Andrew Jackson A Good President Essay

Improved Essays
What do you consider a good president? Some consider a good president to be one that makes choices to change the country in a good way, and someone who does what is best for the people. Most people would consider Andrew Jackson to be a good president, because of the way he revolutionized the presidential campaign. Also he vetoed bills that he thought to be unfit or unnecessary. But I would consider him as a bad president, because of the multiple times he was cruel and unjust to the Native Americans, and his strong hunger for power. Jackson’s cruel acts on the Native Americans, such as the trail of tears and the Indian removal act of 1830, are two of the worst things to have happened in American history. The Indian removal …show more content…
Not only the fact that he abused his power to veto, and also attempted to be more powerful than the congress, but he used his power to kick thousands of Indians of their homes. Although the congress shot down his bill to remove the Native Americans, he still got his way by signing the bill himself, which shows his eagerness to take complete control of the country. Note, that not only did he sign the bill himself that, but he broke many agreements that he had set in pace with the Native Americans just so that we could expand to the west. In 1830 Jackson also vetoed the Maysville road bill, which would’ve made the federal governments purchase of stock for the road only within Kentucky. The only reason he didn’t allow the bill is because the roads would’ve been built in the hometown of his longtime foe Henry Clay Jackson. Also on July 10th, 1832, Jackson vetoed the bill that would have re-instated the charter for the second bank of the United States of America. It was one of the most definitive acts that happened during his presidency. This sums up why I believe Andrew Jackson was not a good president. A good president would not put the lives of many innocent people in jeopardy to try to steal power and centralize himself in the government. For these reasons I feel that Andrew Jackson was not a good president even though he made a few good and important decisions during

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many people believe that Andrew Jackson was a good beneficial president, and many people believe that he was an evil one. I am here to tell you that he was a man of corruption, not because of his persona, but because of his brutal acts towards the Native American people.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson was a very controversial President. There are multiple positives and negatives to Andrew Jackson. Andrew is America’s great worst President. I am going to discuss and tell you if you he was a good or bad President is his term from March 4, 1829- March 4, 1837. Before Andrew Jackson was President, he had nine slaves. By the time he was a President he had nearly 150 slaves. He was given the title of an Elite Planter.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Andrew Jackson a “good” president? The presidency of Andrew Jackson has sparked controversy as to whether or not he really was the patriotic war-hero many have made him out to be. Despite the speculation of Jackson’s success as president, it can be agreed upon that Andrew Jackson made great strides for the United States during his imperfect presidency.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He thought that the foreign influences on the Bank were wrong and that the Bank hurt “the little guy” though his claims were incorrect. The Supreme Court had ruled the National Bank constitutional, for it was necessary and served the purpose of regulating currency and keeping little banks in check. Being the man that he was, Jackson vetoed the proposal to recharter the Bank. Losing the bank lead to an economic depression, and therefore, Jackson ended up hurting the people he wanted to “help”. As a result, Andrew Jackson was more powerful than the Supreme Court and Congress, which proves he was a monarchical president. Congress censured Jackson’s veto of the bank, which only reinforces the fact that Jackson did things for his own good and needed to be kept in…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opposers of Jackson believed he ignored the separation of powers among the three branches of government. A cartoon that appeared in the presidential election of 1832 depicted Jackson as “King Andrew The First” with veto power in his hand while stepping on the Constitution and National Bank and Internal Improvements bill. Clearly, Jackson acted without congressional approval and felt more superior than the Constitution. Instead of letting the people make decisions, Jackson holds ultimate authority and abuses the veto power. His autocratic views also led to a resentful response from Daniel Webster. Webster’s reply to Jackson’s Bank veto message states, “(President Jackson’s message)…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He accomplished some goods things during his presidency but in the end the bad he did outweighed the good. The U.S was a unique country in that time we had a government like no other. We place trust in are Checks and Balances system that no branch of government becomes too powerful. Where a leader of our goes against that it totally breaks how are government works. America is not a monarchy not only one person is in charge that system put there for a reason we have to abide by that. The amendments are the rights of the people apart of the constitution the supreme law of the land. Nobody has the power to take that away from us. If people want to write about what they believe the 1st amendment protects that. Andrew Jackson seemed like he wanted a monarchy more than a democracy. Not abiding by the checks and balances system, and taking out right away of the 1st amendment. This is not someone that should have lead our…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I also disagree with the way he attempted to force the states to rescind the right to turn down Federal decisions that were not done with the interests of the states in mind. Jackson encouraged a strong federal government. When the Nullification Crisis occurred, he was known to actively threaten those who would go in opposition to the federal government’s decision, despite the fact that they had the right to. He was furious that South Carolina would dare defy his rule and nullify the tariff he had placed benefiting industries in the North. He went as far as to threaten to…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the most common complaints is that he ruled as a monarch; ignoring the Constitution in order to benefit himself and his supporters. Document E of the Jackson DBQ is a political cartoon that portrays Jackson as a monarch who abuses his veto power. “King Andrew the First” did actively use his veto power causing less to get done in the US government; however, one shouldn’t judge Jackson by quantity. He had sufficient reason for many of his vetoes. In his Bank Veto Message to Congress, Jackson writes, “I sincerely regret that in the act before me I can perceive none of those modifications of the bank charter which are necessary, in my opinion, to make it compatible with justice, with sound policy, or with the Constitution of our country” (DBQ 117). For the entirety of the message, Jackson continues to clarify his reasoning behind the bank veto and it actually makes sense. Jackson was also accused of being a supporter Indian Removal because he gave the Indians the option to either conform to white civilization or leave their homelands. One Indian responded to Jackson’s proposal with the…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, Andrew jackson was not always considered a good guy. History.com says “When a man named charles richison called jackson a worthless coward, jackson challenged his accuser to a duel.” On reference.com it says “The major negative thing Andrew Jackson is remembered for is the forced relocation of many Native Americans.” This is important because this tells you that some people were not entirely impressed with what he did. Although he did do thing people were not happy about but he was still a brave man who accomplished lots of things during his time as…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After becoming president, Andrew Jackson felt that he had the power to put anyone in any position of power. He ruled like a monarch, giving power to his family and friends. He fired ten percent of the federal government and committed nepotism. The power was given to unqualified people, leaving Jackson to make most of the decisions for the country. He used his power to benefit his family, friends, and himself rather than the country.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson almost always ignored the law, he killed innocent people, and kidnapped a baby from the baby's dead mother. This may be a shock to the people who see Andrew Jackson on the twenty dollar bill. Andrew Jackson is a thief , A liar, and a murder. Andrew Jackson should not be on the twenty dollar bill.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson is extremely controversial in the eyes of many people. In the cases of the Indian Removal Acts and The Bank Crisis he was quite problematic. As for the Indian Removal Acts, in 1890 Jackson forced all Native Americans to move west of the Mississippi. This affected five major Native American groups to make the treacherous journey on The Trail of Tears (of which over 3,500 people died). What makes this even more unbelievable is that the Supreme Court ruled 8:1 against him putting this Act into action.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of his greatest accomplishments as president was when he became involved in a battle with the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson took a stand towards this monopoly and vetoed its re-charter bill, charging the bank with unfair economic privilege. Even though Jackson was popular with the common man, his presidency did have some controversies. One policy that is up for debate is how Jackson dealt with the Native Americans. In 1830, many southerners wanted Native Americans to move out of their land and in response; Jackson urged congress to pass the Indian Removal Act (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). This sought to negotiate the exchange of Indian lands in the south for new lands in American territory (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). The Jackson Administration urged many Native Americans to sell their land and move out of the southern territory which a ajority did; however, the Cherokee Indians refused to move and went to the Supreme Court (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 253). The Supreme Court eventually ruled that the Cherokee Indians be allowed to remain on their land, but Jackson decided to force them out of the southern territory, along a Trail of Tears, that ended in Oklahoma (Lapanskey-Werner, et al page 254). Many people criticized Jackson for these actions, calling them inhumane and cruel, but Andrew Jackson’s focus was for the interest and welfare of the people of United States. Even…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the decisions that Jackson made were based strongly on his different background. We see this in his strong opposition to the national bank and also see how his personal life intermingled itself in this affair. Nicholas Biddle, the wellborn president of the national bank, was everything that Jackson was not and therefore was a strong enemy to Jackson. Due to this, Jackson made it a goal of his presidency to close the national bank. Andrew also felt this system benefited the northern industry more than the southern farmers. Jackson began to do this by starving the bank by moving millions of dollars from the bank to the individual state banks. When Henry Clay accelerated the deadline of the bank’s charter’s renewal, Jackson vetoed it. The effects of this were widespread; America later fell into a depression that lasted six years. Much of this was rooted in that banks lost trust without gold backing in the currency. Jackson attempted to fix the problem by passing the Specie Circular, requiring land purchasers to pay in gold coins or specie. But due to the general lack of gold, many banks were forced to close and thus brought America deeper into depression. Many people lost their money and trade slowed tremendously without the exchange vector the National Bank had served. Andrew Jackson had done this mainly to benefit the southern farmers who couldn’t get loans for land, but ended up hurting the entire economy as well as the rest of the nation, creating problems for many presidents to come. The majority of the north hated Jackson for these reasons. Jackson also passed a tariff or a tax on exports. Southern farmers were aghast at this, as it would make it much harder to sell their goods and would also lower their profit margin, which already was extremely small. Jackson had intended to increase manufacturing and the…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson was well liked by Americans and was seen as a man of the people. Jackson gained support from all different social classes and groups of people; this helped him win the 1828 presidential election. Jackson took office with intentions to cleanse the government of corruption and restore the nation’s finances. One of the first things Jackson did when he took office was creating the Spoils System. About ten percent of the government officers were replaced by Jackson due to their incompetence, corruptness, and overall dislike of Jackson. President Jackson, however, liked to call it “the principle of rotation in office” by allowing more citizens to participate and avoid becoming a bureaucracy. Unlike any previous president, Jackson vetoed 12 bills that he believed to be a matter of policy rather than just unconstitutional. Yet he had no intentions of extending federal authority at expense of the…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays