Affirmative Action Rhetorical Analysis

Decent Essays
Abigail Fisher feels that she was treated unfairly because of her race in applying to the University of Texas. The university incorportates affirmative action as a factor in accepting students. She believed that it stripped away her right to the fourteenth amendment. Those who censorious of affirmative action say that it is not fair to all students and that race should not be a factor of choosing who is accepted, groups like, The Project on Fair Representation. The court on the other hand stated in the article that, affirmative action is not unconstitutional. They did however, say that they should accept students on their merits first and then their ethnicity second. I support the Supreme Court's decision because it gives all people the chance

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion I find that the Abigail N. Fisher has presented a good amount evidence proving that the University of Texas, Austin’s policy is unconstitutional based on their policy of accepting students not apart of the top 10 percent of their class and that the supreme court should rule in her favor. Abigail N. Fisher seems to have had the potential to be able to succeed at the University. Even though she was not considered apart of the top ten percent of her senior class she was in the twelve percent range and was still a highly competitive applicant. Not being accepted due to the University's goals of creativing diversity is not constitutional. Everyone should be given a fair chance to be admitted into the college especially if they are…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1997, the Texas legislature enacted a law requiring all public universities in Texas to admit all high school seniors who ranked in the top ten percent of their high school’s graduating class. The University of Texas at Austin, after finding disparities between the racial and ethnic makeup of the university's undergraduate population and the state's population, decided to modify its race-neutral admissions policy. The new policy continued to admit all in-state students who graduated in the top ten percent of their high school classes, however, for the remainder of the in-state freshman class the university would consider race as a factor for admissions into the university. The plaintiff, Abigail Fisher, a white female, applied for undergraduate admission to the University of Texas in 2008.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With this, the Supreme Court ruled that the use of racial quotas is unconstitutional, but the university is allowed to practice affirmative action (Tribe,…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the progression of the lawsuit continued the University shut down its quota system and appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision, that the state may consider race as a factor on a case-by-case basis. The Court continued by saying that the school violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause, and accused of discriminating against Caucasians because they were excluded from 16 out of 100 spots by the virtue of their…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All in all, “For the Equal Rights Amendment” was very well written. Chisholm’s her knowledge and wisdom indicated ethos, her evidence and logic indicated logos and her word choice and emotions indicated pathos. Her argument and her speech were both more strong and powerful because of ethos, logos, and…

    • 50 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, it is certain that affirmative action has benefited a group of people more than others. Initially, affirmative action was meant for federal contractors. Although, they were supposed to employee people without regards to their race, color, or national origin, studies have shown “that affirmative action helps white woman” (Nittle) more than women or men of color. In the Supreme Court case of Abigail Fisher versus the University of Texas, ironically, she is the type of person affirmative action benefits the most. But the ban of affirmative action has not always been a disadvantage for all minorities.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a heated age and the policy of affirmative action is a controversial topic. Ever since it was first introduced in the 1960s, the court has affected the use of affirmative action significantly because its rulings upheld the policy’s constitutionally and made it more acceptable to the public. To begin with, it is important to acknowledge that the court was not the only arena in which affirmative action policies have been challenged. It has also been challenged in arenas such as college admission and the job application process. In my opinion, the case of Brown v. Board of Education had a significant impact on the introducing the affirmative action.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Blakee later learned that minorities with lower qualifications than Blakee were granted admission to the School because of the quota at the California at Davis School of Medicine. Eventually Justice Powell of the Supreme court ruled that the quota at the California School of Medicine was unconstitutional. The fact that there were differences in the Fisher v. University of Texas and the California V. Blakee case left people into determining if Justice Powell’s decision was…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yet, the question still stands, considering race never means just minority races or majority races, and it’s the consideration of race which does not mean you won 't get in because of the race you are. I went through the Amicus briefs for this case, The United States, supported the university of Texas because there are educational benefits that come from student body diversity that justifies any university’s consideration of race during admissions. Teach for America, supported University of Texas because they felt desegregation of schools is one of the most important factors to date, and supported a mixed class of races. Even, Harvard University supported University of Texas because courts long affirmed that after a student body is judged if they meet the academic needs , that race is allowed to play a factor in selection, that amicus brief really stood out to me for the reason that harvard is a private university and doesn’t have to abide by the Equal Protection clause but still decided in favor of The University of Texas. I also looked at amicus briefs that supported fisher American Civil Rights Union, supported Fisher for the fact that the college was racially discriminative of whites and Jews and favours of minorities and that spoil systems for race were put in place.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    citizens. Although the Executive Order 9808 held equality, it did not prevent the states from promoting segregation and discrimination. For instance, in Sipuel v. Oklahoma State Board of Regents, Marshall, Sipuel’s civil rights attorney, argued that the denial of Sipuel’s admission because of her race and color was considered to be illegal. In addition, Marshall claimed that the words “separate” and “equal” were not equivalent, and could not be used together at the same time (Ladino, 13). Although the court ruled that the university’s rejection of Sipuel was unconstitutional in terms of the Fourteenth Amendment, the court claimed that desegregation was not the problem that interrupted Sipuel’s admission.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness” written by Michelle Alexander, she talks about the issue of mass incarceration throughout the United States. She points out the legal discrimination felons are subject to, hence a second class citizen. Alexander sees the problem of the majority of the prison population are African American males. She states that the War On Drugs helped spike this mass incarceration, and had the intent to discriminate against African American males. Hence the name of “The New Jim Crow”, she found this to be the modern day Jim Crow laws which the criminal justice system is responsible for.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are racial struggles in the U.S. There was slavery in the U.S. People were mean to the slaves. Then there was a civil war, north against the south, the north won the battle. The north made slavery illegal. The black people that were slaves were emancipated and set free.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, there are 4 major political actors that appear in the article with quite different interests. One of these actors includes the University of Texas at Austin in which the President of the university said, “We remain committed to assembling a student body at The University of Texas at Austin that provides the educational benefits of diversity on campus while respecting the rights of all students and acting within the constitutional framework established by the Court” (NBC news article). The political actor that stands on the…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Affirmative Action Case Study

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    As it is now, it facilitates the entrance to college to minorities of the higher classes. In its current form, affirmative action is well intentioned, but it is rather ineffective, and it sets itself up for causing a stir among whites who feel that minority status is taking precedent over academic performance, and calling this practice reverse discrimination. The case against the University of Michigan is a prime example of this. But William Symonds has a solution that would not only allow for more racial integration, but with race not playing a big role, if any roll at all in being a factor in deciding college admissions. Basing affirmative action off of financial need, with the money provided for the less fortunate to attend four-year universities would not only draw from the pool of minorities that make up a large portion of the lower classes, it would also give everyone a truly equal opportunity to attend college.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Affirmative action policies allow for equal opportunity and throughout history have helped end discrimination in the workforce as well as many different type of organizations. Minorities are given the opportunity to compete for job opportunities and admissions to educational institutions. However, not everyone agrees with these types of policies and believe that this is a form of “reverse discrimination” against white individuals (1). These individuals argue that minorities that include people of color and women are given preference and although the qualifications may be the same amongst all, the minorities will be granted the opportunity simply because of their skin color or gender. In “Affirmative Action and Fairness” Robert Fullinwider discusses how affirmative action is viewed differently…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays