The Pros And Cons Of The Fugitive Slave Act

Improved Essays
Many issues in slavery led to the Compromise of 1850 or otherwise the Fugitive Slave Act. The Fugitive Slave Act was written by Congress in 1850, the purpose was to solve problems about slavery. One of the many problems was to the undecided status of the state of California. The south wanted California to be a slave state, but the north was trying to stop the expansion of slavery. (Give me liberty). Eventually California became a free state, but Texas become a slave state and the United States would pay the debt of Texas’s independence. This act was intended for the slaves and slave owners of the south. The act was bias towards the south, because of the many advantages they gained. One gain for the south, was runaway slaves would have to be returned to their southern owners (Give Me liberty). Many northerns did not like this Fugitive Slave Act, because many thought this gave slavery the advantage of expanding (Historical Summary). The south took advantage of this act and would enslaved freemen as slaves An example is Solomon Northup, becoming a slave (Historical Summary). These are the reason why this act was bias towards the south and why the Civil War started. The city of Boston showed bias to the south and the Fugitive Slave Act. …show more content…
Calhoun. A state senator for South Carolina, which was a slave state. This speech was intended for people who disagreed with the Fugitive Slave Act. Calhoun described how the north thought slavery was a sin and inhumane. Many people of the north thought it was a crime and a threat. If the union abolished slavery, the south would be force to succeed to dissolve from the Union. He believed the Fugitive Slave Act needed to be enforced, because the North overpowered and outnumber the south. He thought it was important to keep this argument, it can go both ways and Calhoun tried his best to keep it towards the south. This could also cause the nation to split in two different

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Expansion Of Slavery

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a result, plantation owners began to think spreading the slaves out would decrease the rebellious atmosphere. The Kansas-Nebraska act stated that the Missouri Compromise had to be repealed because it did not give the southern portion of the United States enough or equal opportunity compared to the north. This act can be linked as one of the main factors in the creating of the civil war and national sectionalism amongst the north and the south. Sectional division in the Kansas and Nebraska territories began to boil over when anti-slavery sentiments dominated the land. People like Eli Turner wanted to ensure that slavery would not be spread beyond the south.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Northerners wanted to abolish it but Southerners on the other hand, strongly agreed to slavery. They felt that slavery was making America prosper, so why should they stop? The South was making money from selling cotton that the slaves picked but the people up North didn’t like the way slave owners were making money from African Americans being enslaved. When Abraham Lincoln became president, the South felt that their right being a slave state was in danger. Their differences on slavery caused the Civil War.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In effect, there were small-scale wars through these territories between pro-slave and abolitionist factions, which incited an increasingly militaristic view of a coming war. Southerners were concerned that abolitionists would sabotage new slave settlements in the west, which increased hostilities between the north and the South. In this manner, the rationale for a southern Confederacy became a more realistic goal, since the federal government was essentially making it a “first-come/first-serve” style of territorial expansion. This only encouraged a feeling of distrust of southerners for abolitionists, which galvanized a more aggressive militaristic position, especially in the context of secessionist ideology. Therefore, abolitionist sabotage and militarism was a primary catalyst for the southern secessionist movement, since it appeared that the northern federalist government was not willing to provide a means of balancing the issue of slave and free state sovereignty.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His election posed a threat to the people, whereby they felt that the government was overstepping their mandate by fighting for the rights of the slaves. The states did not like the way things were being run, and it was evident that Abraham Lincoln was anti-slavery; Lincoln favors the northern states views on slavery by giving them a chance. Southern states were opposed that Lincoln interests was to support their idea of having slaves, but instead Lincoln went against them. For this reason, these states lost confidence in him and decided to start their states which they could be ruled the best way they knew how by a government of their choice. Abraham Lincoln was against the expansion of the use of slaves, and this irritated the southern states because they were pro-slavery and could not do without the…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South wanted to secede from the Union because they believed that states had the right to decide whether or not slavery would be legal in their state (American Civil War). These state rights were the most significant rights that caused the Civil War. The North and South also had very different economies because of the types…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The south tried to say that slaves were happy, but educated, heartfelt attacks on slavery written by people like escaped-slave Frederick Douglass said otherwise. The treatment of slaves varied depending on the owner, but families of slaves being separated and punishments like whipping was common. Though the war may have started as a way to preserve the Union which was breaking after the election of an anti-slavery President, Abraham Lincoln, it turned into a war that would decide the fate of slavery (“Slavery in the United States” 2014). The desire for change is what caused the civil war. The people of the northern states recognized that slavery should not be legal while the southern states wanted to expand slavery to the west.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gary W. Gallagher didn’t believe that the war was over slavery but, that the war was over the Union. He provided solid evidence on why he believed that the Civil War was not over slavery but over the Union. I provided evidence also that joined Gary W. Gallagher that the war’s primary focus was the Union. The war was fought for the Union but, the Union attacked slavery because they knew that slavery was a dominant tool that the Confederates used. Moreover, if the war was fought over slavery then slavery would’ve ended when the war did not months after.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, Congress passed a law with an incentive and stricter regulations in order to keep abolitionists from helping the fugitives that were wanted in the South (“Fugitive Slave Acts”). Although, The stricter terms stated in the modified law only strengthened the resistance of the Abolitionists because of their frustration. Also, This Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 contributed to the tension between the North and the South causing the North to oppose the law and accuse Southern slaveowners of receiving more money from commissioners (“Fugitive Slave Acts”). Overall, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 led to many disputes and sparked many changes in abolitionist movements such as the Underground…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, after the Civil War, Southerner leaders, Neo-Confederates and some revisionists historians downplayed the importance of slavery as the main cause of the Civil War. Instead these critics have surmised that a multitude of causes centered around various social and economic sectional differences as well as state’s rights theories that eventually lead to war. Regardless of these claims, the preservation of slavery and white superiority are ultimately the underlying lynch pins at the core of these theories that economic, political or social differences were the causes of the Civil War. Moreover, to ensure Southern secession, Southern leaders protected this racially motivated system by spreading fear of racial equality, war between the races and amalgamation of the races at the hands of Northerners who opposed slavery. Southern leaders later deflected their attempts to maintain their race based social and economic hierarchy with theories of states’ rights and sectional differences after their defeat in the Civil…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fugitive Slave Act Essay

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The South was enraged about how the book described slavery and stated that it was inaccurate. The south was so opposed to the book that they banned its sales in the South. On the other hand, it was very successful in the north and rose attention the problem of slavery. Many people who were undecided on the issue saw reasoning to side with the abolitionists. This book was important because it strengthened the anti-slavery cause up in the North by showing the truth of slavery.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays