Andrew Jackson's Tumultuous Relationship With Native Americans

Great Essays
Native Americans and Americans always have had a very tumultuous relationship. Starting from the first discovery and then colonization of the Native American's land; Americans pillaged and plundered villages, which purposefully depleted the Native American population. The tumultuous relationship boiled over when Andrew Jackson, known for his hatred of the British and Native Americans, signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830 (Tindall and Shi 342). The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Native Americans land west of the Mississippi River in exchange for the land in the south and in the east (Tindall and Shi 342). The removal of the Native American's was primarily for land and urbanization of that land, which were held by the Native Americans at that point. The Native Americans were then forcefully removed by the United …show more content…
Strengths of his remarks include his sincerity as he tries to help the Native Americans as much as he can before they leave their sacred land. His use of pathos and him trying to show how much he cares by saying “This is no sudden determination on the part of the President, whom you and I must now obey (Scott). Weaknesses of his remarks though not many include his semi-approval of the heinous act as well as telling the Cherokee that they have been lackadaisical because they have not followed the orders earlier and left. John Ross in his letter “Our Hearts are Sickened” evokes in the Native Americans a sense of distrust in the American people and makes many believe that even though the Cherokee have tried to assimilate it has had no effect and he wants his nation to be recognized. Strengths of Ross include his argument for why the Cherokees should be a nation; in his argument, he says “We have learned your religion. We have read your sacred books. Hundreds of our people have embraced their doctrines, practiced the virtues they teach, cherished the hopes they awaken,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Andrew Jackson played an important role in the age of economic nationalism and growing political sectionalism. Economic nationalism is a circumstance in which a country attempts to preserve its personal economy by minimizing the amount of imports and investments from other countries. Political sectionalism is the support of a particular part of the United States of specific political interests. Economic nationalism and political sectionalism can be seen in Andrew Jackson’s actions in the South Carolina nullification crisis, the Bank War, and the Indian Removal. Andrew Jackson argued that the legitimization for state invalidation of government laws was misinformed, unlawful, and treasonous to the nation.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    How did the American government shift from an “expansion with honor” policy to a policy of the expulsion of the Cherokee people? The Cherokee people were once a great nation whose population spanned all across the South Eastern corners of the North American continent. The Cherokee people once called states such as North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Kentucky, and Virginia home. The Cherokee people once governed their own nation, a nation where men hunted and women farmed. A nation where both men and women worked together in harmony as a balance for each other, an equilibrium.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Catherine Uruchima E Period DBQ Essay Under President Andrew Jackson’s presidency, on May 28, 1830, he was authorized by the law to pass the Indian Removal Act since he didn’t tolerate the Indians. This was removing Indian tribes to reserved territory west of the Mississippi River to take over their ancestral homelands for white Americans. The United States’ policies towards the Native Americans in the Southeast was unfair and unjustified. The led up to the Trail of Tears.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there was one lesson I could teach it would be the gruesome treatment of Native Americans under Andrew Jackson’s presidency. Prior to Jackson’s presidency Native Americans had been treated poorly. Since the arrival of the first Europeans the natives had experienced abuse and enslavement. Some were brutally slaughtered in wars over territory or had been exposed to diseases. Others were forced to assimilate to European ideals.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most well-known acts of Jackson’s doing was the forced relocation of Native American tribes from the Southeast by way of the Indian Removal act. The Trail of Tears is a reminder of the cruelty he indorsed towards those not Caucasian. He did not see them as deserving the full rights he and other white Americans were afforded, regardless of the fact that America was occupied by them centuries prior to Europe’s arrival. I highly disagree with the resettlement he forced upon the Native Americans. It was their land, yet he forced hundreds of innocent Native women, men, and children to trek upon miles of unknown land with no protections from the harsh elements at all.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Louisiana Purchase Dbq

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After the successful succession of the original Thirteen Colonies from Great Britain the idea of Manifest Destiny became prevalent in America. Manifest Destiny is the American belief that they have the divine right to expand and push westward. Due to this belief, after the 19th century Americans would have acquired a vast majority of the land in the continent. However, before this could occur there would be negotiations, war, and dispute that took place throughout the 1800s-1850s. This period involved disputes including the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, conflict with other countries, The Annexation of Texas, and the settlement in Oregon.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Trail of Tears was a series of forced removals of Native American nations from their ancestral homelands in the Southeastern United States to a piece of land that was designated as Native Territory. In 1803 the Indian Removal Act was passed leading to the removal of the Creeks, Chickasaws, Choctaws, Seminoles, and Cherokees were relocated off their land. The trek was over 1,000 miles long and thousands of people died while being transported. Before the Indian Removal Act, the tribes were thriving in the southeastern United States. White americans saw American Indians as unfamiliar, alien people, causing them to try to “civilize” them by trying to make them as much like white americans as possible.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Finally, the Indians were being taken away from something that clearly belonged to them for a long time which was…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was a war in 1812, between the Natives and the white settlers, and the Natives were defeated because of a surprise attack. As the settlers continued to move west, President Jackson decided to escort the Natives out, by making the Indian Removal Act. The author’s perspectives of the Indian Removal Act and the…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since descendants of Americans came to America we have always had conflicts with the Native Americans also known as the indians. Either it be a war between the two different races or just fighting over irrelevant things. One of the unforgettable events with Americans and the Native Americans was the Trail of Tears which involves the Cherokee nation. When the Americans moved the indians off of the eastern lands and moved them west, it killed off of thousands of Native Americans making it a very memorable and important impact on American history. Strictly defined, the Trail of Tears is the main route or routes that the Cherokees took from the Southeast to the land the U.S. government identified as their new home in Indian Territory (Bjornlund…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief John Ross had a valid and undeniably strong argument against the 1835 Treaty of New Echota. He argues that treaty “is a fraud upon the government of the United States and an act of oppression on the Cherokee people” (John Ross’s Letter). He states that the Cherokee people, which was over 15,000 people, would never had agreed to the treaty and the treaty was made wrongfully. He argues that there should be another meeting and the Cherokee people should be equally consulted. John Ross uses a valid piece of evidence to support his argument.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

               To many people, it may seem that the Native Americans got a bum deal when it came to the Indian Removal Policy. The Native Americans actually did fairly well. They ended up avoiding more severe conflict with the European American Settlers as they pressed more and more into the indigenous peoples land. The Native Tribes received a substantial amount of land west of the Mississippi, away from the European Americans, and were given total sovereignty over the land. Even though a portion of the Native Americans died during their relocation, some of it forced relocation, they were still granted protection and aid by the United States government as to keep them from being attacked by the settlers or taken over by another nation.…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson made a policy in the 1780s to assimilate American Indians into white society. Andrew Jackson, however, passed a policy of removing Cherokees from their lands to the west of the Mississippi in the 1830s. The common goal of the two policies was to acquire Indian lands because the white colonists wanted to expand westward. Battles went on between the Americans and the American Indians, as one tried to take as the other tried to protect the lands. The policies the presidents passed was to take the lands of the Indians, but they had different ways of doing so.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How did this go on for many years? Was this just another way for the United States to control the Native American…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays