Abraham Lincoln Cornerstone Address Analysis

Superior Essays
Abraham Lincoln the 16th president of the United States once stated, “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” Abraham Lincoln is a hero for the citizens of the United States of America because his determination and courage to ending slavery even if it meant. Slavery was the vital cause of the American Civil War. The civil war was between the northern and southern states. The northern states were called the union and the southern states were the confederacy/confederates. The north and the south both had their differences on how to run the country which created power struggle between the two. People in the North believed in unity and that slavery should …show more content…
Alexander Stephen who was the Vice President of the Confederacy encouraged the people of the South too take action for what they believed in. The speech done by Stephens was before the start of the war, and its purpose was to explain the reason for the succession, difference in ideologies, and to defend slavery. Alexander Stephens asserted that, “upon the great truth that the Negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition” (Stephens, 3). He believes that African ‘American people’s natural state is to be a slave.Throughout his speech, Stephen is essentially encouraging the people of the South to fight back for their rights that are being taken away by the North. Stephen believes that without fighting back, the North will just take away the rights of the South. Such speeches were common in the South, as politicians would try their best to make sure people in the South did not get influenced by the Republican Party. When an influential person like Stephen is encouraging the South to fight back, a war is inevitable. As the South starts to believe that the only way to keep slavery is to fight for …show more content…
Some states believed in slavery while others didn’t. “The United States Supreme Court decided one hundred and fifty years ago that slavery is morally lawful” (Suing for Freedom). The court’s decision was that slavery was allowed because slaves had no rights and would never be citizens of the country. This was a shameful situation because everyone should have the right to live their life however they want; which is why Dred Scott fought for his freedom. He was “a slave who sued for his freedom in Missouri after living in the free states of Illinois and Wisconsin” (Suring for Freedom). His battle for freedom ended up in the Supreme Court. This gave hopes to many other suffering just like he did. Scott kept on fighting for his rights even though the Missouri Compromise of 1820 strictly restricted the spread of slavery. Even though he didn’t receive his freedom, this opened eyes for many northerners. This allowed them to stand up for the slaves to give them the freedom they deserved. Northern abolitions that were trying to end slavery were outraged due to the court’s decision. “The resulting furor helped Abraham Lincoln win the presidency. Ultimately, it would take the Civil War and a constitutional amendment to end slavery. Scott didn 't live to see that day. But he did become a free man” (Suing for Freedom). The whole event led to the civil war. The

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Cornerstone Speech

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Alexander H. Stephens was known as the Vice President of Confederacy. As you know the Confederacy was a strong supporter of the idea of enslavement of Africans. They also believed that there was not any moral issues because they were not actual people. We today however know that this is completely incorrect. Alexander Stephens will eventually give a speech addressing the Confederate named the Cornerstone.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the most controversial cases in American History was the case of Dred Scott versus Sanford. Dred Scott was a slave who lived with his owner, Doctor John Emerson in the free state of Illinois. Dred Scott and his wife, Harriet, both had lived in a free state for a decade, and they decided to file for emancipation. Commonly, slaves would sue for their freedom if they had live in free territory for a long period of time. Their cases were not at first acknowledged because of the outbreak of cholera and backed up court schedules but eventually their case was heard, and the Scotts won favor.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karuna Kayastha Professor Mathew Hinckley History 1301 07/06/2017 Cornerstone Speech Cornerstone speech also known as "Cornerstone Address" is the speech given by Alexander Stephen in Savannah Georgia on March 21, 1861. During the Civil war , he served as the Vice President of Confederate States of America. When was elected to the Confederate Congress, he deliberated the speech that announced about new government where he said that all races are not equal and the whites are always superior then the black people. He believed and insisted that the American Revolution was based on the premises of wrong fundamental foundation.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As a Supreme Court justice who aided in the decision of the Dred Scott v. Sanford case, I was in favor of Dred Scott. My decision was based mainly on the fact that Dr. John Emerson moved Dred Scott to the state of Illinois and later to the state of Wisconsin. Slavery was prohibited in both Illinois and Wisconsin, which was indeed a fair argument for Dred Scott, being that he has lived in both states for a long period of time, even married his wife, Harriet Robinson in the free state of Wisconsin. After the death of Dr. Emerson, Scott and his family should have been considered.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dred Scott Court Cases

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Taney ruled that slave was not a citizen of the American so they had no right to bring their any disputes to the federal courts. Furthermore, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional because slave was personal property so Scott had never been free. The court also made a decision that the slavery could not be banned or deprived in the United State. All the decision to the Dred Scott case created a strong react for the American Public and antislavery groups because they feared that slavery would increase uncontrolled. These decision also damaged to the national unity especially the Northern and Southern.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott escaped slavery from the South just to face even bigger problems. He had the chance to argue his case in court, and was sent back to slavery because he was considered as “property.” This case also showed that the Union somewhat supported slavery at the time, not allowing Scott to go free. “Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” - Abraham Lincoln. According to the constitution, all men are created equal, and this case completely opposed…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that God is here to help and that everyone ‘pray(s) to the same God.’ Then he discusses how slaves are people and that it is an issue (and what may have caused the war). The North and South side were very different and both sides were comparable,…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Case Essay

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This looked to be just a simple case in which Scott should've been ruled a free man. However, it turned into one of the most controversial court cases ever. The motives for this ruling seemed to be that the courts wanted to defer the decision of slavery unto the states. It was a crucial case which in the southerner’s eyes decided the national…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2) As a slave and a black, he was not a citizen because at the time the constitution was written, blacks “had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order… so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” As such, Scott had no right to sue in Federal Court. 3) The provisions of the Act of 1820, known as the Missouri Compromise, were voided as a legislative act because the act exceeded the powers of Congress, insofar as it attempted to exclude slavery and impart freedom and citizenship to Black people in the northern part of the Louisiana cession. Scott’s stay in free territory did not make him free…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dred Scott though never gave up to obtain a freedom that he was seeking for and realistically knew it was not an easy challenge to overcome. The decision made by the case caused so many chaos and tension because it was a case that threatened the union. The decision “inflamed regional tension” (Dred Scott Decision) because if Dred was to win his case other slaves would join and file a case as well. The tension created among slaves was nevertheless for either good or the bad.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The states of the North had become anti-slavery and the states of the South became slavery supporters. This is a relation to sectionalism in the 1800s because as time went by, the North and the South began to encounter issues, such as losing supporters with the same views of slavery. As the issues became more violent, the separation of the two Cardinal…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many issues in slavery led to the Compromise of 1850 or otherwise the Fugitive Slave Act. The Fugitive Slave Act was written by Congress in 1850, the purpose was to solve problems about slavery. One of the many problems was to the undecided status of the state of California. The south wanted California to be a slave state, but the north was trying to stop the expansion of slavery. (Give me liberty).…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A Case Against Dred Scott

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On March 6, 1857, the Court delivered a 7-2 decision against Dred Scott. The majority held that Dread Scott was indeed a slave and not a citizen of the U.S., therefore, he could not file suit. The Court reasoned that any individual of African descent whether he or she is enslaved or a freeperson they are not American citizens under the US Constitution. Therefore, when the Constitution was written the intent of the framers was to exclude slaves as citizens. Thus, because the Constitution did not allow slaves to obtain citizenship, the Court found Dred Scott to be a slave and not a citizen, to take part in the judicial process, such as Dred Scott, an individual must have the diversity of citizenship.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abraham Lincoln is well-known for being one of the most successful presidents of all time. Because of the time period that he was president in, he was forced to deal with a very challenging issue: handling slavery and the civil war. Throughout Lincoln’s presidency, he delivered numerous speeches on the topic of slavery and tried his best to keep the United States together. Two of his most famous speeches came during his two inaugural addresses when he became president. Although his tone and purpose were different for each of his inaugural addresses, both conveyed similar ideas and used similar rhetorical devices.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays