The Pros And Cons Of Meat Eating

I believe that there is nothing wrong with eating meat because it has developed humans for millions of years and is also a natural occurring process. However, I do believe that the method of which we obtain our meat including factory farming is unethical and needs to be changed. The amount of respect that humans have for the animals we eat is miniscule, and it needs to be fixed. Similar to Pollan’s viewpoint on meat-eating and the process of obtaining meat, I believe that animal experimentation is for a good cause such as medical breakthrough and research for developing pathogens. However, there is a big lack of respect for the creatures that we test with. With that being said, I do not support the unnecessary harm and brutality that some …show more content…
Dating back to The Cruelty to Animals Act of 1876, mankind, especially the British, have been looking to protect laboratory animals and their rights (Lane-Petter 118). Modern protest to unethical animal testing has appeared in forms of laws, alternative suggestions, and improvements within the lab setting. For example, the UK passed the Animals Scientific Procedures Act of 1986, requiring extensive assessment in experiments that involve animals, then comparing the benefits of the project and the costs of the animal’s suffering (Festing and Wilkinson). Hopefully this act will eliminate animal testing that isn’t necessary for human medical development or survival. William S. Stokes, toxicity expert and zoologist suggests that practicing animal refinement (minimizing or eliminating pain in research animals) is a good way to enhance the well-being of laboratory animals. Animal Refinement relates to using anesthetics and tranquilizers, and providing appropriate veterinary care (18). I agree with this statement, and I don’t think that it’s asking for too much. The only thing some research companies would lose is a little bit of money to assure the end of most suffering for