How Did The Patriot Help The Revolutionary War

Improved Essays
The patriots have been making trouble for the Loyalist. They only want to preserve their lands when the colonies stand up to Britain. They will only brew more trouble for the Loyalist. The Patriots have been making trouble with the British by turning down the acts and boycotting the products of the British to prove that they won 't buy anything until they are heard and respected. The British would only help the colonies if they would buy taxed goods so they have money to protect them. While many people sided with the patriots siding with the British were the most reasonable idea for loyalist. All the while the year of 1764 April 5, the British put a tax on everything that was being imported to get them out of debt, because protected the …show more content…
In payment the colonies should repay the British should products and not boycott the British products. The colonies should be proud to be protected by the British army they are the strongest army. The colonies thought that since the British were the strongest army that they would not care to protect the puny colonies. They thought that they would push the colonies to their breaking point. The patriots wanted to see how far they would go until they would take action. In 1765 March, 22 the Stamp act was passed due to the fact that the colonies were trying to smuggle goods into their homes. The stamp act stated that the colonist had to buy stamps for all legal documents, newspapers, and pamphlets. The colonies were even more with the British parliament. The colonies would end up continuing boycotting the products until they would repeal the stamp …show more content…
Then king George III did not want anything to do with the patriots. The colonies were furious when the king called them out in open rebellion. The king thought that if he would side with the colonist he would not be liked on the Britain. The king worried about him would be peaceful with the colonist they would use that to their advantage. The king worried that if the colonist used their bond to their leverage the king would not hear the end of it from the British colonist. The colonies were dumbfounded that the king would not side with the colonist. The colonist thought that the king had pushed them too far. The king also thought that the colonist pushed him too far. The colonist thought that it was too far the colonist wanted to split from

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    He does not believe that the collection of taxes is necessary because it was not specifically stated in the Constitution. Jefferson’s point of view is that he thinks that the Federalists are making claims that are not in the Constitution and he thinks their power is useless. “…Cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government…” (Document C). In George Washington’s Farewell Address, he claimed that the government should try its best to not develop political parties. He warned that overtime it would hurt the government because they would not be able to make decisions.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neo-Whigs claim that the British government should have let the colonists have a say in their own government and the British refusal to let them is sufficient to spark a rebellion. The British were so far from America that much of the European influence did not live long in the colonies. British officials sent to govern the Americans did not have the correct mindset with which to govern a self-reliant people. British officials were used to the people of conquered territories coming to the British governor for everything from protection to lawsuits. Americans wanted to solve their own problems.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The colonists were not pleased with how they were being neglected by their mother country. The king took away the colonist right to be self-governed. The colonists were also being unfairly treated compared to the people that are living in Britain. Thomas Jefferson wrote a document with over fifteen reasons that the colonist were neglected by the king. One of the fifteen statements he talked about was, “He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.” (Declaration of Independence).…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stamp Act Analysis

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Stamp Act started the “No taxation without representation!” ideology taken by the colonists. They decided that it was time to take action against Britain rather just moaning to their neighbors about how corrupt Britain is, so the Stamp Act Congress was established in 1765. The Congress had hopes of getting the act repealed and worked on organizing “Non-Importation” Agreements. These were boycotts by the colonies in response to the Stamp Act. This paved the way for colonists to blatantly defy British rule.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Quartering Act of 1765 was a policy that required colonists to offer their houses to British troops, they were also vital to feed them. The colonists responded to this by protesting in legislatures. This eventually led to the Boston Massacre of 1770. The Stamp act of 1765 was a British requirement stating that all legal or official documents used in the colonies had to be written on certified British paper. This would again, pay off the debt from the war.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The violence and taxes was too much for them, and it was time where they said enough is enough. From the Common Sense pamphlet, the colonists figured out why independence was necessary, and that the King did not care for the welfare of the Americans. Paine 's pamphlet caused the colonists to unite and stand up for each other as a nation. They wanted to be self governed and wanted their own democracy. After all, if the King read the Olive branch petition, maybe the Loyalist still would have stayed loyal to him, making the Common Sense pamphlet useless, but since it did not happen, America was now in a revolution for…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Like, he didn’t let Bacon trade fur with the Native Americans. That helped motivate people to revolt against Berkeley. Berkeley also didn’t care very much for the colonist’s safety, which aided then to revolt. When the colonists did the rebellion, the colonists ran Berkeley out of town, and torched the capital. At first the rebellion was being delayed because there were armed merchant ships from England, and he captain of the ship were on Berkeley’s side.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French-Indian War DBQ

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Following this was a statement that “ proper regulation of trade”, was necessary. The British used the Navigation Acts to stricten the control over the trade with the colonies, and prevent their rivals from competing with them. This act said that goods to and from England had to be on english ships that they built with english men on them. The colonists didn 't like this act and tried to prevent it from being renewed, but Britain wouldn 't budge. At this point, England had stockpiled an enormous amount of debt, and they really had no way of paying it off themselves, so they began taking steps to making the colonies pay their debts off, through imposing taxes on frequently used necessities, and regulating their trade.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They had more at stake, losing meant years of harsher treatment under British rule as repercussion. However, British soldiers did not have a strong reason to fight, since losing the campaign posed no threat to their homeland. Defeat only meant international humiliation for England. With motivation on their side, the Patriots were willing to do anything in order to secure their freedom and…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Maier, when discussing earlier greivances over the White Pines Act, investigated why the colonists opposed this form of government intervention so much. The White Pines Act, although only a legislature that was meant to reserve all white pine trees for the Crown, still bothered colonists because it stepped into their economic and social world and allowed Parliament to make decisions. “The community’s immediate welfare was at stake, not the satisfaction of any anti-British prejudices,” was how Maier described colonial thought. Nothing in the opposition of specific interventions said that the colonists disliked Parliament or negated their power. Colonists just disagreed with where and how Parliament could impose its powers, (Greene, 28–29; Maier,…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays