Marisa Bugarin
Professor Bivona
ENG 102 3:00-4:15
3/16/15
Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliography
1) Chemaly, Soraya. "A Million Peeping Toms: When Hacking Is Also A Hate Crime." Time.Com (2014): 1. Academic Search Premier. Web. 24 Feb. 2015. http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=14&sid=59fa9ad9-2c8c-4d6d-9ad4-14cae4591c9d%40sessionmgr4003&hid=128&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=98905897
Soraya Chemaly, a media critic and activist for Time, writes about how hacking is a hate crime. The majority of the celebrity hackings in 2014 were women and there hasn’t been a discussion in terms of gender-based hate, and why there aren’t pictures of men involved in the hackings. Chemaly argues that the …show more content…
These celebrities support the allegation of how this action was very illegal and that these pictures were not meant to be reposted. To show how supportive these celebrities were, Marcus posted screenshots of Twitter posts from these celebrities stating how the privacy of these women was violated. Celebrities who were part of the nude photo hacks made some of these Twitter posts. It is true that these women had a right to take these kinds of pictures because it came from their own cameras or smartphones, but the people who posted this pictures had no right to post them online because that is considered stealing, as did some celebrities state in their Tweets. Comments such as “Don’t take nude photos if you don’t want them leaked” (Marcus) was said to be an invalid argument because it didn’t matter if they took the pictures or not. What was important is that these kinds of slurs shouldn’t be targeted towards women who had a right to their own privacy. This Huffington Post article provides support for my research question because it provides opinions and original posts from journalists around the world. Using The Huffington Post supports and confirms the research I’m still learning …show more content…
Lydia Warren of MAILONLINE wrote an article on how the ex-boyfriend of a well-respected California high school teacher sent private nude photos of the teacher to hundreds of students and faculty members to the school the teacher was teaching at. The livid ex-boyfriend sent the nude photos as an act of revenge because their relationship was called to an end. This confirms my research on the mental and emotional element of why people sought out judgmental comments. This was an act of revenge and it can happen to about anyone. Warren states that the teacher is so respected at the school that there was a petition to “Save Mr. Rosa” (Warren) because everyone saw that this was a hate crime. One does not have to be a celebrity or a female for their nude photos to be shown publicly. The reactions of the society in Rosa’s environment were in his favor because he was a “good person” (Warren). Society’s perceptions of whether the person is good or bad reflects on their reactions to the
Professor Bivona
ENG 102 3:00-4:15
3/16/15
Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliography
1) Chemaly, Soraya. "A Million Peeping Toms: When Hacking Is Also A Hate Crime." Time.Com (2014): 1. Academic Search Premier. Web. 24 Feb. 2015. http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=14&sid=59fa9ad9-2c8c-4d6d-9ad4-14cae4591c9d%40sessionmgr4003&hid=128&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=98905897
Soraya Chemaly, a media critic and activist for Time, writes about how hacking is a hate crime. The majority of the celebrity hackings in 2014 were women and there hasn’t been a discussion in terms of gender-based hate, and why there aren’t pictures of men involved in the hackings. Chemaly argues that the …show more content…
These celebrities support the allegation of how this action was very illegal and that these pictures were not meant to be reposted. To show how supportive these celebrities were, Marcus posted screenshots of Twitter posts from these celebrities stating how the privacy of these women was violated. Celebrities who were part of the nude photo hacks made some of these Twitter posts. It is true that these women had a right to take these kinds of pictures because it came from their own cameras or smartphones, but the people who posted this pictures had no right to post them online because that is considered stealing, as did some celebrities state in their Tweets. Comments such as “Don’t take nude photos if you don’t want them leaked” (Marcus) was said to be an invalid argument because it didn’t matter if they took the pictures or not. What was important is that these kinds of slurs shouldn’t be targeted towards women who had a right to their own privacy. This Huffington Post article provides support for my research question because it provides opinions and original posts from journalists around the world. Using The Huffington Post supports and confirms the research I’m still learning …show more content…
Lydia Warren of MAILONLINE wrote an article on how the ex-boyfriend of a well-respected California high school teacher sent private nude photos of the teacher to hundreds of students and faculty members to the school the teacher was teaching at. The livid ex-boyfriend sent the nude photos as an act of revenge because their relationship was called to an end. This confirms my research on the mental and emotional element of why people sought out judgmental comments. This was an act of revenge and it can happen to about anyone. Warren states that the teacher is so respected at the school that there was a petition to “Save Mr. Rosa” (Warren) because everyone saw that this was a hate crime. One does not have to be a celebrity or a female for their nude photos to be shown publicly. The reactions of the society in Rosa’s environment were in his favor because he was a “good person” (Warren). Society’s perceptions of whether the person is good or bad reflects on their reactions to the