Analysis Of Ronald Takaki's A Different Mirror

Improved Essays
In Ronald Takaki’s, A Different Mirror, he provides readers with insights about the racial and ethnic diversity of the United States and how those differences impacted the country. Each chapter has a “master narrative” either an immigrant or people from America that just landed there. It’s interesting to see what certain groups have gone through to come to America or what they experienced in the developing nation. Some of the groups such as Native Americans had a rough time when the American settlers started to push them off their land and so on. In chapter 4 the main idea or message were to the Native Americans that they should adapt or face extermination. That was the main problem for the native American’s during that time, the Americans would say they would allow the natives to have land at times but then suddenly go back on there word and push them off. In the …show more content…
Jackson believed that the Native Americans were in the way of advancement to the American society and that they simply can’t survive in white society. Certain laws and treaties were enforced but necessarily not followed. The 1802 Indian Trade and Intercourse Act had provided that no land cessions could be made except by treaty with a tribe, and that federal rather than state law would operate in Indian Territory. In 1832, after the Supreme Court ruled that states couldn’t legally extend their jurisdiction into Indian Territory, Jackson refuses to enforce the Court’s decision. He was actively working on and in favor of Indian removal. “Jackson uprooted seventy thousand Indians from their homes and drove them west of the Mississippi River. He was clearing the way for the rise of the Cotton Kingdom”(Tamaki 82). This showed how disrespected the native American’s were from the society. The native American’s had no choice to stay they would have been attacked by the American

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Inskeep, Steve. Jacksonland: President Andrew Jackson, Cherokee Chief John Ross, and a Great American Land Grab. Penguin Group USA, 2016” In Jacksonland by Steve Inskeep talks about the different states and different territories that were divided by the “white men “and American Indians own concepts of democracy. Inskeep interlaces together the stories of Andrew Jackson a general, president and author of the Indian removal and John Ross chief of the Cherokee.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson impacted the lives of Indians after he signed the Indian removal act of 1830. This was supposed to be a peaceful process for the Indians, but caused many problems, and forced Indians off of their land. There were protests from both Indians and whites who did not agree with the Indian Removal Act, but whites wanted more land. The Indian Removal Act was a turning point in American history because of its impacts in Indian culture, Native relationships with Americans, and the creation of new laws.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a large and populous country with over 300 million people spread out among the states, but it wasn’t always that way. In the 1830s the U.S government was struggling to expand its nation into the frontier. As a result, many people including Andrew Jackson and even Indians like Elias Boudinot found it necessary to move and push the Native Americans west. Jackson strongly believed that the Native Americans should move further west because it will save them from annihilation and will allow white settlers to use and find new land expanding America’s growth (Doc A). This shows how Jackson supported the native American removal because it benefited both people, the Native Americans and white settlers.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This action caused the Indians to suffer, and many of them died along the way. Jackson’s message to congress regarding the Indian removal explained that many Indian tribes were becoming extinct and asked congress to consider setting aside territory west of the Mississippi specially for the Indians (Doc. J). This proposal was used to solely benefit the eastern territory to benefit farmers and working men by opening up lands. Jackson benefitted himself economically at a cost, which was removing the Indians from the territory without their consent, proving his egotistical behavior. Correspondingly, responses from the Cherokee tribe verified Jackson’s injustice.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy”... (Doc 2) Jackson was open minded about the Indian tribes. This allowed him to have a future friendship, or in a sense, loyalty towards each other. This loyalty was carried on for some time and then Jackson authorized all Native Americans to be removed from the Southeast states of Georgia, Mississippi, & Alabama and moved west of the Mississippi River after gold was found on Cherokee land in Georgia. Some of the major tribes that were affected were the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Creek tribes.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson listened to them and created the Indian Removal Act. He presented it to congress and they debated it. Eventually they approved of it and Jackson enforced it. Jackson thought this would be the best way to preserve their cultures and keep peace among the Americans and the Indians. In 1832 he was reelected.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson Dbq

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Jackson Democrats committed themselves to western expansion, which in turn forced more than 120,000 Native Americans that have lived within their respective territories for hundreds of years to move west through the passing of the Indians removal act (textbook). Jackson forced thousands of Native Americans to embark on the Trail of Tears to their new territories, a journey that killed thousands of them. These actions come in direct contrast to the 1831 Supreme Court ruling that allowed for Cherokee Indians to have self rule and for the United States government not to interfere with it (textbook). No person should be able to force the mass movement of a community, especially of one that they do not have specific jurisdiction and rule over, displaying his satisfaction in creating societal turmoil without considering the people that his actions are…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Expansion Dbq

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The source is further valuable because it sheds light on Jackson’s vision of land previously populated with Native Americans; hoping to increase the American population – like in California (1840s population was 8,000 and increased to 379994 during the 1860s) to increase economic development of that area. Despite the ‘positive’ message, the effect of this act was politically destabilising as “It bred a deep distrust of outsiders and government.” from the Native Americans. President Jackson said himself. The latest Act that impacted the Native Americans was the Homestead Act of 1862.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1830, Jackson put forth The Indian Removal Act, which proposed that all of the Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River would be moved west, into Indian Territory. Through this, Jackson believed that he was helping the Indians because in his opinion, having settlers and Indians living in close proximity was not beneficial to either group (“Indian Removal Act” 1). This Act was controversial because many Native American tribes were already promised land, which they were now being forced to leave (“Indian Removal Act” 2). The Cherokee Indian tribes living in Georgia were strongly against the Indian Removal Act due to a treaty with the state claiming that they could keep their land as long as they wanted if they assimilated into American culture (O’Brien 3). The Cherokee tribes had kept their end of the treaty by speaking English and sending their children to schools, but the state of Georgia wanted the land because they had found gold there and the land was fertile for growing cotton.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson almost always ignored the law, he killed innocent people, and kidnapped a baby from the baby's dead mother. This may be a shock to the people who see Andrew Jackson on the twenty dollar bill. Andrew Jackson is a thief , A liar, and a murder. Andrew Jackson should not be on the twenty dollar bill. Andrew Jackson miss treated the native Americans As historians discovered, ¨During the fall and winter of 1838 the Cherokees were forcibly moved west by the united states government.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were a few events that led to the Trail of Tears. Native Americans fought alongside the British in both the French/ Indian war and the Revolutionary war. When the Americans won the war they confiscated some of the Native American’s land. Before the Indian Removal Act, the Cherokee Tribe was recognized by the Government as their own nation. Gold was another reason that Americans were so eager to get them off their land.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was said that President Andrew Jackson was looking in the best interest of U.S. citizens and moved the indians to help keep from conflicts that could possibly lead to war from arising yet again between the United States and the Native Americans or that some Native tribes were just too violent and were seen as a threat by U.S. citizens. It seemed like Americans and Native Americans could not blend and live together peacefully and that is also a said reason why the Trail of Tears…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Professor Daniel Feller talks in his article Andrew Jackson’s Shifting Legacy about how Andrew Jackson has received so much fame. He has not done anything as nearly significant as other presidents have, but yet he is almost always ranked in the top ten presidents. Jackson has a whole era dedicated to him, whereas other presidents simply belong to eras. Some of the main things Jackson did were that he defeated the British at the Battle of New Orleans, dealt with the Nullification Crisis, had famous vetoes, and signed the Indian Removal Act. In Feller’s concluding sentence, he says that Americans will continue to argue about Jackson.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But this was ignored and whites continued to move into Indian Territory. It is reported that U.S president Andrew Jackson responded by saying “Well John Marshall his decision. Now let him enforce it!” Andrew Jackson did nothing to help the Indians or make things better for them. He believed the best thing for them was to move them…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 28th of the year 1830, President Andrew Jackson signed off on a law named the Indian Removal Policy. This granted the United States Government the right to negotiate with the Native American tribes about relocating the Natives from their current home to land west of the Mississippi River. This law was beneficial to the Native Americans on several accounts. The law ended immediate conflict between the Native Americans and the European American Settlers harassing them, it gave them new land to settle instead of just leaving them with no place to go, and even though some relocations were forced instead of voluntary, the law stated that the Native Americans would be provided with protection and aid during and after their relocation.  The…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays