In real life, each one of the tyrants has their own minions. In Animal Farm, a political fiction story and cautionary tale written by George Orwell, the pigs were manipulated to be the rulers of Animal Farm. On the same time, the book Animal Farm is an allegory to the Russian Revolutionary of 1917. Animal Farm, or what was called Manor Farm, represents Russia. Mr. Jones, the owner of Manor Farm, appears as Czar Nicholas II because both were overthrown by their citizens. While Napoleon, a pig that rules Animal Farm after Old Major, is shown as Joseph Stalin, the second leader of the Soviet Union, because both made a successful communities but using the Great Terror, murdering all opponents of Stalin. Snowball, a clever pig who challenges Napoleon
…show more content…
Napoleon is a tyrant and his minion is Squealer. All of Napoleon’s decisions were clarified by Squealer. Even when Napoleon’s selection would affect the animals negatively, Squealer could manipulate the animals why it was positive. Squealer gave no chance for the animals to think about Napoleon’s choices. Squealer appears plenteous of times when he gives an inaccurate explanations of Napoleon’s decisions. A specific example about Squealer’s false explanations is when Napoleon and the pigs took the milk and apples, and here the beginning of metamorphosis starts to …show more content…
Squealer knows that the animals in the farm are not educated, and they are unintelligent. Squealer turns the unpleasant facts and realities to positive lies. The way Squealer manipulate the animals was always persuasive, and that is what allowed the pigs morphing into humans. Squealer is a clever pig that could change any unacceptable situation to be a lie informing the animals that the action and decision that was done by the pigs is for the animals own benefit. Squealer is the most effective way to persuade the animals to complete Napoleon’s commands “He]Squealer[ was a brilliant talker, and when he was arguing some difficult point he had a way of skipping from side to side and whisking his tail which was somehow very persuasive. The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white.”(page 16) Squealer knew what is the right form to persuade the animals to not protest. Squealer could produce a solution to every impossible problem. Napoleon always leaves the explanations part to Squealer. Also, this can conclude that Squealer is a sycophant of Napoleon, because Squealer could turn all of Napoleon’s decisions to be against him. Squealer could persuade the animals to follow him instead of following Napoleon. Squealer must of done his explanations for a purpose. If Napoleon did not give
Napoleon is a tyrant and his minion is Squealer. All of Napoleon’s decisions were clarified by Squealer. Even when Napoleon’s selection would affect the animals negatively, Squealer could manipulate the animals why it was positive. Squealer gave no chance for the animals to think about Napoleon’s choices. Squealer appears plenteous of times when he gives an inaccurate explanations of Napoleon’s decisions. A specific example about Squealer’s false explanations is when Napoleon and the pigs took the milk and apples, and here the beginning of metamorphosis starts to …show more content…
Squealer knows that the animals in the farm are not educated, and they are unintelligent. Squealer turns the unpleasant facts and realities to positive lies. The way Squealer manipulate the animals was always persuasive, and that is what allowed the pigs morphing into humans. Squealer is a clever pig that could change any unacceptable situation to be a lie informing the animals that the action and decision that was done by the pigs is for the animals own benefit. Squealer is the most effective way to persuade the animals to complete Napoleon’s commands “He]Squealer[ was a brilliant talker, and when he was arguing some difficult point he had a way of skipping from side to side and whisking his tail which was somehow very persuasive. The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white.”(page 16) Squealer knew what is the right form to persuade the animals to not protest. Squealer could produce a solution to every impossible problem. Napoleon always leaves the explanations part to Squealer. Also, this can conclude that Squealer is a sycophant of Napoleon, because Squealer could turn all of Napoleon’s decisions to be against him. Squealer could persuade the animals to follow him instead of following Napoleon. Squealer must of done his explanations for a purpose. If Napoleon did not give