Alexander The Great Dbq

Improved Essays
Once Alexander III of Macedonia’s father died, he inherited his throne and took over his empire at the age of twenty. Following in his father’s footsteps, he controlled a vast area of land, from Greece to Egypt extending to the Hindu Kush Mountains. Alexander did conquer over 3,000 miles of land, which is absurd, but his ruthless and sadistic manner doesn’t deserve the honoring title of “great”. Alexander was so power hungry, that his actions became deadly. He would pilfer every town and eradicate any obstacle in his quest for victory. Alexander showed no mercy to innocent people, or even his own men. Although history has credited Alexander the “great” with building the largest empire the ancient world has ever seen, few realize his cruel, …show more content…
According to Document A titled Alexander’s Empire, written by various sources, it shows the reader how disorderly Alexander traveled. He didn’t have a map, so Alexander and his men went to each town conquering one after the other not in any specific way. Alexander had no respect for these towns. At times, Alexander didn’t even know what he was conquering because he and his army were very disorganized on their journey with no strong regard of the outcome. Alexander and his men traveled east and west, in many circles, through mountains and deserts, just too takeover random cities. On the map of Alexander’s Empire, there is evidence that they got lost a few times as well. From Persepolis to Babylon, at Bucephala Nicaea, by Alexandria and the Hindu Kush Mountains, they had to turn around. It took Alexander about a eleven years to control from Macedonia to India. It was a short process for them to demolish the towns and then kill multiple innocent people. He would crucify the men and put the children and women into slavery. Once Alexander claimed the territory his, they would then move on to their next destination and leave the town with nothing, not even a ruler(which would end up being a part of his empire’s fall). Alexander continued to use this process with 70 more cities that he took over. Alexander and his men were also proven to be disorganized and chaotic in Document E, Alexander’s Legacy, written by many sources. It states that it took about eleven years for Alexander to conquer all these territories. But, the empire stayed together for only ten years after his death. Meaning that once Alexander died on June 10, 323 BCE because of his excessive drinking and partying, his “great” empire, all collapsed quicker than it was built. Since Alexander pulverized all these cities and then just left with his men, the outcome was that the people had no leader

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Name: Maddie Swart Hour: 3 Alexander the Great Alexander The Great is a person that interests numerous historians. Alexander was born in Macedonia in the year 356 BCE and died in 323 BCE. Alexander wanted to conquer the world, and he started with the Middle East and Asia. Alexander led an army of about 40,000 troops across the land.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After Alexander's sudden death in 323BCE, Politically, the huge power which he created became unstable. Therefore, his military leaders…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You’re trotting through a field, it's been 10 long years of battling and hard work. As soon as your turning back your leader Alexander the Great dies. Alexander was born into a leadership family. He was born in 356 BCE, in a kingdom of northern Greece, Macedonia. While Alexander was younger his father King Philip, built the Macedonian empire stronger than before.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the background essay, it states “Alexander inherited his father's kingdom and set out with the army to conquer Persia” Consequently, Alexander took his leadership role and took action immediately to ensure success for both him and his kingdom. Leadership is undoubtedly one of the most important components in being a great leader, which is why Alexander is a great…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having conquered millions of square miles shows how determined at courageous Alexander was. 11 of Alexander’s cities were named Alexandria, but in total, Alexander founded 70 cities in the times that he inherited the empire to the time of his death (Doc E) . Although Alexander killed many people, sold people to slavery, killed animals, made his men travel long periods of time without water, and was selfish with his land, he has changed our history. Alexander the Great is the greatest because of his strong actions in the ancient times.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander of Macedon: A Great Leader Being the first person to conquer the Egyptian, Greek, and Persian empires in just over a decade was no walk in the park, and neither was integrating a culture into all of those empires nor attempting to unite them all. Alexander of Macedon was this man: he conquered the greatest empires, spread the Greek influence, and lead in a unique way with his inspiring character that he is famous for. Although he was not the ideal leader such as Plato’s idea of a philosopher-king, he was an ethical man who wanted his people content. His well-known title, “Alexander the Great,” was very appropriate for him: his fine character and social goals, his unique political leadership and strategic conquering, and his economic…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great was a villain who knew how to manipulate people into thinking he was the good guy. Alexander had his fair share of good guy moments but overall Alexander used the good side people saw to manipulate them into doing as he wanted. Due to Alexander’s violence and mistreat to the human race he is villain. When Alexander the Great conquered new land he usually treated the people and the land in a cruel and disrespectful manner.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    His cavalry rode down the Persian line as a gap opened between Darius’ and Bessus’ men (Wasson; Hickman). Alexander saw the gap and went for Darius (Langley, 19). If Alexander did not decide to go for Darius then the spread of Greek culture may not have occurred. He then threw a spear at Darius and it missed him by inches (Wasson). Darius then fled as well as many of his men (Hunter, 26-27; Hickman).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander kept pushing into Afghanistan and Northern India, he wanted to keep going, but his troops wouldn’t have it. (Williams) Alexander died of an early death when he went back to Babylon. He died after a night of drinking, he became ill and he developed a fever and he slipped into a coma, later died quietly. His empire did not last too long after his death, but his campaign created a permanent change.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his path to capturing much of the world he had been egotistical and self-centered. When he worked to move from place to place, Alexander expected people to obey his commands. According to the article “Alexander the Great “ For their stubborn resistance, the inhabitants of the city were slaughtered and the survivors sold into slavery.” This shows that Alexander cared very little for the people he conquered. He worked very to ruin their civilizations and their lives in general.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguably one of the greatest, if not the greatest military leader in the world was Alexander the Great. The man who with a powerful army swept through the ancient world and united an empire that would stretch from Europe to the middle east, northern Africa, and the edges of eastern Asia. With such a grand conquest one might wonder how this man united an empire in so short of time, but also who was this man I believe with a combination of aspects in his life such as being an exceptional military leader, able to understand culture of other civilization, confidence from his solders, and keeping city’s he found along his campaign to maintain peace, a man who would soon be called for the rest of history Alexander the great. Alexander…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The life and history of Alexander the Great, and the empire that he formed, has been studied by people ever since his death. Alexander’s empire ruled over a large portion of land from Greece in the west to India, in the east. His actions brought an end to the long standing conflict that the Persians and Greeks had with each other, established multiple cities that bore his name across the land that he conquered, had a major influence on future rulers, and had remnants that lasted until the time of the Roman Empire. Alexander not only had a prominent place in history, but he also contributed to advancements in military tactics of the ancient world. The life of Alexander had a far reaching effect on world history that lasted for centuries after his death, and the study of his life can help a person understand various facets of history that were inspired or influenced by his actions.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander liquidation of the Persian monarchy build opportunities fro Greek merchants, soldiers, engineers, ect, and those who obeyed him and his followers could attend in the new political unity based on the principles of the monarchy. Alexander’s followers used force to build military monarchies that controlled the Hellenistic world after his death. Autocratic energy became regular resources of those Hellenistic monarchies and was a part of Alexander’s political endowment. It’s quite evident that Alexander’s vision of an empire influenced the Roman who was the true brood of his legacy. Alexander didn’t just leave a new political view, but he also left a cultural legacy which developed the Greek language, art, architecture and literature which expanded throughout the Middle East.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Alexander was not satisfied with his empire, and wanted to conquer more areas besides the one he had currently. “ It took Alexander four more years to conquer the rest of the Persian Empire. Bactria, modern Afghanistan, proved especially difficult, but Alexander eventually won the allegiance of the natives by his bravery and magnanimity as well as by his marriage to a local princess named Roxanne…later he invaded India” (Kidner et.al,…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays