Leibniz Cosmological Argument

Great Essays
Show More
Analysis of Leibniz cosmological argument for the existence of God

The purpose of cosmological arguments is to start with the subject the universe and trace it back to the root that being the cause which according to Leibniz is an infinite necessary being. Profound philosophers used this method in order to enable the general public and academics to seeing the correlation between the universe, and its source God. Leibniz’s main objective was to take Aquinas 's foundation within his cosmological argument and tweak it until absolute clarity was established with what he entitled Principle of sufficient reason. By absorbing Aquinas’s interpretation he complied with Aquinas’s account, that the sole premise of necessity was enough to display the …show more content…
For Leibniz when pertaining to a subject matter such as the world the only adequate answer, is the existence of God. He completely, utterly eliminates the conception that it could be crafted by any other mortal craftsmen. Considering if something as a physical property and a living component that means it as the potentiality to no longer remain existent. Therefore, for a being to create the universe it would need not only to be non physical but, spiritual and abstract(Pikkert,Owen.Nov 17th.2016). Hence, Leibniz denies any other physical body being capable of infinite capabilities. Why does Leibniz intuitively search for a source one might ask? due to the cosmological argument. The premise behind the argument stands, we can all comply to agreement that the universe exists, we can all come to the mutual agreement that there must be an explanation due to the principle of sufficient reason. Hence, that explanation must be God, the ultimate source. Broken down

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pangloss In Voltaire's Candide
    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pangloss In Voltaire's Candide

    At the beginning of his novel, “Candide,” Voltaire introduces the character Pangloss and his greatest philosophical and spiritual ideas he passes to Candide and Cunégonde: “Pangloss gave instruction in metaphysico-theologico-cosmoloonigology. He proved admirably that there cannot possibly be an effect without a cause and that in this best of all possible worlds the Baron’s castle was the best of all castles and his wife the best of all possible Baronesses. It is clear, said he, that things cannot be otherwise than they are, for since everything is made to serve an end, everything necessarily serves the best end. Observe: noses were made to support spectacle, hence we have spectacles.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    In 1968 a philosopher named H.J. McCloskey wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist,” which attacked the main arguments held by theists. The main arguments that he refers to as “proofs” are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the ontological argument. McCloskey’s article debunks these arguments as being false and without proof. He states that theists should dismiss the idea of God entirely. He claims in his opening statements that he will show reasons why theists should be miserable just because they are theists (1).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Fine Tuned Universe Argument
    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fine Tuned Universe Argument

    In this paper I will analyze the argument of the “Fine-Tuned Universe”, describe what it means, show how an opponent would argue that intelligent design isn’t the best explanation, and also provide my own view on this argument from my theist view. Have you ever wondered how the universe got here? How everything perfectly fell into place, and how you’re here today? The Fine Tuned Universe argument may help you better understand. This argument is a version of the teleological argument, which is an argument for an intelligent creator, that basically suggests there are many very specific things that make life possible, and if any of these very specific things were to be altered, life as we know it would be highly unlikely to exist.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Nagel's Cosmological Argument
    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Nagel's Cosmological Argument

    The cosmological argument takes the presence of the universe to involve the presence of a being that made it. It is an argument that begins from the presence of the universe, and from endeavors to demonstrate the presence of God. This argument draws on involvement from the material world. It is crucial to know that the most this contention can plan to demonstrate is that there exists a vital being who caused everything in the universe. Nagel’s summary of this argument is as follows:…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Leibniz's Discourse On Metaphysics
    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Leibniz's Discourse On Metaphysics

    Finally, I will discuss how Leibniz believed that final causes are everywhere and that his beliefs, while unconventional, are unerring because God put a blueprint in us with a path that we uncover as we grow old. The definition that Aristotle used when describing efficient cause, and the one that most philosophers use, is a source of an object that brings it into being or initiates motion to start or stop. Efficient cause is used to explain mostly everything that happens in the world. Leibniz states in section 22 that it is not wrong to use this method of explanation as, “it goes deeper and in some sense more immediate and a priori, is, on the other hand, quite difficult when one comes to details…”…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas: The Existence Of God
    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St. Thomas Aquinas: The Existence Of God

    Before St. Thomas Aquinas gave an answer to the question whether God exists in things, he, in I.7, answered that God is limitless. The characteristic of limitless things is to exist with an unending amount everywhere in everything . Then he asks about God’s existence in things, I.8.1-4. He is trying to answer the questions: Is God in all things, Is God everywhere, Is God everywhere by essence, power, and presence, and Does it belong to God alone to be everywhere? These questions and their answers are a significant component of Aquinas’s understanding of the natural world.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God
    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument: Proving The Existence Of God

    Cosmological argument The cosmological argument is a well known argument that attempts to prove the existence of God. The most common leader of the argument is Thomas Aquinas who devised Five Ways to prove the existence of God, which he referred to as “demonstration.” It comes to the conclusion that God exists from posteriori because it focuses on cause and effect to come to an assumption that God exists, which contrasts with the priori approach to the ontological argument. Linear religions generally accept that God made the universe ex nihilo because in Genesis God existed at the beginning of time; therefore, He must be the cause of the universe because you can’t have an effect without a cause.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Assess The Cosmological Argument
    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assess The Cosmological Argument

    “There is sufficient reason to believe that God is the cause of the universe” The cosmological argument is a multitude of arguments that have been developed to modern day ideas. These arguments are based on natural theology; this is when someone has knowledge of God based on experiences. It is a philosophical argument that aims to prove the existence of God. The cosmological argument rejects the idea of infant regress because if that is the cause there is no need for God.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Four Elements In Hayy's Cosmology
    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Four Elements In Hayy's Cosmology

    If he didn't see the universe as interconnected, he would not have found his other discoveries of its…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Aquinas The Existence Of God Analysis
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas Aquinas The Existence Of God Analysis

    In an effort to argue for the existence of God, Saint Thomas Aquinas provides five cosmological arguments in his piece “The Existence of God”. The second argument he states examines causes and effects and looks to explain these series in regard to their beginning, or first cause (43:1-2). Aquinas says that the chain of causes and effects cannot go back to “infinity” (43:60) because when the first cause is taken out, so is its effect and every following effect (43:61). I find this claim plausible because this would mean that there would be no “caused” things in existence. Aquinas follows to say that “there obviously are such causes” (43:62) in existence, so the first cause must not have been taken away.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Samuel Clarke's Cosmological Argument Evaluation
    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Samuel Clarke's Cosmological Argument Evaluation

    Sense brute being do not have a cause, they can’t exist through the principle of sufficient reason. The cosmological argument is defended through this…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Ontological Argument
    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Ontological Argument

    The ontological argument is different than the cosmological or teleological arguments as it relies on A Priori knowledge rather than A Posteriori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that you can know prior to any experience; it is known through reason alone. This essay will explore how reliable the ontological argument is. The ontological argument is an argument for the existence of god by St Anselm (1033-1109). Anselm defined god as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived.”…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Christian Science Research Paper
    • 1257 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Christian Science Research Paper

    This world was created by God, the Father-Mother and Great I AM, since time immemorial. The Christian Scientist conception of God is a bit more nebulous than that of traditional Christianity. God isn 't seen necessarily as a distinct being. Rather, according to Mary Baker Eddy, “All is [the] infinite Mind [of God] and its infinite manifestation, for God is All-in-all” (Christian Science, “What is Christian Science?”). Christian Science doctrine stresses the infiniteness of God, who is the Creator and Sustainer of mankind.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    St. Thomas Aquinas's Argument On The Existence Of God
    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages

    St. Thomas Aquinas's Argument On The Existence Of God

    The existence of God is always important in the aspect of philosophy. St. Thomas Aquinas explains what he believes is the five reasons god exists. The five reasons he believes why God exist is the Argument from Motion, Efficient Causes, Possibility and Necessity, Gradation of Being, and Design. The definition of God means that which nothing greater can be meant. St. Aquinas is a known philosopher for his discussions of the relationship between faith and the reasons, including the five reasons and proof why God existence is true, while developing Aristotelian doctrines within the church (PBF 42).…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Derek Parfit Why This? Why Anything?
    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Derek Parfit Why This? Why Anything?

    In “Why This? Why Anything?” Derek Parfit provides his demonstration of the fallibility of providing causal answers for the creation of the universe. In light of the fallibility of causal answers, Parfit seeks to incorporate his response to the creation of the universe with the use of non-causal answers which explains something’s existence in virtue of its properties, rather than attempting to follow an infinite chain of reasoning. While Parfit adequately demonstrates an inability to conform our reasoning to causal interactions for the creation and nature of the universe, his understanding of non-causal answers for the nature of the universe provides little insight into the questions he proposes and provides merely a factual understanding, rather than an explanatory one.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings