- In New England, things were going to be different for the people. The government had plans, "...to enact, constitute, and frame such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices.." (Document 3A2) They wanted equality amongst the colonists; unlike Plymouth, people wanted New England to be different because in Plymouth, there were many difficulties that many people suffered through, such as mistreatment and unequal justice for …show more content…
However, in Document 3C1, "...the valid laws... reproduced with biblical chapter and verse..." Some of the laws followed by the colonists were based on religion because religion was valued greatly in New England, but the punishment of breaking the laws were severe and cruel.
- There were a specific set of laws that, "...statutes governing personal behavior.." (Document 3C1) These laws were called the Blue laws; their purpose was to restrict malicious and unacceptable actions of the colonists. However, the Blue laws were not enforced well enough because they soon became pointless and futile to the colonists. According to Document 3C1, "Connecticut's blue laws received unpleasant notoriety..." Reverend Samuel Peter's history of Connecticut showed that the Blue laws did not garner many positive comments; instead, the set of laws received a lot of backlash and negative feedback from the people.
- The laws were strict for the colonists; it was easy to be put to death if they made a wrong move. For example, if they committed murder or manslaughter, they would be sentenced to death. As well, deceit, theft, and disobedience were looked down upon within the colony; in other words, "...he shall be put to death." (Document