Morality Vs Morality

Superior Essays
There are doubtless many people in the world that behave morally in some aspects of life and immorally in other scenarios. They choose when to be guided by their moral compass and when to ignore it. How can a person such as this ever become a just person in society? The person can start on the path of being just by not focusing as much on following a moral compass, which may be subjective, but instead on following objective concepts central to nearly all theories of morality. These would be the requirements of the use of reason and impartiality. Together, these two notions make up the minimum conception morality (Rachels 13). The person should also appeal to virtues in order to have the character necessary to be just. This path to being just …show more content…
Without reason, conclusions are made from feelings alone. Feelings can, most certainly, differ from person to person. They also can be clouded by prejudice, selfishness, cultural conditioning, as well as a multitude of other things (Rachels 10). Unfortunately, most people believe morality is derived from nothing more than what they feel (Matteson). This is often referred to as a moral compass. Most behave according to what their moral compass dictates, that is if they wish to be “moral”, and it is generally frowned upon to behave in a manner that goes against one’s moral compass. In addition, there is typically disapproval from someone or some group if an action goes against that particular individual’s or group’s compass, even if it is not against the compass of the person actually doing the action. Some might instinctively feel, for example, that euthanasia is wrong. Others might think their moral compasses say that it is right. Those opposed to it would claim that …show more content…
Just is defined as being based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair (“Definition of Just in English” ). In order for a person to be so then, they must be virtuous. There are many virtues that are crucial in order to be considered a virtuous person. These virtues are to be a mean between two extremes, and the mean is to be relative to ourselves (“Aristotle”). The particular virtues each person should have can also vary person to person depending on the life of the person. This allows Virtue Ethics to be a flexible and easily adaptable theory. In being just, fairness would clearly be a necessary virtue as it is even stated in the definition of just. Other of the virtues closely tied with morality such as benevolence, civility, honesty, tolerance, and many more would be required as well. Virtue Ethics alone cannot tell one exactly what action to do, which is typically considered what morality is by the standards of today, but instead how to be (Rachels 169). How to be, nevertheless, was thought by the philosopher Aristotle to be central to ethics (Rachels 157). One will behave accordingly to how they are so that is what makes it an vital aspect of morality, and by extension, being just. The person who turns their moral compass on and off should strive to be virtuous. The various virtues necessary should be determined and made habits of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    They acknowledge that there rules of thumbs, but sometimes absolute obedience to the rules don’t apply all the time. In addition, there can be conflict at times. Moral understanding and moral wisdom are needed to deal with particular situations. According to virtue ethics, this can only be gained through training, experience, and practice. This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Being the person one ought to be has a great deal to do with what the right thing is, or the moral thing to do. With some other theories one isn’t sure, or is left without a complete guide on what to do, and this can be frustrating. The structure that CEE uses is simply morality involves recognizing the intrinsic value of humanness, one’s own and that of others, along with actions, reactions, and interactions that reflect an appreciation of human value. Immorality involves a failure to recognize the intrinsic value of humanness, one’s own and that of others, along with a failure to act, react, and interact in ways that reflect an appreciation of human value. With this principle humans can use the rational, cognitive processes that we are capable of to determine and discover what is…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The point of them is to provide us with reasoning and the guidance to make our own decisions. There is no one true ethical way to live because that is for the individual to decide. Whether he or she decides to live by sacrificing his or her values for the greater good or by staying true to his or her value for decision making is up to him or her. This being said, the best theory is the theory that feels right for the person. Each person has a set of morals, motivation, and ethics that they value.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Determining what is right or wrong is not going to be the same for every person. Human beings have this fascinating ability to determine their path in life, what will yours be? There is also this idea of consequentialism. Which say many people argue that humans have a conscience (which sets us apart from brute animals) and that we naturally derive what is ethically right or wrong from what our conscience tells us. Is this aspect of Moral Subjectivism something particular that humans have?…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Subjectivity Of Morality

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The morality of every decision and action is objective. If morals are objective then as a society we may look back at certain actions and assess their morality. Just because an action or decision was agreed upon in the past or by certain parties as morally acceptable, it does not make those actions morally acceptable when we reflect up those times. That is why people and societies progress and reform in order to stray away from immoral actions. This contradicts the assessment made by J.L.…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A person's sense of morality is defined in terms of more abstract principles and values. Moral reasoning is based on individual rights and justice. People now believe that some laws are unjust and should be changed or eliminated. This level is marked by a growing realization that individuals are separate entities from society and that individuals may disobey rules inconsistent with their own principles. Post-conventional moralists live by their own ethical principle that typically include such basic human rights as life, liberty, and justice and view rules as useful but changeable rather than absolute dictates that must be obeyed without question.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics What has value? Doing the Right Thing Human beings commonly act out of self interest. Image is an important part of who we are. The right thing to do it categorical, not hypocritie What is "doing the right thing"? Is it the golden rule of treating others the way you would want to be treated?…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy. There is, however, a defining difference between morality and ethics. An individual that recognizes the difference between right and wrong and still chooses to do right is moral. Ethics are moral values in action, and this means that morality is apparent in those who do the right thing despite it being hard or dangerous. Utilitarians are of the mindset that one should do that which will produce the most happiness.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For me, morality and ethics are different but relevant to each other. Morality is the proper behaviour of a person in doing right or wrong things while ethics is the human standards to do good and bad actions. When we are doing morality and ethics we will feel happy because we are doing good things that people around us will not be hurt and it is for us to become happy in the future and to do these is our nature. For example, you want to be a successful person so in order to achieve the goal you want, you have to be patient and do good things simultaneously. According to Aristotle, “the purpose of ethics is to simply find the ultimate purpose of life of human person” It means that we act ethically to have the ultimate happiness and to know the purpose of our lives.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics