Adrift In A Moral Sea Analysis

Improved Essays
Adrift in a Moral Sea Life often throws people some difficult challenges where there ends up being more than one right course of action. Everyone has their own different morals that they have acquired through out their life and this helps them decide which ethical perspective that they believe in. One instance, of where you can look at multiple ethical perspectives to solve a problem comes from the essay “Lifeboat Ethics” by Garrett Harden, which is about being shipwrecked in the middle of the ocean and having to choose who you want to let on the boat. There are 50 people who are on the boat and there is room for only 10 more people, while there are 100 people who are stranded in the water outside of the boat. There are various theories …show more content…
Relativism can be subjective, which is the view that an action is morally right if one approves of it or it can be cultural, the view that an action is right if one’s culture approves of it. As long as a person has approval for an action it will be considered the right action for them to make. Not every relativist is going to have morally correct beliefs because what seems right to one person may seem wrong to another. For example, some cultures believe that there is nothing wrong with committing crimes such as murder, rape, stealing because this is what is accepted and seen as normal in their culture. When looking at criterion 1 of moral criteria of adequacy, this theory appears to be inconsistent with considered judgments because what one person approves of can be seen as immorally incorrect. If you look at criterion 2, this theory is inconsistent because with relativism you are looking at your own beliefs and sometimes you can be wrong with the decisions that you make. Lastly this theory is useful with moral problem solving because you can look at your own culture and beliefs to end up making a decision. With that being said, when trying to decide what to do with the lifeboat situation, there can be a variety of actions that can be taken. For instance, one person may believe that men are superior to …show more content…
There definitely needs to be a lot thought put in to deciding on what to do with the lifeboat ethics situation because you have choose who is going to end up living in the end. This clearly isn’t an event that happens in everyday life, but by examining this what to do in this situation could help you learn something and you could apply this to a situation that you may face in the future. In the end, there is no true right approach in this situation because there is so many options that you can choose

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethical Decisions “In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing. The worst thing you can do is nothing” (Theodore Roosevelt). From the day we were born, we have been faced with making decisions. We are all humans, we cannot always make the right decision in a given moment. Sometimes, one says or does the wrong thing so it will not affect one mentally, physically and/or emotionally.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    I believe that it is common sense to disagree with moral relativism solely on the fact that it accepts racism, genocide of groups, even murder, as justifiable as long as that is what the group values to be right or acceptable. Having the beliefs of a moral relativist, you could go so far as to say that a group or culture could decide that starting a nuclear war was morally just, and that we as people outside of that group could not criticize those people for their actions. If ethical relativism is to be completely true, there can be no common ground for resolving moral disputes or for reaching an agreement on moral matters between members of different cultures. When it comes to justifying moral relativism, there is no decision procedure that can demonstrate the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments. On the contrary, moral objectivism, also known as moral absolutism, encompasses ethical theories that support the objectivity of moral values and norms.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Personal Statement – FA16 BA 342 Introduction Personal Ethics are the rules that one considers subconsciously when making a decision. Regardless of the choice made, ones ethical views are shown in each decision. In general, I believe everyone chooses the decision that they believe is ethically correct, however in certain situations, people may choose the decision that does not align with their ethics even if they are aware that it is not. An example of such is when I was 8 years old and my third grade class was hosting a pizza party. During the pizza party everyone was allowed one slice, but I had not eaten breakfast that day…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In society, individuals experience situations in which they tend to question whether their choices are ethical. In the article, “Thinking Ethically” by Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer, they discuss multiple approaches which can help a person determine whether they are a good or bad choice. Three approaches for making an ethical decision are “Utilitarian Approach”, “Fairness Approach”, and “Virtue Approach”. If a person is stuck in a situation where they’re indecisive about the choice, then the individual should look at the three approaches. This article relates to the story, Everyone Lives in a Flood Zone, because of the main character, Jack finds himself in situations that he has to make life and…

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This ethical point of view was built around the idea that what was best for the greatest number of people must be the right thing to do. So let's say that there were these five people were in a doctor's office, and they each needed a different organ transplant. Then a stranger comes in and he is a perfect match for everyone, would you: A. leave the…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism is based in the concept that there is not an absolute truth and that is all matter to the differences in perception and belief that provides a relative truth. Meaning that morality is relative to the norms…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I chose that I am a relativist because I believe that everyone’s moral principle is relative to the person who holds it. Everyone has their own opinion on what is permissible and what is not permissible. Everyone’s moral code can be different than society, for prime example, some people believe that everyone should be treated equally, and some do not. We as individuals cannot say that everyone’s moral value or cultural practice is objectively right or wrong. I am exactly like this, everyone has their own opinion, practices and beliefs, we cannot use our standards to judge another’s morality it is just ethically wrong.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kathleen, I agree that ethical relativism is not true because although we can accept differences in moral, cultural norms, practices, and beliefs, there is still a stronghold in my mind that morality can hold some of these beliefs and practices morally wrong. From my research and reading ethical relativism is a theory that is relative to the norms of one’s culture and fluctuates right from wrong on an individual and group level. This is the deciding factor between cultures actions and whether it is held right or wrong depending on the moral norms of the society. For example, in some countries beheading someone for certain crimes is acceptable when beheading in other countries is not acceptable and considered murder no matter the cause or reasoning. Just as in history specifically when regarding how the Jews were treated inside Nazi concentration camps was justified in the eyes of the Nazi society and would view their actions as ethical when this would be truly an ethical…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over three billion people in the world today live on less than two dollars and fifty cents. With such a large portion of the world living in abject poverty, questions have been raised about the duty of those who are more well off to those in need. The most compelling and sensible of the pieces responding to this issue would be the one from Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics due to its realistic approach to the ethics involved in the distribution of resources. Garrett Hardin’s Lifeboat Ethics provides the best response to the question on what is an individual's responsibility to the community due to its realistic approach to the ethics involved in the distribution of resources. For example, Harding explains why only a few select group of people…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays