Animal Experimentation: Morally Right Or Wrong?

1195 Words 5 Pages
The controversy on whether animal experimentation is morally right has grown greatly since the 1980’s. For cosmetic and scientific purposes, animals have been used as variables to hypothesize how a certain product or drug would react on or in a human’s body. Cosmetically, animals are bred and used to test skin and eyewear products. Scientifically, animals are used to understand medical drugs, diseases or viruses. While this may seem productive, animal experimentation is flawed and unnecessary. Animal testing cosmetology industry morally and logically deny several aspects. Many makeup industries like Cover Girl, Maybelline, and Almay wastefully use disadvantaged animals to conduct liability for their products. Not only do the majority of makeup …show more content…
May (2011) Volume 85. 367-485. SpringerLink. Web. 20 July 2015. The article contains several different ways animal experimentation could be replaced. It also goes in depth in our main uses for animal testing and the estimated time that we will create an effective way to test. This is a credible source due to its references as well as its statistical information.
Aiziz, Tipu., and Stein, John. “Animal Testing: TV or Not TV? Two Views on whether scientists believe that animal experimentation is necessary should become public advocates or work quietly behind the scenes.” Nature. 470.7335 (2011): 457. Academic OneFile. Web. 16 July, 2015. The main subject of this article discusses the way the media interprets animal experimentation. This article provides an insight on how academic researchers are threatened, bullied, and accused of animal cruelty. It also well evaluates the ideology that there is only a bad and good view on the subject when it comes to the media debating on emotional stances.
Chang, Maria L. “Animal research: right or wrong?” Science World 23 Mar, 1998:8. Academic Onefile. Web. 17 July
…show more content…
The article also describes the concepts of why people may believe that natural products are less effective than chemically produced products and lists vegan alternatives. This source is credible due to its organizations listed and an in-depth examination or vegan products verses chemically based products.
Mann, Michael D. and Ernest D. Prentice. “Should IAUCs Review Scientific Merit of Animal Research Projects?” Lab Animals 33.1 (2004): 26-31. Academic OneFile. Web. 20 July, 2015. This journal describes several pros and cons of why scientific merit should or should not recognize animal research projects. It balances the weight on both sides of the argument and it fails to be biased. This source is unbiased and doesn’t take favor to either side of the argument. It solely touches base on both viewpoints.
Regan, Tom. “The Rights Of Humans And Other Animals.” Ethics and Behavior 7.2 (1997): 103 Academic Search Complete, Web. 17 July

Related Documents