Analysis Of Abraham Lincoln: Fight Against Slavery

Improved Essays
Abraham Lincoln: Fight Against Slavery
Abraham Lincoln is more than the face of the penny. Abraham Lincoln is one of the famous presidents of the United States of America. In 1861 Lincoln became the 16th president of the U.S he was famous amongst all presidents for his contribution to slavery. Abraham Lincoln followed the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to go about with his plans. Firm believer that one should act according to the law and the key role those two papers played in the fight against slavery.
Abraham Lincoln said in the Fragment on the Constitution and the Union, “The assertion of that principle, at that time, was the word, "fitly spoken" which has proved an "apple of gold" to us. The Union, and the Constitution,
…show more content…
In 1858, Douglas as well as James Buchanan endorsed the decision that was made. The first was that no slave or descendant can be a citizen of the states. Second, was that according to the decision the Constitution has always been pro-slavery. This was backed up by statement provided in Article V of the Constitution where it states that, “… nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” This part was seen as a way of protecting what they saw as property, which were slaves. The third part of this decision was that the US Supreme Court was not to decide whether or not slaves would be able to be brought into free …show more content…
This piece was a response to Stephen Douglas and his opinion on the majority to decide whether they would want to be free or a slave state. Abraham Lincoln intended to destroy Douglas credibility of popular sovereignty. Lincoln accuses Douglas of wanting to spread slavery to all states rather than abolishing it. Lincoln emphasized that Douglas was only using the case of Dread Scott, in which the decision given was that slaves would not be seen as citizens.
Kansas Nebraska Act
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was for a creation of two states which were Nebraska as well as Kansas. This act repealed the Missouri Compromise, in which it was determined that Missouri was admitted as a slave state, Maine would be a free state and further the Louisiana Territory would be free. This compromise was later repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act and later declared unconstitutional by the Dred Scott decision in which it stated that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery.
Gettysburg Address
The 1863 writing about Lincoln was with the intent to uphold the Constitution. In other words, to follow what the intent of the Constitution wanted people to do. The purpose of the Address was to transform the Civil war into a war to abolish slavery. Lincoln wanted the people to end what was started for those who have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case The Supreme Court has dealt with a variety of cases concerning human rights. A particular case that has sparked large controversy in American society is the Walker (TDMV) vs Texas Division Sons of Confederate Veterans case. Unlike previous cases, this case was different in were the decision reached by the court not only impacted those individual involved in the case, but also individuals that were not involved. Difference in opinion over the Confederate flag has made people second guess what it actually symbolizes.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13th Amendment Dbq

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Who was involved in ratifying the 13th amendment and what happened along the ride? Let us start with the question, what is the 13th amendment? The 13th amendment was passed by the Senate on April 8th, 1864, and passed by the House of January 31,1865. The amendment provided that “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction” (“13th Amendment:Abolition of Slavery” 1865). The ratification of this amendment represented the struggle against slavery.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13th Amendment Dbq

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This would be a whole new way of life if the amendment were to go threw, which was incredible in that time period. I am almost for certain that most of the people in the south were completely against what was about to happen, but eventually the amendment was passed and a new life was given to the minority race. Passed by congress…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main political purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was to preserve the union. The unity of the United States has also been in danger because of the geographic divide created by slavery, and this act was created to make sure the southern states would not split. Rather than only creating Nebraska (which would most likely be a free state and throw off the balance of free versus slave states), the act was passed which created Kansas, which would most likely become a slave state. Had Kansas not been created the southern states would have gotten mad, and possibly split from the…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many leaders could not decide whether or not to make slave men and women free. Which was a conflict because of the Declaration of independence, it stated that “all man are created equal”. This was a conflict, especially for Thomas Jefferson since he wrote part of the Declaration of independence. Despite the Declaration of Independence, we have the U.S. Constitution does have something to say about slavery. In the year 1865, we can see that it state “Neither slavery, nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, nor any place subject to their jurisdiction”.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The act repealed the Missouri Compromise as Senator Steven Douglas stated in the act that popular sovereignty would determine if slavery should or should not exist in these territories, while the Missouri Compromise stated that there shall be no slavery passed the 36°30’ line. There were numerous political and social effects this act had on the nation. A major effect would be the increased infuriation of the North from the repeal of the once thought “long-standing” Missouri Compromise. This infuriation led the North to distrust the South and also opened their eyes to what they believed was a Southern obsession with the expansion of slavery. The North would become less lenient to the idea of slavery.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, was a previous slave proprietor from Maryland. The United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. Court’s majority decided that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, believed that blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic,…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was devised as a compromise over slavery in 1854, as the nation was beginning to be torn apart in the decade before the Civil War. In 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act created territories for both Kansas and Nebraska. This gave a chance for people to move slavery to the Midwest.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It would be appropriate to say that “By the 1850’s the constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created” is a valid statement. This is because virtually everyone in the nation, the public, statesmen, and presidents, felt growing tensions over the fate of territories, interpretation of the constitution, and the justification behind the southern secession in relativity to the issue of slavery. The issue of slavery became a huge controversial topic in territories once they were ready for admission into the union. This could be exemplified by the disputes over and whether or not the state of California…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Civil War predictable? Did any events indefinitely cause the South to desire a split from the North? The North and the South had a growing tension between them for many reasons, and the northern abolitionists encouraged a Civil War through their actions of protest. Although many Americans were affected minimally by the changes of the nation, abolitionists inevitably foresaw a Civil War because the growing tensions between the North and the South became apparent in political and social changes, slavery issues, and the growing occurrence of rebellions. Political and social changes occurred in many ways, including The Second Great Awakening, Lincoln’s presidential election to office, the way the North and the South dealt with one another,…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1860, Douglass was perhaps the most famous and respected speaker and abolitionist in America and Europe. At the same moment, Abraham Lincoln was considered an uneducated, uncouth, prairie lawyer and politician who somehow managed to get himself elected President in a three-way race and in a divided…

    • 49 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was an inevitable incident. For decades, the North and South had been splitting apart due to their differing economies, beliefs regarding slavery, and political views, including states ' rights. While there were efforts to resolve the issues, primarily the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850, these were failed endeavors and did not stop the forthcoming events. The South had an economy that heavily relied on agriculture as the primary form of income while the North was becoming an industrial society. With Eli Whitney 's invention of the cotton gin in the early 1790s, many plantations in the South essentially made the switch to produce more cotton.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abraham Lincoln and Civil War America: A Biography is a great educational book of the life of our sixteenth president. It begins with his life as a young boy, soon developing into his life as a grown man. He was brought up as a pioneer kid who was normally anticipated that would deal with the ranch, however, then again, he rather detested it and attempted his best to read books at whatever point conceivable to teach himself, and soon developed into an extraordinary government official. He adhered to his ethics, and with his bravery helped end slavery In the book Abraham Lincoln and Civil War America, historian and professor William Gienapp gives an amazing history of one the most loved President in United States history.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays