Animal Farm Rhetorical Language Essay

Improved Essays
Why is it so easy to convince people just by using rhetoric language, or propaganda? In the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell, the animals rebelled against Mr. Jones, at first to create an equal society, but slowly the pigs started to gain power, using propaganda and rhetoric language, especially napoleon and squealer. They turned the perfect, equal society into an unequal society, almost coming back to the point when Mr. Jones was here, just with a different leader. The pigs become like humans, drinking alcohol, and change the commandments to “some animals are more equal than other”. I think that Squealer is a very important character in the novel, and that without him, Napoleon and the other pigs wouldn’t have gotten all those privileges.

In Animal Farm, Napoleon is a dictator, but without the great help of Squealer and his talking skills, using rhetorical language, Napoleon would probably have been overthrown. Multiple times, like when Boxer was brought
…show more content…
In chapter 3, the pigs start to take all the milk and apples. Some animals complain, but once again, Squealer comes in and tells them lies to calm them. “‘Comrades!’ he cried. ‘You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege? Many of us actually dislike milk and apples. I dislike them myself. Our sole object in taking these things is to preserve our health. Milk and apples (this has been proved by Science, comrades) contain substances absolutely necessary to the wellbeing of a pig.’”(chapter 3). In this quote, Squealer not only says that the pigs need these apples and that milk, but also that it’s not their pleasure. Here, Squealer turns all the opinions of the animals the other way, making them think it’s not a privilege, but a miss fortune. That is why, again, I think that Squealer is very important in the role of power take over, and that without the pigs might not have had all these

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Similarly, Squealer’s use of pathos, reinforced by logical backing, is most convincing in constructing an argument to validate the pigs’ use of the farmhouse beds. Supporting this through the use of figures of speech such as rhetorical questions, diction, and parallel structure, he effectively alters the animals’ perceptions and revises their understanding of the past to consolidate the pigs’ authority. As in the milk and apples speech, Squealer uses pathos, appealing to the animals’ sense of identity, by referring to them as “comrades” which he repeats throughout his address. Moreover, Squealer begins by stating that the animals know the pigs “sleep in the beds of the farmhouse” and asks “why not.” In doing so, Squealer puts forth the argument…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "The animals were not certain what the word meant, but Squealer spoke so persuasively and the dogs who happened to be with him growled so threateningly, that they accepted his explanation without further questions." (58) This quote from the novella shows how Napoleon uses the dogs, the representation of the KGB, and the pig Squealer as propaganda in order for the farm animals to accept his decisions for the farm. "When they had finished their confession, the dogs promptly tore their throats out, and in a terrible voice Napoleon demanded whether any other animals had anything to confess." (84)…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orwell clearly exposes the reader to the manipulative power of language as they are constantly witnessing the abuse of language in arguments conducted by Squealer to manipulate the animals throughout the novel. Squealer uses the metaphor “ to justifying to the other animals why the pigs are getting the milk and apples even though they are in a shortage of food which is also an allusion to the Russian famine of 1921. This is furthered by Squealer who is an allusion to the Russian press, “ the pigs gradually twist and distort the values of a socialist revolution to justify their own corrupt behaviour and leaving the other animals oblivious to the pigs’ ulterior motives. They use appeals to patriotism, “ ” to halt and or cease any rebellion amongst the animals because the opposition would be seen opposed to the ideals of animalism. Thus we can see that the pig’s abuse of language contributed to their abuse of power.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relentless. Diligent. Powerful. Depicting his work ethic and attitude, these three adjectives analyze Boxer in George Orwell’s allegory. In the allegory, a story with a deeper meaning, Boxer symbolizes the working class during the Russian Revolution in 1917.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a.) Orwell’s Animal Farm is in allegory since it tells the Russian Revolution through a story using animals. For example, Mr. and Mrs. Jones represent Czar Nicholas II since the got overthrown out of power. The animals were basically taking over the farm. Additionally, the pigs represent the Soviet Intelligentsia since, they took control and were basically the high class of critiques and leaders.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin with, Squealer uses manipulative language, he claims that the pigs have been eating the milk and apples to maintain health when that is not the case. Squealer tells his audience,”milk and apples contain substances absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig,” to justify the pigs actions (Orwell ). This event portrays persuasion because Squealer deceives the animals by insisting that the pigs are only doing this for the benefit of everyone and not because they enjoy the food. In other words, Squealer denies the fact that the pigs do indeed enjoy having milk and apples and also fails to address that the pigs do have more privileges than the others do. Next, one day the animals discover that the milk and apples have gone missing because…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Squealer the Pig In the book Animal Farm, Squealer is a brilliant talker, persuasive, and manipulative to the animals and is the one to go to when needed by Napoleon. Squealer is a brilliant talker on the farm. He has a way of speaking to the animals that get them to believe the truth, from this passage from the book “When he was arguing some difficult point he had a way of skipping from side to side and whisking his tail which was somehow very persuasive” (Orwell 16). What this quotation means is when Squealer speaks it does not matter how difficult the question or anything that has to do with that matter, he will still have a counter argument that is an outstanding answer.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He often twists stories around to make Napoleon seem like a hero. If Napoleon ever does something that the other animals do not like, all it takes is Squealer to convince them that Napoleon is doing the right thing. The animals accept everything that Squealer tells them without trying to make their own mind up. The first example in the book of this is when the animals find out that the milk and apples are being consumed by the pigs, and Squealer tells his comrades, “You do not imagine, I hope, that we pigs are doing this in a spirit of selfishness and privilege? . . . Milk and apples contain substances absolutely necessary to the well-being of a pig . . .…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This large excerpt of the novel is full of dishonesty and persuasiveness, since Orwell creates Squealer as a very persuasive, aware character, as he knows exactly what he is doing, and what will be the outcome from his actions. Squealer states that the pigs are not indulging out of selfishness and privilege (which they are), he himself dislikes milk and apples, and gives examples that are supposedly backed up by scientific evidence regarding why the pigs need the nutrition supplied by milk and apples. By doing so, Squealer is providing falsehoods for persuasion out of the pigs’ selfishness to convince the animals that by giving up what is rightfully theirs, they are doing the right thing for the development of the farm. To conclude his statement,…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The pigs use rhetoric to convince the animals to adopt Napoleon as their leader and remain loyal to him. The animals on the farm spend their lives being a slave to the farm. Napoleon, however, abuses the animals loyalty, and even though they spend every day of their lives trying to please him, they are never good enough for Napoleon. They are constantly reminded that “Bravery is not enough... loyalty and obedience are more important” (55). After the deadly battle that allowed Animal Farm to be a free state, Squealer, Napoleon’s messenger, convinces the farm animals that their bravery in the battle was not enough.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal farm was a book about the Russian that used both language and literacy to establish a dictatorship between the animals. In the beginning a the pigs learned how to read and write so they wrote on the barn the rules of animal farm, but as things progressed, the dictator Napoleon himself made the pigs change the rules at night so the animals wouldn’t find out what their doing. If the all the animals were literate they would have realized that the rules were being changed to benefit the pigs especially Napoleon, who started to become the dictator. Squealer was one of the pigs who followed Napoleon and spreaded his propaganda through language. Squealer basically is mistreating his power by abusing language If the animals could realize…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book we have a fake martyr. Napoleon gives his people the false sense that he is putting in the most work out of all the animals And squealer is helping convince them. He tells them that he is worried about the future of the animal farm and everything he does is for the farm. He pretends to be this selfless being. When in fact anything he does, he does for his personal benefits.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During severe conflict, what is the effect when societies experience misery? You can either suffer or take advantage of the challenge. Some answer the call, whereas the others step up, dressing in national colors and chanting patriotic slogans. Some see violence as the right path to power instead of civilizing disagreements in a peaceful manner. The first step to identify someone who sees violence as the best option, is coming to realization that the person is mean-spirited, aggressive, and doesn't take other people's thoughts or opinions into consideration.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Orwell utilizes rhetoric appeals throughout the entire story; however, the best character to demonstrate this is Squealer. The character’s name fits the pig perfectly, not because of the sound the pig makes, but because Squealer…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through creating fear within the animals Squealer was able to make the animals abide by what he was saying, creating a very unsettling and fearful atmosphere for the animals to live in this can be seen through the continuous repetition of this phrase "Surely there is no one among you who wants to see Jones come back" (Orwell, 23). This phrase allows Squealer to be able to quickly grasp the attention of the animals since this is the utmost worst scenario that the animals would want to be in. For this reason, whenever Squealer mentions this phrase the animals give into whatever Squealer is…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays