Act Utilitarianism: Dr. Brown

Improved Essays
Act Utilitarianism, is the moral theory that is reflective of Dr. Brown’s actions and perceptions. John Stuart Mill, whom is the creator of the theory, states that this theory requires thinking about the consequences of any given action, the use of the Hedonic Calculus, which is a guide that helps to make moral decisions and perceives happiness as only the intrinsic value (Collier & Haliburton, 2015 p. 6). Dr. Brown uses utilitarian approach in this situation in variety of ways. The use the Hedonic calculus, which looks at the sum of all values of happiness and unhappiness produced by an act is significant. Dr. Brown addresses the use of the hedonic calculus through the percentages of survival of the child. Despite having 30% rate of the child

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his piece, Utilitarianism, Integrity and Responsibility, Bernard Williams critiques utilitarianism by examining two examples through a utilitarian perspective. Based on his analysis, Williams claims that utilitarianism doesn’t allow for integrity because the agent is not only responsible for his actions, but for those of others as well. The first example focuses on George, an expert chemist, who can’t find a job due to his poor health. This causes strain on his wife and children. A colleague offers to use his influence to get George a job at a laboratory studying chemical and biological warfare.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Margaret Austin Professor Otto October 20, 2015 Guided Comparative Essay Ethics, the moral understanding that someone has a behavior towards. Utilitarian is the ethics of something that is right or wrong that is than assessed for a consequence. Bentham and Mill both have a different but similar opinion on utilitarianism. They both have the notion that utilitarianism is about the mind and body or the pain and pleasure we mankind endure.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Theory Of Utilitarianism. The moral theory of Utilitarianism is defined as to be that an action is only good only if it brings happiness to others. There are three sub principles that define the theory of Utilitarianism, Principle one talks about how consequences are all that matter in a situation or an action, that the final outcome/ results are those that matter. The second principle states that happiness is the only thing that matters and that we seek for pleasure more often and we hate to have pain.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The choice of an action is made by determining which choice will lead to the consequence with the most utility. Because it examines choices so closely, act utilitarianism applies to specific situations, as the consequences of an action can differ depending on the circumstances regarding a situation. The morally right act is therefore entirely dependent on the circumstances and not an outside rule or law. In order to best examine the consequences of an action, act utilitarianism considers the scope, duration, intensity, and probability an act will cause. The scope emphasizes how many individuals are affected by the action; the greater the number of individuals affected, the greater the scope.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical framework that correlates with this issue. Utilitarianism stands on the principle that no action is good or bad in itself. This means, all actions are consequence driven. If a person chooses to give noncitizens healthcare access, it is because the outcome of such an option brings about a good result. However, if the United States gives noncitizens rights to healthcare because that seems right, but there is no evidence of a beneficial outcome, then according to utilitarianism that is the wrong choice.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to this distinction, act and rule utilitarians have different responses to the two problems posed by Carritt. In response to the arctic explorers, act utilitarians would have a couple ways to defend utilitarianism. First, they could deny that the alleged consequences, the weakening of promises and justice, are genuine consequences. In order to do this, the act utilitarian would have to claim that an error was made in assessing the consequences. It is possible that not all the relevant consequences were considered, and that a true consideration of all consequences would result in different consequences where Carritt’s criticism would be irrelevant.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stealing to survive How would a utilitarian respond to the dilemma of stealing to survive? Utilitarianism is a normative theory and a teleological approach to morality. The theory states that motives do not matter and that the consequences are the only thing that should make you carry out an act. The foundation of utilitarianism is the Greatest Happiness Principle which has three sections.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Normative Ethical theory is the greatest majority of good actions is intended, as a morally right actions that produces the most good, for promoting the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people it affects in a hedonistic sense, by avoiding pain and suffering. The author of this theory is John Stuart Mill. The main purpose is determining what is the greatest good. Too often a child’s health and intellectual stimulation of natural development take a back seat in certain issues. Subsequently, how do we measure the value of a life?…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Perspective

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The utilitarian perspective considers the usefulness of an action by judging the utility of that action on whether it helps increase the common good. The phrase “The end justifies the means” is very common in describing this perspective because the end result is being judged rather than the morality of the act. In order made a decision based on a utilitarian perspective it first necessary to consider all courses of action before determining which one truly increases the common good the most. When interpreting the effect of an action of the common good it is important to consider each stakeholder that is affected by the action. A stakeholder is someone who incurs risk based on the action.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Camden is a city with an infamous reputation. Its people are often stigmatized as being dangerous, criminals and immoral. Because of its notoriety many avoid going there. If by chance they have a need to be there, most would take care of their business, get out of town and would not consider speaking with a stranger on the street. The biblical city of the Samaritans had a reputation similar to the City of Camden.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is one of the utmost common, uncomfortable and controversial topic. People throughout the world are pretty much forced to choose a side, but do not realize that there might be a difference between what we think about the law disposing abortion. With that being said, abortion can be portrayed as both morally wrong and permissible. Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham both document this in their theories and beliefs. Kant does this with his deontological theory which describes how morality should be focused on duties and adhere to rules and imperatives, and Bentham opposes this with utilitarianism views, which focuses on the consequences of an action.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays