Letter From Birmingham Jail Summary

Improved Essays
Everyone is know who is King, Martin Luther Jr even if he is Chinese.The famous in china,was King helped to organize the 1963 March on Washington, where he delivered his famous "I Have a Dream" speech. There, he established his reputation as one of the greatest orators in American history. When I first read this article in China, I found that this is what a powerful guy, he is in the maintenance of justice. The Letter from Birmingham Jail is an open letter written on April 16, 1963, by Martin Luther King, Jr. The letter defends the strategy of nonviolent resistance to racism.It says that people have a moral responsibility to break unjust laws, and to take direct action rather than waiting potentially forever for justice to come through the courts. Although he was trapped in the prison, but he thought his idea was not to be tied, and he soon wrote a letter of focus is “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” . He thought it has two laws, a just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas: An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and …show more content…
The so-called fair, all people are made of and considered to be a fair thing to make quality, and because of this quality that people want to conduct fair and equitable thing to do. Aristotle believed that in a variety of virtues, the only justice is concerned with the good of others, for the sake of others to benefit, not a part of the virtue of justice, but the whole of virtue. Justice is a virtue, because it does not to force people to do things, but to maintain those people who need help to go to, so they no longer suffer oppression and bondage, let them be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Letter Read Around The World On April 16, 1963, while Martin Luther King Jr. was in jail for participating in a civil rights protest, he wrote a letter to eight clergymen to plead his case why the protests happening in Birmingham and all over the south were just. “Letter from Birmingham Jail” not only took the clergy by surprise, it took the whole nation by surprise. At the time of the letters publication, the nation was still divided by the Mason-Dixon line but for a different reason this time; the south was unfairly treating the African American citizens who lived there; stores wouldn't sell their goods to them, restaurants wouldn't serve them, African American people even had to use water fountains and bathrooms specifically marked…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unjust laws are created by humans and don’t have roots with natural laws (King, 3). They degrade the human personality and damage our souls. Unjust laws provides a false sense of superiority to some and inferiority to others. (21) King concludes that when an individual breaks an unjust law and accepts the punishment they are really showing the highest respect for law. Since unjust laws aim to dehumanize some they should not be seen as laws at all.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Rights activist, Martin Luther King Jr, in his letter, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” highlights his views as to why he believes demonstrations are needed towards justice for Blacks. King’s purpose is to refute and provide counterarguments regarding the urgency of changing segregation laws. He accomplishes this by arguing against the clergymen’s claims that opposed his views on why the Civil Rights Movement is needed and why he is calling for demonstrations involving direct action in Birmingham to continue. He adopts a civil and persistent tone in his letter to show how Blacks will stop at nothing to gain their basic freedoms and rights. In paragraphs thirteen and fourteen, King emphasizes the need for change in Birmingham by using diction, anaphora, and anecdotes to support his claims on the fight for justice.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law,” “An unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself,” “By the same token, a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow and that it is willing to follow itself,” “A law is unjust if it is inflicted on a minority that, as a result of being denied the right to vote, had no part in enacting or devising the law.” King also included the rationales of just and unjust laws put forth by historical philosophers. “An unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law,” “Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.” By including relative quoted material from…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A just law is a man-made code that squares with the ethical law. An unjust law is a code that is out of order with the ethical law. “Thus it is that I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court, for it is morally right; and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances, for they are morally…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jonathan Edwards, one of the most influential leaders for the puritan religion, delivered a speech on July 8th, 1741 titled “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” which informed his audience that God is the only thing holding them up over the pits of Hell. While on the other hand, Martin Luther King Jr, an American civil rights activist and author, writes a letter, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” while held prisoner in Birmingham City Jail addressing eight Clergyman who condemned his protests throughout the city. Both Edwards and King use different variations of rhetorical devices to convey their messages to each of their audiences. Edwards uses negative imagery and metaphors to convince his audience that God is the only thing holding them up over the pits of Hell, and King uses metaphors and allusions to convey his message that the clergymen need to get on board with the civil rights movements or they will be…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dearest Mr. Abner Snopes and Mrs. Nancy, I write you to ask for a favor. As you may know, Homer Barron and I have been together for quite some time now, but I think he is planning on leaving me. You see, I need your assistance to help me kill Homer. I have come to you both about this because we are alike in more ways than it might seem.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. was an African American that lived and fought through racial oppression. He was one of the most well known leaders of nonviolent protests. Being a minority trying to persuade the privilege that it’s time for change is a tough job. In King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” has many components that are crucial to catching the audience attention and proving a point. In this letter Martin Luther King Jr. was responding back to rude comments that clergymen made about him and the protesting.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Birmingham City Jail

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Letter from Birmingham City Jail was written by Martin Luther King Jr. while he was sitting in his prison cell. Martin Luther King Jr. explains how he is disappointed in some people but proud of others for what they have done to stand up against the government. He exposes to people some examples of cruelty that the police and government are inflicting on innocent people for no reason and what others are doing to stop it. Letter from Birmingham City Jail is effective in the way that it appeals to our emotions and provides us with the reality of what happened. Letter from Birmingham City Jail provides the audience with many examples of cruelty that were happening in the area around them.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon uses Ring of Gyges as an example to demonstrate that when people can get away from the consequences of being unjust, they will probably choose to become unjust for receiving benefits while having a good reputation of being justice (Plato, Republic book 2, p53). Both Socrates and Glaucon agrees that justice is something “good”, which is good in itself, or it can bring good as a consequence or both. But what if justice itself is not good and will not bring anything good alone with them? Ring of Gyges is an extended expression of Thrasymachus’s famous claim: “Justice is simply the advantage of the stronger” (Plato, Republic book 1, p39).…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In book #5 Aristotle begins by clarifying that “just” is an inherent quality of a person’s mind and character. A person’s actions and wishes all must reflect the qualities of a person who is just for them to possess the virtue of justice. However, Aristotle states that a person’s temperament can only be understood by looking at its opposites. By this he means in order for a true understanding of whether or not a person is just you must look at an unjust person’s qualities along with a person who possess just qualities whenever you are discussing a person who has justice as a virtue. Aristotle further emphasizes his argument by stating that an unjust man is considered to be not only someone that breaks laws but also someone that is greedy and unfair.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By equating justice with lawfulness Aristotle does not take into account the possibility of a law being unjust. It is not hard to come to the conclusion that some laws can be inherently unjust and through following them an evil is committed upon another. This contradiction is evident in Aristotle’s logic when he says, “evidently all lawful acts are in a sense just acts; for the acts laid down by the legislative art are lawful, and each of these, we say, is just” (6). He does not take into account the possibility of a person who, while being unlawful, remains just. If moral virtue is attained through habit and one’s morality tells you no to follow a certain law, have you committed a vice?…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail is one of the most widely recognized symbols of the Civil Rights Movement, along with his “I Have A Dream” speech and the Freedom Riders. In the letter, King described the hardships faced by African Americans and why he is leading a nonviolent protest against segregation. The Letter is an example of direct action, and is important to study in order to understand methods leaders can use to influence change at any level. My initial reaction to reading Letter from Birmingham Jail was eye opening. The first time I read the Letter was last June during my activist certification, and it was an excellent example of the power of direct action and grassroots activism.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is a letter written by Martin Luther King Jr. dated 16 April 1963. After being arrested for protesting in Birmingham, Alabama, eight white clergymen condemned Dr. King and wrote an article disagreeing with his actions in the local newspaper. Dr. King, in return, wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail” addressing the clergymen and their concerns. “The Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions” is a speech written and delivered by Abraham Lincoln on 27 January 1838. This speech was prompted by the murder of abolitionist newspaper editor, Elijah Lovejoy, and was delivered to the Young Men’s Lyceum in Springfield, Illinois.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato vs Aristotle: Justice Plato and Aristotle are two of the most remembered philosophers of all time. Being master and student, the two have had interesting propinquity yet gradually they came to disagreements amongst their viewpoints. Plato concluded that the highest reality was the forms, or ideas, while Aristotle refuted such concepts, claiming the physical world to be the most real. Rooted in different philosophical origins, the two began to build vast networks of ideals, often having completely different conclusions as to how to accomplish day to day activities in practicality. One of the most important quarrels was the two’s views on justice and its essence.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays