Abigail Fisher Case Summary

Improved Essays
In 1997, the Texas legislature enacted a law requiring all public universities in Texas to admit all high school seniors who ranked in the top ten percent of their high school’s graduating class. The University of Texas at Austin, after finding disparities between the racial and ethnic makeup of the university's undergraduate population and the state's population, decided to modify its race-neutral admissions policy. The new policy continued to admit all in-state students who graduated in the top ten percent of their high school classes, however, for the remainder of the in-state freshman class the university would consider race as a factor for admissions into the university.
The plaintiff, Abigail Fisher, a white female, applied for undergraduate admission to the University of Texas in 2008. Fisher was not in the top ten percent of her high school’s graduating class in Sugarland, Texas, so she competed for admission with other non-top ten percent in-state applicants. Fisher was denied admissions into The University of Texas at Austin.
Fisher filed suit against the
…show more content…
Also taking into consideration of both perspectives of the Fisher v. The University of Texas at Austin case, although in some ways she may have been an ideal candidate for admissions at The University of Texas in terms of extracurricular activities, however, her academic standing did not match the profile of the nationally rank public university. Therefore there is no proof that she was denied admissions due to her race. In fact, if you take a look at UT-Austin’s student profile for the fall of 2008, the White-Non-Hispanic enrollment rate was found to be 54.7%. As shown, the majority of the students enrolled in the university at the time of Fisher’s admissions were white, completely discounting her

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Sipuel v. Oklahoma, the ruling of the case proved that the southern states were starting to worry. Marshall took the case in defense of Ada Lois Sipuel, who was denied to Oklahoma Law School. The case went up to the Supreme Court and back down to Oklahoma high court “which ordered the University either to admit Miss Sipuel to the white law school or to open up a separate one for her…” The school in turn roped off a section of the school for black students. Marshall argued that the teachings she was receiving in a roped off area of the school were clearly not equal to the education the whites were receiving.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated above this case was brought to the United States District Court, Northern Division because the Plaintiff, Cindy A. Pilon, a Caucasian female applied for the Coordinator of Campus Recreation position at Saginaw Valley State University and was denied the position. The person who was rewarded the job was an African-American male. The plaintiff alleged reverse discrimination on January 7, 2003 and sued the university as well as the dean of the university, Richard P. Thompson. On march 10, 2003, the plaintiff amended her complaint, which now claims denial of equal protection of laws and discrimination on account of race in forming contracts; race discrimination against SVSU; and declaratory and injunctive relief against both defendants.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion I find that the Abigail N. Fisher has presented a good amount evidence proving that the University of Texas, Austin’s policy is unconstitutional based on their policy of accepting students not apart of the top 10 percent of their class and that the supreme court should rule in her favor. Abigail N. Fisher seems to have had the potential to be able to succeed at the University. Even though she was not considered apart of the top ten percent of her senior class she was in the twelve percent range and was still a highly competitive applicant. Not being accepted due to the University's goals of creativing diversity is not constitutional. Everyone should be given a fair chance to be admitted into the college especially if they are…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, the university admitted Sweat to the University’s Law School given that the Court had found a suitable solution to the racial discrimination practices (Hanushek et al., 2009).…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not only does this case deal with the concept of affirmative action and racial quotas, but also the equal protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that no business or state shall deny a person based on their race or sex. Allan Bakke, the defendant in this case, actually applied to the university two…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amy Rowley Case Summary

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Historical Setting In a 1966 amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the federal government began providing financial aid to states that provided education for children with disabilities. The program evolved into the Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA) of 1970. After a couple of lawsuits and an updated Act, the government determined that students with disabilities had the right to public education, and parents had the right to participate in the process (Wright, 2010). Amy Rowley, a first-grader with an auditory impairment, and her family filed suit against her school district in the Federal District Court after the New York Commissioner of Education affirmed the school district’s decision to refuse a sign-language interpreter.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Blakee later learned that minorities with lower qualifications than Blakee were granted admission to the School because of the quota at the California at Davis School of Medicine. Eventually Justice Powell of the Supreme court ruled that the quota at the California School of Medicine was unconstitutional. The fact that there were differences in the Fisher v. University of Texas and the California V. Blakee case left people into determining if Justice Powell’s decision was…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Abigail Fisher feels that she was treated unfairly because of her race in applying to the University of Texas. The university incorportates affirmative action as a factor in accepting students. She believed that it stripped away her right to the fourteenth amendment. Those who censorious of affirmative action say that it is not fair to all students and that race should not be a factor of choosing who is accepted, groups like, The Project on Fair Representation. The court on the other hand stated in the article that, affirmative action is not unconstitutional.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yet, the question still stands, considering race never means just minority races or majority races, and it’s the consideration of race which does not mean you won 't get in because of the race you are. I went through the Amicus briefs for this case, The United States, supported the university of Texas because there are educational benefits that come from student body diversity that justifies any university’s consideration of race during admissions. Teach for America, supported University of Texas because they felt desegregation of schools is one of the most important factors to date, and supported a mixed class of races. Even, Harvard University supported University of Texas because courts long affirmed that after a student body is judged if they meet the academic needs , that race is allowed to play a factor in selection, that amicus brief really stood out to me for the reason that harvard is a private university and doesn’t have to abide by the Equal Protection clause but still decided in favor of The University of Texas. I also looked at amicus briefs that supported fisher American Civil Rights Union, supported Fisher for the fact that the college was racially discriminative of whites and Jews and favours of minorities and that spoil systems for race were put in place.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On October 12, 1977, a thirty-five-year-old white male by the name of Allan Bakke took the University of California Davis Medical School to the California Supreme Court for rejecting his admission into the school “because of his race”; he believed his rights had been violated under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The University of California Davis Medical School reserved sixteen spots for minorities out of every 100 students. Allan Bakke, wanting to become a doctor, applied for medical school at the university two years in a row, and was rejected both times. Bakke discovered all of the minority students let into the school instead of him had lower test scores and grade point averages than he did, and so he was convinced that if the school didn’t have the minority program, he would be accepted into the university.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fisher Vs Texas

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fisher argues that although Grutter permits universities to seek a “critical mass” of minority students in the student body, it does not suggest that each classroom must have a similar critical mass. Instead, she claims that the proper base for measuring diversity is the student body as a whole. Fisher further argues that even if UT’s admission policy furthers a compelling state interest, the university has failed to show that the policy is necessary to create a diverse student body. She asserts that Texas’s Top Ten Percent Law has caused a dramatic increase in minority enrollment, so UT has established a “critical mass” of minority students without the use of racial classifications. Because the Top Ten Percent Law has proven to be a “workable race-neutral alternative,” Fisher claims that UT’s race-conscious admissions policy is not necessary to ensure…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As result of the Supreme Court case, Fisher v. University of Texas questions involving the application of affirmative action during college decisions produces a response by professor emeritus of law and sociology, Richard O. Lempert. As to put an end to the debate over whether affirmative action backfires on those admitted into selective institutions Lempert published an article named, “The Supreme Court Has Upheld Affirmative Action. So Let’s Dump Mismatch Theory.” Consequently, Lempert refers to research done by Mary J. Fischer, Douglas S. Massey, and other experts who through their research are able to express how affirmative action does not lead to the mismatching of individuals and institutions of higher education. Mismatching is the…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should affirmative action be allowed in schools? Or does the very idea undermine equality? The case of affirmative action has confronted the Supreme Court in 2008 by a white woman, Abigail Fisher, who believed she was denied acceptance to the University of Texas at Austin because of her skin color. The Court eventually refused to make a major ruling, but instead sent the case back to the lower courts for future analysis and for a future ruling. As for now, affirmative action still exists, but the standards have been raised to attempt to insure equality among acceptance into college, but there are some who still believe that the necessity to fight the discrimination of races makes affirmative action an inevitable action upon college acceptances.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Importance Of Title IX

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The three-part test associated with Title IX needs to be more developed and rationalized for the law to be properly met. Providing equal participation opportunities for male and female students that also represents the university population, expanding on a broken program, and attempting to show that they have properly accommodated the interest of the underrepresented members in a program is essentially unrealistic and holds more problems than need be. To…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays