Alexander The Great And Persuasion Essay

Improved Essays
The Campaigns of Alexander the Great by Arrian is easily comparable to The Funeral Oration of Pericles by Thucydides since these two primary sources exemplify the maximum power of the pre-Roman leaders in antiquity. Alexander the Great and Pericles both had complete authority and admiration of their men, but both likewise encountered troubling periods amongst their men. In the case of Alexander, his kinsmen were far from home, and were questioning why they persisted to fight under, and with, Alexander. Pericles’s people doubted anything they might accomplish about the war in Peloponnese. Throughout their speeches, they possessed the aptitude to persuade. However, Persuasion is the weapon of the orator as the sword is the weapon of the warrior, …show more content…
Speaking to some soldiers, a lot of widows, and a multitude of citizens is the context of Pericles, but Alexander the Great address solely soldiers. Speaking exclusively about the history of Athens, Pericles declares “Our institutions do not emulate the law of others. We do not copy our neighbors: rather, we are an example to them.” This differs from how Alexander reflects on the past since he says, “…he [Phillip]taught you to fight on equal terms with the enemy on your borders, till you knew your safety lay not, as once, in your mountain strongholds, but in your own valor. He made you city-dwellers; he brought you law; he civilized you.” Alexander’s speech reaching into the past, about his father, was a far more generalized speech as his soldiers were men from all over Macedonia, Peloponnese, Greece, Persian, and all of the known world at the time. It was a beautiful tactic as these men did not share the same background not did these men share the same ancestors. Pericles had a very specific history of the Athenian city-state. This speech was also quite impressive because he was addressing the people of Athens specifically so it was intelligent to focus on their specific history. These two men beautifully crafted speeches that catered to their people, warriors or citizens. Furthermore, these speeches, uttered by great, powerful leaders, were fine tuned for a specific goal, and this goal was to regain the trust of his people. It seems that they each gained the trust of their people as the people of Athens continued to fight the martial city-state of Sparta for years to come, and Alexander’s warriors flocked to him after he made the Persian commanders his kinsmen. When in a place of certain failure, these two men were able to regain the respect, faith, and admiration of their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hektor truly is a man of high moral standards because of his feeling of liability and fidelity towards his city-state, Troy, and his continued humbleness through his victories. Achilleus and Agamemnon both become increasingly arrogant when they are bestowed traditional Greek honor, but Hektor continually shows gratitude and grace no matter the amount of honor he receives because of his fierce and noble fighting. All three of the characters Homer’s Iliad show honor, but all show differing levels of true honor. Anyone can have honor, but only those who are truly virtuous and continually demonstrate the extent of their ethics can attain true…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexander The Greatness

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    So extraordinary was the effect of this action that the water wasted by Alexander was as good as a drink for every man in the army. I cannot praise this act too highly; it was a proof, if anything was, not only of his power of endurance, but also of his genius for leadership. The willingness of Alexander to fight and suffer alongside his men makes him stand out as a remarkable leader in my mind, and thus I concur with Arrian’s assessment of the greatness of Alexander. Although Arrian does find fault with some of Alexander’s decisions at times, overall the perspective of the book is exceedingly favorable. The 2004 movie, Alexander, is an Oliver Stone production that looks at the life and times of Alexander the Great from his childhood in Macedonia until his untimely death in Babylon at the age of 32, giving a brief look at his early education with the Greek philosopher Aristotle, his training in Greco-Roman wrestling, and his aptitude for horseback riding.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A great deal of respect was earned through success in battle, and was equated to a man’s ability to lead in government. Prominent figures like Pompey and Caesar were so successful because of the abilities they showed early in their careers. Augustus did not immediately establish himself as a threat during the battles against Caesar’s assassins. In fact, when he and Antony led their army against Brutus and Cassius in 42 BC, Augustus “disgraced himself in the first of the two actions by taking to his tent with illness” (Potter 172). Surely, if this weakness…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Rome achieved a very powerful and successful army when Julius Caesar led it. Caesar was a conqueror his heart wanted nothing more than to win. The crown was offered to him in front of a large crowd but Caesar refused it three times (Foreman 41). Caesar’s joy for politics came from his father-in-law, Cinna (Abbott 64). Caesar was a great leader due to his tactics during war, because of his honor and loyalty that he has given his army and family, and his demonstration of his strategies before war.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar transformed Rome from a growing empire into a mighty empire. Throughout many battles, many affairs and many risks, Caesar became one of the most feared leaders in history. He had other leaders running away from him or trying to take him down for many years, and no foreign leaders accomplished their goal. Caesar was not only strong in a military sense, he was one of the smartest leaders as well. Julius Caesar was a successful leader because he knew how to manage his power and popularity, he handled foreign policy very well, and he knew how to show his strengths.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Thesis

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although he was advised otherwise ambitious Alexander marched to Greece and surprisingly made easy work of them. Greece quickly surrendered and promised peace (Stewart, 37). Now with the support of his people and Greece, Alexander’s next move was to fulfill his father’s goal by conquering Persia. However, prior to that he needed to control his northern borders by conquering the Thracian Triballians. The Northern enemy put up more of a fight then Greece but was still beat by King Alexander quickly(Wihelm, 40) Alexander now had Macedon’s trust and they supported him as their king completely.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, he had incredible morale in Sparta. Even today, he is remembered as a legend because he used bold actions to stand up to a tyrant, and after his death, the Greeks combined forces to defeat King Xerxes. Leadership is an essential part of life because that is the only way humanity…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This civil war was the battle of the ages, between two powerful generals, each with their own army. Caesar’s military skill outmatched that of Pompey’s, having his army praise him for their success at Gaul, and for their rewards after the War. Pompey had always failed to come through on his promises to his army, lowering their respect for him. Pompey quickly decided to abandon Italy to Caesar…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this speech he used words like arbiters, which shows higher vocabulary. He uses formal language in discussing a pact with Achilles In conclusion, Hector is not an epic Hero. He has the physical strength being Troy’s greatest warrior, and the knowledge to strategies and try to deceive people with his words. However he lacks in having a heart to fight for good and justice, which is something all epic heroes need. Beowulf Beowulf was someone people trusted and was well respected, who became the king.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Napoleon success and great leadership came about because he was power hungry, loved fame, arrived at a time when no one expected him, and for the reason that he was able to control two things that Clausewitz the greatest writer on the nature of war defines success in battle 1) Mutual transformation of forces in conflict and 2) keeping in control. His national background together with his upbringing affected him as a leader. Though in addition to his nature, and focus as a leader part of his success was due to his military career that without most probably would not have allowed him to be the leader that he was. • King David- A leader with charisma like no other. Today, over 2,000 years later King David is still revered around the world regardless of religion.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays