Moral Theory Of Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
Moral Theory Of Utilitarianism.

The moral theory of Utilitarianism is defined as to be that an action is only good only if it brings happiness to others. There are three sub principles that define the theory of Utilitarianism, Principle one talks about how consequences are all that matter in a situation or an action, that the final outcome/ results are those that matter. The second principle states that happiness is the only thing that matters and that we seek for pleasure more often and we hate to have pain. Lastly talks about the third principle in how everyone involved must consider happiness to be given the same weight and equal consideration to animals a well. In this paper ill explain the three principles of utilitarianism; also
…show more content…
In a utilitarian mind you should always seek for happiness no matter what the cost is. I think that we aren’t build as humans just to be too conceded to only think about ourselves. In a scenario if you were given 20 billion dollars and to live alone with a dog or to continue living your normal life, the Utilitarian answer would be to take the 20 billion dollars because it would make you happy. As a human we basically cannot be happy without the relations we have built in life and having your love ones around you. Even though we are presented with absolute pleasure we still have our side of humanity where we think of the fact that sometimes we need to experience pain in order to be able to grow as a human being. How will you ever experience pain if everything is given to you in life? Being at your lowest point in life is what you need sometimes to be able to remember that you are human and that you can fight your way through tough times. Pain in life reminds us that pleasure isn’t the only thing that matters in life, it is how you make use of what you have is what matters. The third principle states that everyone involved in the action should be given equal consideration. An example would be if someone robs a bank and shot fires at people without killing anyone. In a utilitarian mind -set we should kill this person who didn’t kill anyone. …show more content…
Pleasure doesn’t bring happiness to everyone or actions of people do not just happen to make them happen. Everyone have a different life and meaning to their life. Some are chasing their dreams and trying to earn everything to get in life. Even though we avoid pain as humans sometimes pain is what we need in order to be stronger than before and to learn from our past and mistakes. All situations shouldn’t be considered equally because some people deserve to be heard and the reasons behind their actions. Prosecuting one for his actions in order to benefit others is not always the scenario in life. Killing a person will not be the justified thing to do because we do not know if he or she is innocent. So there is more to morality than just happiness or consequences in

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is based on the consequences resulting from actions. Moral actions solely rely on the resulting consequences. Pleasures vary regarding quality and quantity. However, utilitarianism theory gives the quality aspect an upper hand. “Human beings are not satisfied with pleasures they have because they consider them to be of low quality” (Rosen, 2005.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The entirety of the Star Wars sage hinges on its main theme of hope. The film, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, is no exception to the rule. The character Cassian Andor is an interesting figure in the film as his rationale for his actions in the Rebellion are based in hope, which would appear to be noble and good, but has lead him to make decisions that are morally gray. In think paper I shall argue that the moral framework that best describes that actions of Cassian Andor in Rogue One is through the lens of utilitarianism by John Stewart Mills and Jeremy Bentham. I shall explore how and why Cassian embodies this theory in his actions throughout the film, and I shall also compare him Chirrut Imwe and Jyn, who employ Soren Kierkegaard’s philosophies…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It does not rely on a higher power to determine what right or wrong but rather it relies on actual outcomes is. Utilitarianism also opposes egoism, or the pursuit of self-interest. Utilitarianism says that one should not consider just one’s self when…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evolutionary defence of the Epicurean’s argument that pleasure is the highest good My argument is that from the standpoint of evolution, hedonism is the most valid theory of the ‘good life’. The scope will be narrowed down to Quantitative Hedonism (Bentham, 1789), as there is only one kind of pleasure and its worth is measured on dimensions of intensity and duration. This essay will first lay out the importance of this view and its major positions which it stands for. After which, objections against Hedonism (from Aristotle and Cicero), and the Evolutionary perspective will be discussed.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, charity is one type of the utilitarianism. The government of Sierra Leone had been looked into the movement of Revolutionary United Front (RUF) for a several time. The government was intent to quell the rebellion led by the Revolutionary United Front (RUF). It is because the government of Sierra Leone believed that the action was acting the best interest to the large number of people.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is interesting because it takes primarily a consequentialist approach to ethic looking at the ends to something and looks at the pros or cons of an action, or what causes the most happiness versus the amount of generating pain from an action. Even though it sounds simple to compare the amount of happiness versus pain the equation that we have to use for utilitarianism does not always work the that it should and other flaws that we will go over in this essay taking an unusual stance on the matter, questioning the utility monster but also criticizes utilitarianism later but also saying that it is the best that we have currently have. The idea of a utility monster is not a valid objection against utilitarianism and can be worked…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stealing to survive How would a utilitarian respond to the dilemma of stealing to survive? Utilitarianism is a normative theory and a teleological approach to morality. The theory states that motives do not matter and that the consequences are the only thing that should make you carry out an act. The foundation of utilitarianism is the Greatest Happiness Principle which has three sections.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics Of Care Essay

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Humans thrive on the ability to make choices and have options. Choices allow for the greatest individuals benefit and ensures that we survive by making the best decisions for our well-being. Modern society has evolved in a way where we are no longer in constant danger for our lives, but instead, are looking for ways to thrive. Utilitarianism is a well-known moral theory that bases itself on the universal principle of utility which is described as “always acting in ways that maximize happiness and minimizing harm for the aggregate”. A theory such as Utilitarianism is very attractive and makes moral sense intuitively.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When first reading the experiment in regards to rescue I and rescues II, I did not like or want to make a choice, and really, I do not have to make a choice. My job is to tell you what Stuart Mill would do and what Immanuel Kant would do based on their philosophical views of utilitarianism and categorical imperatives respectfully. In Rescue I & II Mill. Utilitarianism is the basic principle to look at what is right and wrong. Depending on the consequences or the outcomes you can select the course of action not which is in your own best interest, but that which takes into account the best interest of others.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics Mini Case Study Hassan E. Hussein Metropolitan State University May 28, 2017 Ethics Core Ethical Beliefs An individual’s personal values play an important role in acting as a ground for differentiating between right and wrong, thus determining a person’s daily actions and emotions. Education and parents affect the development of people’s core ethical beliefs, such as responsibility, integrity, ambition, excellence, and family. It is noteworthy that a person’s core ethical beliefs are significant principles that unconsciously or consciously influence their ethical conduct and thinking (Head, 2006). In particular, these precepts play a critical role in shaping one’s ethical responses and have a capability to reflect…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Utilitarian and Deontological Discussion of Abortion Today, abortion has become a heavily debated topic whether socially or politically since the medical procedure was voted legal by the Supreme Court over 40 years ago. It is defined as the purposeful termination of a pregnancy before a normal childbirth (Abortion: Get Facts About the Procedure and Statistics). Whether you find yourself agreeing with it or not, many people have something to say. Abortion is very controversial because of the discussion whether or not a fetus is a person. Many wonder if there is a morally relevant point at some duration throughout the pregnancy or development of the fetus that could justify having an abortion or possibly not having an abortion.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an “act as to maximize or further pleasure for everyone.” Jeremy Bentham, a philosopher and creator of the Hedonic Calculus argues that there are only two masters when it comes to maximizing happiness, pleasure v.s. pain. However, according to his calculus whoever is receiving more pleasure than pain, by all means should continue the act, even if it is immoral. For example, if a sadist is torturing an innocent person and is receiving more pleasure than the innocent person is receiving pain then, according to Bentham it is okay for the sadist to continue because that would mean maximum happiness has been achieved. And the sole goal of Utilitarianism is to maximize pleasure for everyone.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays