Antony And Brutus In Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
Power is a thing that most humans strive for. However, is killing a friend for power going too far? Brutus and the conspirators did not think that assassination was far enough. Julius Caesar and Brutus were the two people in the book that took power. Julius Caesar obtained power by listening to no one but himself and becoming a dictator. Brutus came to power by listening to the other conspirators, especially Cassius, and is influenced to kill Caesar. Brutus is then depicted as an ideal leader by the other conspirators. However as the book progresses, Brutus starts to feel guilty about the assassination of Caesar and takes his own life. By the end of the book Julius Caesar and a majority of the conspirators are dead. Throughout Julius Caesar the ongoing theme of idealism is represented though the three appeals; logos, ethos, and pathos. Pathos was one of the literary devices that delineates the theme of idealism. Pathos can be seen during the speech …show more content…
Anthony says "I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and sure he is an honorable man." In this part of Antony’s speech, Antony is building up Caesar and showing how Antony is always going to be loyal to his friend and how honorable and great his friend Caesar was. Throughout the speech given by Antony, Antony presents many acts of generosity from Caesar to the people, such as giving 75 drachmas in his will to the people of Rome. The pathos in this speech uses the emotion from Antony to show that the ideal for citizens was to be loyal to the leader no matter what, as the leader decides the fate of the country, and this speech also shows the ideal leader as being an honorable, generous, and ambitious man. This is an ideal for the leader because, without being ambitious the empire will never expand or gain power and without the leader being honorable the empire would fall into

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Act 4 Scene 2 of Julius Caesar, Brutus greets Titinius and Pindarus, who tell him that Cassius has almost arrived at the camp site. Brutus is eager to confront Cassius because he says that he offended him and looks forward to hearing his explanation. As soon as Cassius shows up with most of his army he immediately says that Brutus had wronged him and also wants an explanation. They decide to take the dilemma inside the tent so the armies won’t see their argument. This scene shows that even though Brutus and Cassius were best friends they still had issues.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first sentence of the paragraph is describing the nature of the surrounding countryside of a plain in central France, using fancy terminology and descriptive language such as “buttressed by purplish mountains on the east, the rolling hill country of central France is both beautiful and strategic.” The author seems to be trying to set up something bigger, and I feel like something of a greater nature is going to come up. Judging by the way that it is worded and the implication of the word “strategic”, it seems that something of which requires tactics on this beautiful flatland is about to be made. Judging by the subtitle, which reads: “Caesar conquered Gaul, but awaiting him was the treacherous Brutus.” , it sounds like these two people -…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Effects of Brutus and Antony Brutus Is a noble man Antony repeats with sarcasm during the time that Brutus allowed him for Caesar’s funeral. Brutus was a noble man indeed, though he was corrupted by the conspirators to betray Caesar. Antony can relate with Cassius for being manipulative and weasel like. The contrast between both Brutus and Antony are very distinct and can show how easily someone can be manipulated or how a person can hide their true self.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2.75-109) Antony really tries to remind the people of how good Caesar was to them and being the last speaker he has the most impact therefore the people push aside all that brutus has said. “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept”(3.2.75-109) Antony really wins over the people by apealing to their hearts remidning…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus once said, "As he was valiant, I honour him ; but, as he was ambitious, I slew him" (3.2.24-26). Brutus a high ranking nobleman joins a conspiracy that later kills Caesar. His sense of honor motivates him through to the end ,but also it is his weakness. He thinks his fellow society is high minded like him. This makes it easy to manipulate Brutus throughout the play.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To explain, Antony finally returned to the topic of the will. The only reason he got off the topic was so that he had time to talk about the conspirators in a negative way. This quote shows how in the next couple lines, Antony will read Caesar’s will to the crowd, saying that they have gained seventy five drachmas and Caesar’s private arbors. The persuasive technique of Pathos was used here as well because this shows that Caesar considered the people of Rome family, which made them very emotional and excited because being family with Caesar meant so much to them. By showing the common people of Rome Caesar’s will, Antony created a whirlwind of emotions throughout the…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bill janklow once said, There’s a world out there, and you’ve got to look at both sides of the mountain in your lifetime. The relevance of the quote to brutus is that he has to choose from either the dark or the right. The way brutus should have chosen was the wrong way he should have chosen what he did.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout Antony’s speech, he used ethos to provide evidence that Caesar did not deserve to be murdered. Antony refers back to when Caesar denied the crown, and says an ambitious man would have jumped at the opportunity (III, ii, 97-100). Antony also uses logos to support his credibility, saying that he knew Caesar and he was a good man who did not earn his tragic fate. Antony also calls the audience “friends” in his opening line of his speech. He does this to make the crowd feel that Antony is one of them, and that he is trustworthy.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene ii, the author portrays a persuasive monologue given to the commoners by Caesar’s friend, Antony, in order to show his viewpoint on the death of Caesar. Throughout Antony’s speech, he attempts to stir up the emotion of the commoners and subtly tries to start a war within the community in order to get revenge for Caesar’s death. In the beginning of the speech, Antony’s tone is sarcastic, but genuine. In his speech, he states, repeatedly, “But Brutus says he was ambitious/…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus and Caesar have always been good friends, until Brutus was put in a position to choose either his relationship with Caesar or keeping the better of Rome away from Caesar's powerful rule. Brutus, Cassius, and others believe that Caesar’s power is becoming out of hand and that he will eventually become a dictator. Since he is seen as unstoppable, Brutus decides that the only way to save all of Rome from his rule is to assassinate him. When Brutus declares, “We all stand up against the spirit of Caesar / And in the spirit of men there is no blood” (II.i.180-181), he takes a large leadership role when he implies…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By this, Brutus means that once Caesar attained too much power and recognition, he forgot about those less fortunate than him and began to view himself as a god rather than a servant to his people. Because of this, despite his reservations, Brutus comes to the conclusion that Caesar’s coronation would be disastrous to Rome and that he must be stopped. Since Caesar 's rise to power seemed inevitable at that point, the only way to avoid it was through his death. This motive shows that the conspirators sought to sacrifice Caesar in the name of Rome’s well-being, rather than brutally butcher him in an act of…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony showed remorse and a bit of happiness saying his speech at Caesar’s funeral. Happiness came from him describing his Captain (Caesar) as a person. Reciting memories and good times they shared. Although, he didn’t praise Caesar is his speech as he reminded the crowd in his speech “I came to bury Caesar, not praise him.” Antony still shows he loves Caesar by saying “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.”…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays