moral instincts can be manipulated in order to give contradicting reports, suggesting that moral intuitions are unreliable. Singer, noting how moral theorists have thus far been unable to give an account of morality without relying on moral intuitions,…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 1: Where do our morals come from? Morals are not as instinctive as heartbeats. A sense of right or wrong is teachable, but not as permanent as bones and blood. People are not born with morals instilled in them.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Humans have the power to decide if an action is wrong or right. What differentiates people are their morals and ethics. It makes a big difference when we, as humans choose what is right in our eyes and proceed to act. Morals are what shapes us as individuals and what makes us unique in a certain way. The moral principle to any situation would be to do the right thing above all.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gore and Sadler-Smith (2011) proceed to show the effects of dual-processing on intuition, and offer the theory that intuitive thinking is a much more conceptual and expansive process. The primary basis of this research was to show that while intuition plays a role in decision-making, it does not act alone. The findings show that the nature of intuition is strongly guided by individual façades of moral judgment (ingenuously, how we unconsciously act in order to produce embedded moral standards). Research argues that intuitive thinking relies heavily on emotional processing, as well as the biological anatomy of moral judgment (Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2011). The idea that self-efficacy and the belief in one’s own actions effects the ability and accuracy of individual intuitions – people with low-levels of self-efficacy are less likely to produce large amounts of intuitive thinking, and will more often choose careful analysis (Gore & Sadler-Smith, 2011).…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics