Dail 2: An Individual's Beliefs

Great Essays
It is reasonable to act against one’s principles if the general consensus requires a person to do so. Is that so? Is it really reasonable to throw one’s morals out the window to fulfill the majority’s needs? Is it necessary to deem one’s beliefs secondary to the beliefs of those around? Because it shouldn’t be. A decision isn’t always between right and wrong. No, most of the time the decision is between one’s beliefs and what they wants to do, and what they THINK those around believe in and what they THINK they want to be done. The ability to act upon one’s beliefs, without feeling pressured or guilted by other’s beliefs, should be something everybody that walks this earth has the ability to do.
A person’s thoughts are the gateway to making
…show more content…
The poor man was stuck between what his occupation and upbringing wanted him to think and act on, and what his morals told him to believe and act on. A partially independent mind is one step, but without taking the next step, nothing has been achieved. 50% is not enough to be able to act independently. 100% effort and will is needed to be truly independent and acting on one’s beliefs. If 100% is given, a free mind will be present, allowing free …show more content…
Life is not about what could've been done; it's about what was done. If one chooses and acts upon their beliefs, they will have nothing to regret. If one allows their ideas and beliefs to be squandered, then they will have much to regret. Not choosing the decision they believed in may also lead to an unhappy life. If one did not act upon the opportunity of love, their life may not be as good as if they had jumped at the chance and step into the unknown. The unknown is daunting and difficult to throw oneself into, but being free can get one there, and give them the courage to try something new. Life isn’t about being safe. No, it’s about having the spirit and will for adventure and fun, and unless one stops playing it safe, they can never experience life. One must break free from pressure and prejudice to have free thoughts, beliefs, and actions, and truly experience

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Theodicy and Faith and Doubt at Ground Zero Every day certain circumstances cause people throughout the world to face undeniable questions about God and his abilities. Faith and Doubt at Ground Zero takes viewers through the stories and theodicies of multiple people affected by the horrendous tragedy of 9/11, questioning God’s role in the evil that took place on that sorrowful day and the impact it made on their futures. In the film Kirk Varnedoe, Tim Lynston, and Dasha Rittenberg provide their input and opinions about God and the good or bad power he has on this earth, relating to the works of Holy the Firm, and Holy Terrors. In Faith and Doubt at Ground Zero, Kirk Varnedoe, former Chief Curator at the Museum of Modern Art, offers insight…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nevertheless, no matter what philosophy you choose to follow, you must be able to understand and support your actions when confronted with an issue, such as…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divided By Faith Analysis

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is a complex, loaded question, but it is one that must be addressed if the church is to openly and honestly dialogue about the issues of race and about racial reconciliation. The two main contributing factors to the racialized nature of evangelicalism are slavery (and the aftermath thereof) and the disestablishment of religion. The first slave ship arrived on the shores of Jamestown, VA in 1619.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Circumstances When People Follow or Not Follow Their Conscience Different circumstances require different measures. That is, there are sometimes when people follow their conscience, and at other times, they don’t follow their conscience. In my opinion, people follow their conscience when they feel that the actions they take are righteous or when they have peace and feel confident about these actions that they take. On the contrary, I believe that most people don’t follow their conscience when they are pressured to do something that they rather not do. In addition, I also believe that different people also follow different actions, based on many of their different attributes, such as their race, the environment they live in, and their place of birth.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Foot Summary

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Foot’s paper , she takes a goddess of the choice viewpoint to her theory of moral action. Foot begins her paper by outlining how Kantians say that moral judgment cannot be a hypothetical imperative and only a categorical imperative. The reasoning behind this conclusion lies in the concept that “should and “ought” in moral contexts are different; a “should” can only be used in statements related to hypothetical imperative and “ought” only apply to statements related to categorical imperatives. However, Foot states that there are rules that use “should” as a hypothetical imperative, rule of etiquette.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: A Public Faith

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Volf, in the introduction his book, A Public Faith, asks some questions such as, should religion stay out of politics or should religion brings its vision of what it means to have a good life into politics? (x). My position is yes, religion should bring its vision of what it means to have a good life into politics, but not totalitarianism; instead pluralism in all societies. Actually, in the USA people are blessed to freely exercise their religion, but not impose it to others, according to the constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I believe that if a person got punished for doing what they think is right, they should accept the consequence. If a person knows that they will be punished but they heavily agree with what is right I believe that they should do it. Although they should determine whether if what is right is exceptional enough to stand up for. Then also evaluate whether the punishment is too great for them to handle. This goes hand in hand with believing in your conscience.…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Invidual Beliefs

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tiffany, I really enjoyed reading your discussion post. I especially liked the way that you incorporated the topic and influence of heredity on an invidual's attitudes and beliefs. One of the major arguments and/or debates within the psychological community is whether individuals are mostly influenced by nature or nurture. I happen to believe that there is a symbiotic relationship between the two influences; whereas the environment can either foster or suffocate those actions, behaviors, and beliefs that an individual is genetically predisposed; or the environment that an individual is nurtured in can impact or influence behaviors that an individual is not necessarily genetically disposed to exhibit. Even so, both factors largely impact one's…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromising Beliefs

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compromising beliefs can indeed be deleterious but it all depends on what the beliefs are. While some beliefs are built on a strong foundations of morals, some beliefs are desultory and will lead people astray. In the case of the former, it is compromising those beliefs that can be more salubrious than harmful. Hence the statement that compromising one's beliefs is more harmful than adhering to them is only true in some cases, in the end the statement most be viewed in various contexts. Some people may live by firm moral codes, this allows them to lead very peaceful lives and keep them out of trouble.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “People talk about the middle of the road as though it were unacceptable. Actually, all human problems, excepting morals, come into the gray areas. Things are not all black and white. There have to be compromises. The middle of the road is all of the usable surface.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individual’s Moral Obligation to stand for what is Right In “Civil Disobedience” by Thoreau asserts that government seldom shows itself sufficient and that it often derives its power from the majority; who are its subjects. Furthermore, Thoreau underscores that the state, just as corporates have no conscience, but through its citizens, can be viewed as conscientious or reckless. Consequently, it is up to the people to practice conscience when endeavoring into their activities.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This highlights the idea that a fundamental conception of human existence is freedom. This freedom, confronts man with a radical choice. Thus being, the choice to choose whichever action he commits to. No ethical theory can dictate the correct choice for man to make for himself. There is no right or wrong it is simply what you choose to do.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Morality Vs Morality

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are doubtless many people in the world that behave morally in some aspects of life and immorally in other scenarios. They choose when to be guided by their moral compass and when to ignore it. How can a person such as this ever become a just person in society? The person can start on the path of being just by not focusing as much on following a moral compass, which may be subjective, but instead on following objective concepts central to nearly all theories of morality. These would be the requirements of the use of reason and impartiality.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The three types of belief systems are extremely different when it comes to their principles, affirming religious beliefs and the amount of evidence needed to affirm said beliefs. Critical rationalism, fideism, and strong rationalism are the three positions and they all have been discussed by different philosophers and people throughout the years. They all have their own strengths and weaknesses and ways of rationally affirming their beliefs. Strong Rationalism believes that it is rational to affirm a belief system only when there is sufficient evidence to prove in favor of its truth.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays