Analyzing Kant's Critique Of Pure Reason

In his Critique of Pure Reason, Kant argues that because humans are only able to judge objectively, we are closed off from a greater perception and understanding of the world. Things in the phenomenal realm are based upon our interactions and experiences with objects whereas things in the noumenal realm are the simplified form of the things themselves and project the reality of the world in a way that humans are unable to see. Additionally, Kant attributes things in the phenomenal realm as having a priori knowledge, or knowledge that requires no prior experience regarding the subject. Because things in the noumenal realm are isolated from our experience, it is nearly impossible for us to know the complexities of the noumenal realm. Furthermore, …show more content…
In the 18th century, one’s worldly perception was purely based on travels or readings one did on the subject matter, however, today, we are able to explore the world without ever leaving our homes. The internet is full of millions, if not billions, of perspectives on nearly every idea, opinion, and event. The internet allows for information to be spread in a matter of seconds as opposed to the weeks it took for letters to be delivered in the 18th century. This rapid exchange of information allows for the gaps, previously occupied by waiting for responses from others to arrive via horseback, to be filled with the exchange of even more information. Consequently, the perspectives of modern-day people have the potential to maximize the amount of other perspectives taken in, allowing for a more broadened human perspective altogether. While this does not relate to the metaphysical “world” Kant was referring to, the opportunity to readily speak to millions of people worldwide has opened a door, regarding the spreading of our ideas, throughout every corner of the