Theme Of Hyperbole In Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Act III, Scene ii, the author portrays a persuasive monologue given to the commoners by Caesar’s friend, Antony, in order to show his viewpoint on the death of Caesar. Throughout Antony’s speech, he attempts to stir up the emotion of the commoners and subtly tries to start a war within the community in order to get revenge for Caesar’s death. In the beginning of the speech, Antony’s tone is sarcastic, but genuine. In his speech, he states, repeatedly, “But Brutus says he was ambitious/And Brutus is an honorable man.” Within this, Antony shows the crowd his opinion of Brutus – he believes Brutus is an honest and trustworthy man; however, he states the not-so “ambitious” actions of Caesar …show more content…
One of the rhetorical devices he uses is hyperbole. Hyperbole is an exaggeration to make a dramatic effect. In Antony speech, he announces, “My heart is in the coffin here with Caesar.” When Antony uses this device, he exaggerates his doleful emotions. This creates the crowd to become more connected with Antony due to the fact that he is also mourning for the loss of Caesar. Due to his, the commoners are more anticipated to hear what Antony has to say in his speech. Another rhetorical device that Antony uses is paralipsis. This is giving emphasis by stating little or nothing about a particular subject. Antony does this when he reveals, “I found it in his closet; ‘tis his will./Let but the commons hear this testament,/Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read.” In doing so, Antony hides his intention of sharing the will by exposing the Plebeians to the seal of Caesar. The Plebeians are anxious to know more of what was left from Caesar; they are unknowingly being persuaded to want more information. This eventually led to the unraveling of the apparent good side of Caesar that would make the commoners vengeful of his death. Antony had achieved his goal in persuading the ignorant commoners to think that the conspirators are savage

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony begins his speech by addresses his audience. He refers to them as, “Friends,Roman,Countrymen”( 3.2.131), this articulates that he is bringing himself down to the plebeians level so he can make the crowd feel as though he is their friend even though they are separated by status and rank. This line is an example of pathos because the line is based mostly on emotion or the sympathy and emotion in the audience. This is important to know because as his speech progresses he uses a lot of rhetoric, such as pathos and ethos. Going on he says “ I come to bury Caesar not to praise him” (3.2.121), Antony uses rhetoric and genuine reminders to ultimately portray Caesar in such a positive light so that the crowd enrages at the conspirators.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus’ speech creates an understanding from the plebeians of the moral obligation of Caesar’s death. After hearing Antony’s speech the romans experiences a lot of anger and decide to burn down the houses of all the conspirators and kill them. “We will be revenged” (III.3.198). The anger inside of the plebeians proves to create irrational thoughts which results in them killing an innocent man who just happens to have the same name as one of the conspirators. In addition to that they also go to destroy the conspirators’ houses.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While justifying his reasons for the speech, that he “[isn’t speaking] to disprove what Brutus spoke” but rather “speaks what he knows,” Antony uses verbal irony. The statement contains irony because he says that he speaks not to disprove Brutus, however he did the opposite by the claims against the Conspirators. Using the irony as bait to draw in the citizens, Antony builds on his tone of manipulation. The irony makes him appear as a good guy, that does not speak out against others, so the people respect him differently. He manipulates them into listening to the rest of the words he must say.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first place, Antony states, “You will compel me, than, to read the will” (3.2)? Similarly, Antony wanted to trick the crowd into keeping him longer. In other words, Antony planned to mention to the crowd that he had Caesar’s will, but would then subtly put it away. Once Antony had changed the subject, he would use the persuasive technique of Pathos and change their emotions to cause the crowd to feel eager about hearing what Caesar had left them all in his will. Another key point was when Antony said, “Alas, you know not: I must tell you then: You have forgot the will I told you of” (3.2).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By using flattery, Antony is able to bring the Plebeians to his side through his speeches at Caesar’s funeral. First, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious… And Brutus is an honourable man” (III,ii,77-87). Antony constantly gives credit to the conspirators, especially Brutus. He repeatedly shows that the other speakers at Caesar’s funeral were honorable too.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony makes the people remember all that Caesar has done for them, and slowly manipulates them with his words. “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men”(III,ii,139). Again Antony uses parallel structure to sway the crowd. He tells them that he can’t read the will because they are men and would become enraged, then tells them that they are his heirs. Antony understands that in order to go up against the conspirators, he needs the people and can only get them, by manipulating their emotions to discredit Brutus.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays