• Home Page
  • Alasdair Macintyre's Ethics In The Conflict Of Modernity

Alasdair Macintyre's Ethics In The Conflict Of Modernity

Great Essays
Show More
The thesis focuses on the Expressivism and Aristotelian argumentation of Alasdair MacIntyre’s Ethics in the Conflict of Modernity. Throughout my academic career I have delved into various aspects of philosophical, political, and religious teaching all of which have encompassed ideals of theistic ethics. Today, I will present a claim conceived by Alasadair MacIntyre in his book Ethics in the Conflict of Modernity. I will use the other philosophers as the occasion arises as I provide support for my own account of moral choice-making by expressivist and aristotelian views that dominate contemporary moral philosophy.

In this essay I will like to examine the views of Expressivism and Aristotelianism and determine if it is possible or not to align these two autonomous views and confirm their abilities to act in accordance of one another. I shall examine the claim that Alasdair MacIntyre makes as he juxtaposes the established views of Expressivisim and Aristotelianism deeming these two perspectives mutually exclusive and one therefore more beneficial than the other in terms of judgement and/or moral choice making. In turn I will gain valuable insight into both Expressivism, Aristotelianism, and moral decision-making.

In the contemporary field …show more content…
I aligned two opposing views in an attempt to assess whether or not they possessed the abilities to act in harmony with one another. Primarily I argued for the central claim made by MacIntyre in which he contrasts the two perspectives of Expressivisim and Aristotelianism as he establishes his belief that one view was more valuable in terms of judgement and/or moral choice making. Consequently, I was able to hammer down various aspects of this claim. Thus I successfully supported an argument that we lacked any standpoint proving that the claim produced by MacIntyre was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Mackie's The Argument Of Relativity
    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of Mackie's The Argument Of Relativity

    Because the human race is composed of diversified nations and cultures, we cannot establish a succinct, objective moral constitution because of the world’s increasing diversity. It’s difficult to dismantle what has been instilled into your mind all your life because we are constantly faced with emotional ties and personal attitudes. As Mackie stated, there will be the small few who turn against the already established rules for other moral reasons, but this act is simply an extension which arised “out of an existing way of life” (Mackie 651). This supports the idea that somehow we will always be connected to our underlying moral influences and that our individualistic biases never truly go away. Consequently, objectivity cannot be attained since humans are always linked to their thoughts, emotions and feelings which enhances the argument for…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle And Epictetus's Approach To Happiness
    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle And Epictetus's Approach To Happiness

    The ethical theories of both Aristotle and Epictetus, laid out in their books the Nicomachean Ethics and the Enchiridion, respectively, offer humanity insight into the most effective ways to achieve happiness and to exhibit virtue. Aristotle’s approach to happiness is that it must be looked at as the end to a means not as a means to an end. He feels that happiness should be viewed as the highest good within life. Although Epictetus agrees that happiness is the highest attainable good, he believes that the source of humanity’s misery is people’s inability to differentiate between what they can control and what they cannot. While both philosopher’s theories emphasize the importance of happiness and virtue in a person’s life, Epictetus’ view…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Maimonides Rule Utilitarianism
    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Maimonides Rule Utilitarianism

    Maimonides’ theologically-inspired interpretation of rule-utilitarianism draws in foundation from a precept he devotes much ink to settling the merits of: The True Law [the six hundred and thirteen commandments of the Torah] … give[s] us the twofold perfection. It aims first at the establishment of good mutual relations among men by removing injustice and creating the noblest feelings. In this way the people … stay and continue in one condition, and every one can acquire his first perfection [well-being of the body].…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Strawson's Basic Argument Analysis
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Strawson's Basic Argument Analysis

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Role Of Virtue In John Stuart Mill's Nicomachean Ethics
    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Role Of Virtue In John Stuart Mill's Nicomachean Ethics

    In the world of ethics, there lies principles on which to live life by. Among these principles come the great philosophers that created them. Philosophers such as Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. Along with their corresponding theories of Virtue, Nonconsequentialism, and Utilitarianism. These theories have such shaped the world ethics since creation and have continued to influence thinkers even today.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Conflict In Lather And Nothing Else
    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Conflict In Lather And Nothing Else

    Everyone at some point of time in their lives is faced with conflicts whether internal or external. Conflicts occur willingly or unwillingly affecting a person’s mind and actions. The most important thing that a person should remember which dealing with one is their morals. Conflicts can often times lead a person to do something that they don’t want to and in that dilemma comes the question of one’s moral values. In “Gregory” by Paulos Ioannides and in “Lather and Nothing Else” by Hernando Tellez, the dilemma of choosing whether to kill or not and the circumstantial pressure induces internal conflict leading to the struggle of morality.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James Rachels And Stuart Rachel's The Elements Of Moral Philosophy
    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Rachels And Stuart Rachel's The Elements Of Moral Philosophy

    In chapter 9 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors elaborate on the philosophical question, whether there are absolute moral rules. In order to illustrate the philosophical moral question, Rachels uses President Harry Truman’s dilemma on the use of atomic bombs to end World War II and in the process comes in contact with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that moral rules are absolute, the theory of categorical imperative, Kant’s arguments on lying to make the case on moral judgments. First, the Rachels’ use President Harry Truman’s encounter with Elizabeth Anscombe, a 20th century foremost philosophical champion of the doctrine that…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Justice And Justice In Kallipolis
    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Justice And Justice In Kallipolis

    “It turns out that this doing one’s own work - provided that is comes to be in a certain way - is justice” (Plato, 433b). Justice is a helpful tool to preserve all four virtues in the soul. Nonetheless, the soul is divided into three different parts: rational part, spirited part and appetitive part. These aspects of mind correspond to the three classes of the state. Reason must be permitted to rule over the spirited element and rule over the passions, thus to secure justice (Plato, Book IV).…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Frankenstein Moral Code Essay
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Frankenstein Moral Code Essay

    The very concept of a moral code has always been a fluid one. Moreover, normative morality deals with the very perception of right and wrong, which often relies upon an individual’s opinion on how they ought to act; whether that be dictated by society, culture or experience. As a way to find meaning in the apparent meaninglessness of existence; mankind created the mythology of a higher power — something used to explain the unexplainable. This often came in the form of a god or deity. Thus, the concept of morality dictated by church dogma was born.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Charles Taylor's Utilitarianism
    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Analysis Of Charles Taylor's Utilitarianism

    Ethics is a branch of philosophy that, at its core, seeks to understand and to determine how human actions can be judged as right or wrong. There are multiple variations and subclasses of ethical theories. These theories that help us with decision making can be challenged or critiqued. In particular Mill’s Utilitarianism, an ethical theory that promoted the greatest happiness for the greatest number, was criticized by Charles Taylor in his article The Diversity of Goods. The article written by Charles Taylor argues a utilitarian and consequentialist conception of morality leaves out essential aspects of human experience that are integral to our moral lives.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Christian Ethics Summary
    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant Christian Ethics Summary

    The book is designed to provide a textbook that gives insight defining the differences and differing perspectives to Christian Ethics. The book also provides a comprehensive analysis three of the distinct phases of western Christianity. The book is divided into five sections, the first section pertaining to the methodological issues in Christian ethics. The second through section four focuses on the issues in social ethics. Section five pertains to the personal status.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Subjectivity Of Values By J L Mackie
    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Subjectivity Of Values By J L Mackie

    In ‘The Subjectivity of Values’, J L Mackie examines error theory and objective morality vs non-cognitivism. Mackie’s report represents moral scepticism using moral error theory. By taking an error theory approach, Mackie confronts morality similarly to the manner in which an atheist confronts religion. Moral error theory could be broken down to a version of the Justified True Belief outline as follows: Moral claims are universally false There is reason to believe that moral claims are universally false There is no justification for believing any deniable claim…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Four Basic Stanzas Of Metaethics
    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Four Basic Stanzas Of Metaethics

    Absolutism conveys to us that moral statements are absolutely and universally true and binding to all people. Absolutism gives a helpful foundation against which to differentiate the principle perspectives of ethical statements are universally substantial and truly genuine. To this…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Modern And Original Dilemma Analysis
    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Modern And Original Dilemma Analysis

    This essay discusses the Modern and Original dilemma. The Original dilemma touches on freedom versus order while The Modern dilemma focuses on Freedom versus equality. One thing that both of these dilemmas have in common is the four ideologies or belief systems that stem from both delima’s. The four ideologies are Conservative, Communitarian, Libertarian, and Liberal.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle: One Major Similarities Between Aristotle And Kant
    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle: One Major Similarities Between Aristotle And Kant

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings