The Inevitability Of The Civil War

Improved Essays
The Civil War was an inevitable incident. For decades, the North and South had been splitting apart due to their differing economies, beliefs regarding slavery, and political views, including states ' rights. While there were efforts to resolve the issues, primarily the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850, these were failed endeavors and did not stop the forthcoming events.

The South had an economy that heavily relied on agriculture as the primary form of income while the North was becoming an industrial society. With Eli Whitney 's invention of the cotton gin in the early 1790s, many plantations in the South essentially made the switch to produce more cotton. Since there was an increased demand in cotton, the plantation
…show more content…
As the North and South argued over slavery 's expansion into the new territories, the issue of states ' rights arose. While those in the North believed that the federal government should become stronger, those in the South argued for a weak federal government and state rights, as evidenced by the gaining of popular sovereignty in the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Other political aspects, particularly events in the Supreme Court, were also essential to the advancement of the approaching Civil War. One such event was the Supreme Court case of Scott v. Sandford, in which the Supreme Court ruled that a slave named Dred Scott should not be free. The Chief Justice at the time, Taney, ruled that Negroes were not United States citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court. He also stated that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because slaves were property and according to the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, Congress was not allowed to restrain citizens from their property. Another particular event was the 1860 presidential election. When Abraham Lincoln was elected president, the South feared that he would completely abolish slavery in all states. In the wake of this, the Southern States each issued an Ordinance of Secession, officially removing themselves from the Union. This led to the battle of Fort Sumter and the start of Civil

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unlike the North, Southern states did not industrialize and remained primarily rural. The North and the South started to become very different when Elie Wiesel invented the cotton gin. The cotton gin could work as fast as 50 people working by hand. Since cotton could be processed more easily, Southern planters wanted to grow more cotton on fields. White landowners that started a business selling cotton depended on slave labor to plant and pick cotton.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, the Dred Scott decision empowered proslavery Southerners. The 1854 Dred Scott v. Standford case was brought all the way to Supreme Court and was regarding a slave who lived in an area illegal to slavery because of the Missouri Compromise and was suing Standford for freedom (Brands 2015, 323). This case caused controversy; Firstly, because slaves could not be citizens at the time therefore they should not be allowed to sue a citizen.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Effects Of King Cotton

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After Eli Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin in 1793, cotton could be processed quickly and cheaply. As a result, more cotton was grown and more slaves were needed to work on more acres of cotton fields. This was an unintended consequence for Whitney, who sought to reduce the need for slave labor, although his invention had the opposite effect. The spread of “King Cotton” impacted the Southern way of life politically, economically, and socially. It contributed to a political divide between the North and the South over the issue of slavery, the expansion of the plantation economy in the South, and the often inhumane treatment of slaves.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cotton was a crop planted in the South but was not a cash crop like tobacco, rice, and indigo. It was difficult to harvest and it became more difficult as slave use declined. Eli Whitney, an inventor and graduate from Yale University, saw an opportunity in cotton despite its inability to produce much profit. Whitney’s invention of the cotton gin in 1793, while lessening the amount of labor needed to harvest cotton, led to the increase in slavery and harsher conditions for slaves. Slavery began decreasing after the Constitution, written in 1787.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks, slaves as well as free, were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories (McPherson). The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free states of Illinois and Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of winning his freedom. Scott traveled with his master, John Emerson, an army surgeon who was often transferred.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1. What are some of the long-term causes of the American Civil War (1800s-1850s)? Please give at least 2 examples. The American Civil War was driven by long-term causes and short-term causes.…

    • 3821 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Cotton became the main crop produced in the South and transformed slavery…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery has been one of the most talked about subjects in history. It is a significantly important in our history. The Antebellum period was known for many reform movements. Slavery supported the economy of the United States, the nation went from underdeveloped farmers to becoming a driving force financially. It influenced important leaders, which eventually lead to war.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The war was destined to take place unless one side decided to back down from the other, which was not going to happen due to the presence of hardliners in both the North and the South. The only way to avoid Civil War was to abolish slavery, the South was not going to let that happen without a fight. They needed slaves in their society and were more than established in their ways. Needless to say, the South did not give up their position on the institution of slavery and they had good reason not to. The Southern economy was basically one of agriculture and the slave population was a very important component to their development.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery is an important aspect of American history; it has shaped our country into what it is today. The civil war took place from 1861-1865. Without slavery, the civil war would not have occurred. Slavery divided the north and south, the differing opinions on things especially slavery is what led to the American civil war. The south expressed how slavery was beneficial for the whole nation because everyone depended on the southern economy and slavery was key to the prosperity of our nation.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter in “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement” tries to explain why civil wars are never ended with a peaceful settlement and fought until one side beats the other. This is because there are problems of enforcement and vulnerability; both sides prefer to fight instead of cooperate because it leaves them vulnerable (Walter compares this exchange with the Prisoner’s Dilemma situation). Unlike interstate wars, making cheating not favorable is difficult; either side cannot withhold resources or build military defenses without triggering a response from the other side and there is no neutral force or government to enforce peace. According to Walter, there are two ways to solve this issue: design power-sharing institutions involving both…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secession Essay

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the Northern states and the Southern states had their differences in their beliefs, on profuse occasions—specifically on slavery—compromises had squelch down the bad blood between them. However, in 1789, even after the Constitution was adopted by all of the States to amalgamate as a nation, for more than thirty years, the temporarily ceased frictions between the North and South went to and fro once more. Thus, by 1861, these opposing ideals between the disputants were so prodigious that the compromises do not seem enticing to either antithetical stance. Henceforth, this led to the secession of the Southern states, much to the Northern states’ disgust and eventually to the Civil War.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to determine if the Civil War was inevitable, we must first look at what the root cause of the Civil War was. The states seceded from the Union, because they had originally been free and were self governing. Since the federal government started to take powers away from the states, relations between the Southern states and the federal government started to become hostile. Had the federal government allowed the states to be self governing, there would not have been a Civil War, but since the federal government continued to trample on the states rights, they felt they had no choice but to secede. After the colonists fought for their freedom from a tyrannical overarching government, they were free…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays