John Leslie Mackie Relativity Summary

Great Essays
John Leslie Mackie maintained that there is no objective moral truth. Throughout my essay I aim to establish what Mackie meant by this, I shall then go on to explore his ‘Argument from Relativity’ (more commonly known as the argument from disagreement) which he displays in his paper ‘The subjectivity of Values’ (1977). Finally, I shall investigate an important objection to the argument outlining how Mackie and other scholars respond to these critics. I believe that they respond sufficiently to the criticisms, critics appear to make fundamental misunderstandings regarding the way in which agents construct their beliefs leading them to falsely conclude that objective values exist. As a moral anti-realist Mackie supposes that moral properties cannot exist independently of the mind. Anti-realism is an umbrella term for a range of theories, but Mackie specifically advocates moral error theory and so when he says that ‘There are no objective values’ he is stating that moral values and judgments aim at truth but fail. Therefore, statements regarding morality for example ‘murder is wrong’ despite the general acceptance are not true …show more content…
One way he argued for this was through his argument from relativity in which he supposes the best way to explain the wide spread moral disagreement within society was to conclude that values are relative, and there are no objective truths regarding morality. I deem this to be a successful argument, critics whom provide alternative explanations for this phenomenon make a underlying misunderstanding regarding human nature, placing too much emphasis on facts and underling general principles, both of which appear to play a fairly insignificant role in the construction of moral

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Because the human race is composed of diversified nations and cultures, we cannot establish a succinct, objective moral constitution because of the world’s increasing diversity. It’s difficult to dismantle what has been instilled into your mind all your life because we are constantly faced with emotional ties and personal attitudes. As Mackie stated, there will be the small few who turn against the already established rules for other moral reasons, but this act is simply an extension which arised “out of an existing way of life” (Mackie 651). This supports the idea that somehow we will always be connected to our underlying moral influences and that our individualistic biases never truly go away. Consequently, objectivity cannot be attained since humans are always linked to their thoughts, emotions and feelings which enhances the argument for…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The thesis focuses on the Expressivism and Aristotelian argumentation of Alasdair MacIntyre’s Ethics in the Conflict of Modernity. Throughout my academic career I have delved into various aspects of philosophical, political, and religious teaching all of which have encompassed ideals of theistic ethics. Today, I will present a claim conceived by Alasadair MacIntyre in his book Ethics in the Conflict of Modernity. I will use the other philosophers as the occasion arises as I provide support for my own account of moral choice-making by expressivist and aristotelian views that dominate contemporary moral philosophy.…

    • 2638 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Wolf has not sufficiently address Haidt’s concern that the default value system underlying her lectures is extremely narrow. After all, Wolf clarifies that objective values are not supposed to be used to rank individual lives according to their degrees of meaningfulness. Instead, objective values, or the idea of objective values, ought to help us become more mindful with the…

    • 1282 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mackie opens his article by saying that there is an error in terms of objective morality, he believes that moral judgements assume moral objectivity. Mackie goes on by saying that moral objectively requires two things, one being intrinsic reason giving-power and the capability to categorically motivate us to act. Mackie believes that moral judgements make attempts but fail to explain reality, and that all moral terms are simply false. Mackie continues to say that moral values can be best understood as subjective, and explains how there is a dissimilarity between cultures and their feelings on moral terms and this is caused by the other cultures ways of life. The idea Next, Mackie discusses “argument from queerness” to talk about the idea that…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the book Theories of Relativity written by Barbara Haworth- Attard makes me understand that it is a person's own decision to improve his or her own life no matter how much help is available. I think that it is someone's own choice because in the book Dylan has a lot of help from Ainsley but he never takes it. Also Glen tries to help Dylan but Dylan's life doesn't get better until he accepts the help himself.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Both Harman and Mackie give arguments that bring into question the existence of moral facts. Both Harman and Mackie approach the subject as moral skeptics. I will be using their arguments to argue against the existence of moral facts. Introduction Are there any moral facts? Are there good reasons to believe in the existence of moral facts?…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    While writing this paper, I realized that one of the chief problematic aspects of moral philosophy is in the context of modernity and the contrast between rival traditions. So, what is the ethical conflict in modernity? MacIntyre describes it this way: The histories of expressivist agents are primarily histories of their affections, of what they have cared about and of how they came to care about what they care about. The histories of NeoAristotelians are histories of how they succeeded or failed in becoming better judges of what it is for a human being to flourish qua human being and to act accordingly . . . expressivists are unable to reckon with important aspects of themselves…their activities over extended periods of time can only be…

    • 3268 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ruth Benedict first seeks to demonstrate that perceptions of morality vary between cultures. Only providing one or two examples would evidently be insufficient so we are deluged with many. She dwells on this point, but it is easy enough to grant. However, after wearing us down with these examples, she unexpectedly jumps directly to her conclusion of moral relativity. Unless I am perceiving it incorrectly—which is entirely possible—this is the gist of her argument: cultures have differing views on morality; therefore, morality is relative.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The interesting aspect of morality is how universally unbiased it is supposed to be, but yet, is still met with a debate towards what is morally correct and morally wrong. While morality is supposed to be objective, there is a subjectivity to whom those morals apply to and to whom they benefit or harm. In Chelsea Schein and Kurt Gray’s "The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm,” they discussed the evolution of morality and how difficult it is to establish a clear answer on what morality is. Schein and Gray wrote, “[one] definition of moral judgment is ‘evaluations (good vs. bad) of the actions or character of a person that are made with respect to a set of virtues held to be obligatory by a culture or subculture’ (Haidt, 2001, p. 817)” (Schein and Gray 35).…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In ‘The Subjectivity of Values’, J L Mackie examines error theory and objective morality vs non-cognitivism. Mackie’s report represents moral scepticism using moral error theory. By taking an error theory approach, Mackie confronts morality similarly to the manner in which an atheist confronts religion. Moral error theory could be broken down to a version of the Justified True Belief outline as follows: Moral claims are universally false There is reason to believe that moral claims are universally false There is no justification for believing any deniable claim…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Frege-Geach embedding problem is a problem that challenges expressivism, asking how it could be that moral and descriptive terms have the same semantic properties in complex sentences, but have different meanings. Expressivist theories of moral discourse deny that moral judgments express truth-apt propositions that describe states of affairs in the natural world. Instead, expressivists claim that moral judgments are taken to express non-truth-apt, or non-cognitive, attitudes of approval or disapproval. Therefore, the normative accounts of truth and consistency do not apply to non-truth-apt attitudes. In this paper, I will begin by outlining the Frege-Geach problem, and explain why it should concern the expressivist.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Harman's Argument Analysis

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Harman presents the argument that we never have any evidence for or against any moral claim and that moral “facts” serve no purpose regarding the explanation of making observations unlike scientific facts do. In this essay, I will argue why I believe that Harman’s argument is ultimately successful, successful being that it is convincing of its conclusion. I will accomplish this by first paraphrasing Harman’s premises in an understandable manner. Next, I intend to provide a possible attack that could be used to show how Harman’s argument fails and alter my focus on to why that attack should not succeed as well as delivering a counter-argument to ensure my argument is not one-sided. Finally, I will provide a proper conclusion that summarizes…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays