False News, And Information Literacy By William Badke: Article Analysis

Decent Essays
In the article “Post-Truth, False News, and Information Literacy” by William Badke he talks about fake news. Badke tells us how the digital age has made it easier for people to believe fake news. He explains why the internet should have filters and be controlled. Badke goes on to say because of so many false hoods people develop a “World view.” That their view is based on what they deem true. Even if facts prove otherwise. Badke says that there are so many voices out there. Each one telling us different sides to the same story, because of this we feel like we are bound to choose one. Bedke’s solution to the problem is to filter the internet. He gives reasons how it would improve the internet, but never really explains in detail to how it would …show more content…
People will always find a way to get through. To put as filter on the whole internet is unimaginable. The internet is so large it would take a lifetime to just to plan. Even if it was possible how would it distinguish between personal sites or fake news. Badke gives a solution that isn’t a solution at all. He doesn’t talk about the long process it would take to create such an algorithm. Also it would be completely point less because fake news sites will find a way around it.
Badke explains in one of his paragraphs about how Facebook came up with a fact checker, but even fake news has facts. Even with the checker it doesn’t remove the article. The Fact checker just tells you the article may not be reliable.
Badke also talks about training people to read and fact check every article that comes up on their site. One reason wrong with that is humans make errors, so in general it would defeat the purpose. A second reason is if it’s a small company they may not have the money to bring a person on and train them. A third reason is most companies already have this, and they still post false articles. Companies that's purpose is to draw people in will sometimes post unreliable articles. As long as they believe it’ll bring people in they will use
…show more content…
What Badke never addresses in his new is the reason why there is so much, or why it keeps happening. The main reason there will always be fake new is attention. There are sites out there that know what they are posting is fake, but if it sounds real enough and will bring attention they will still post it. All it takes is one person to agree and spread the article. Also many people get their resources from places that aren’t reliable and they don’t bother to check, so then they themselves write a fake article and the cycle keeps going. Badke only talks about the audience that reads these articles. Without the full story his solutions don’t solve the problem. You can’t finish a puzzle with a missing piece.
Lastly Badke blames the internet for whole problem, but fake news has always been around. At the very beginning Badke states that since newspapers had to be approved fake news didn’t get published. That’s where he is wrong because they had to go through a second person is why it gets ran. All companies want to make money. If the person writing the article can make it sound it believable enough and the company agrees it’ll get ran. Before the internet many newspaper companies would run fake news if it would bring attention. They only care about how many copies of the paper they can get sold.
Badke gives many good points in his article, but what he fails to address one whole side to the problem. He also gives

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Fake News Analysis

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages

    No. In general, this topic is definitely in the “now” and can be seen as a prevalent issue. If most people who would normally get their information from online sources, specifically receiving headliners from websites like Facebook and Google do read these headlines, but don’t delve into the source itself, it becomes a very dangerous and grey area of information collecting. In some cases, the sources are completely false and in others, aspects of the original story have been skewed to fit the perspective of the group generating the content’s message. Even when people watch TV and read newspapers, they will scroll to a headline in which they find interesting.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evaluation Essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” is a widespread essay written by Nicholas Carr. The essay is about how desired technology is making people think differently and how maybe google is being a little too helpful when someone is in need of an answer. Carr takes writing to a whole new level when he goes in depth to explain what the internet is doing to a human brain. He uses his own experiences and feelings to evaluate how he feels and what he believes on the effects of modern technology. Based on superior evidence, a strong view on the subject, and showing the changes Google is doing to a person’s way of thinking, the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr is a great representation to show how technology is affecting…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wikipedia Is Credible

    • 1369 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some people say that Wikipedia is on its way to becoming a credible source by having many individuals critique each and every article to make it reliable information. Others say that Wikipedia was doomed from the start because any one can put information on the site and it may take longer than necessary to put take down that false…

    • 1369 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where I do believe the Internet remembers every action of every individual, I think the extent to which he believes people themselves actively remember all this information is entirely blown out of proportion. Although everything is recorded, it does not necessarily mean people remember it all. Though I am sure the prevalence of the Internet makes it more difficult for things to be forgotten, it does not mean it never is. In my experiences with the Internet, certain events, news stories, individuals or anything can be blown up by social media users. This may continue for days, weeks, or even months but at some point, everyone loses interest.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most of his argument is not backed by reliable data, or factual evidence, but instead relies on a personable style. Which would be an effective style, as he writes about the actual feelings of the protestors. The demographic he is attempting to persuade could be more prone to his believable and charged writings. Unfortunately, his argument falls flat due to his lack of professional sources, and not giving enough reasons as to why OWS has made an impact. In a similar fashion, writing for the people reading, Housel, a writer for the motley fool, a website for investors, uses statistical evidence and professional sources to back his findings.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Carr mentions Socrates “bemoaned the development of writing” (Carr). Socrates was scared people would “cease to exercise their memory and become forgetful” but not one person today will argue that the creation of the written language was a detrimental thing to our society (Carr). Even though there is almost exactly the same argument presented, Carr is still arguing against the internet. Carr says he feels like someone is “tinkering with his brain” but for someone who is part of an older generation, the internet is too much for them to handle properly (Carr). It might just be the case that we, the younger generation, are able to handle and process the internet more clearly than someone who grew up without it.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daykin has successfully reasoned points which provide evidence that social media is to blame, but since Daykin provides examples from his opinion, it causes his credibility to weaken. After reasoning socials media’s algorithms, is it social media’s fault for communing individuals with similar interest? After all, social media was developed to expand individuals who share common interest, but Daykin focuses on the negative aspect of social media; therefore, he gives a bias side conversation accordingly to what warned in his writing. Although, Daykin has partially supported his question, he could have provided more proven evidence to match his argument and the opposing side of his argument. However, the underlying question remains, is social media to blame for their algorithms or is it society’s way of handling…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Search engines are often unreliable, but people believe what they read off search engines anyway. People never look for a guarantee that what they read on the internet is correct, they just believe it because it was typed on the internet (Flanagin). This models that people are becoming completely gullible and will believe anything they read, no matter how false it could appear. Second, because answers are available at the click of a button, no one learns to think for themselves. Students are increasingly so dependent on the internet for their information that critical thinking programs that do not address the form and quality of persuasion that medium are flirting with the anachronistic pedagogy.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bradbury pictured books being outlawed because people would become anti-intellectual. There is ammunition for Bradbury’s views too. People do spend hours on websites instead of actually using their time to gain real knowledge. Bradbury did not foresee that social media would be created by us. He also did not look at the other benefits of social media, which is communication.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Online writing does pay a little better if you are writing academic essays for students, but the sad fact is that it is difficult to bluff your way through. You can research and write about most subjects, but if you make an educated guess and get it wrong, then you are going to suffer dreaded occurrence of “Amendments.” Amendments are the most hated things that writers come across. Having people demand you rewrite or change something is enough to drive most writers to insanity. It is like finishing a jigsaw and somebody pulling out pieces and telling you they do not go there when you are sure they do. Living with the fact the pay is very…

    • 1029 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays